I've owned the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM lens now for a bunch of years. I use it to take photos of my daughter while competitive horse back riding and my son while performing int theater. I also use it for general pics while on vacation in the mountains. Since buying it, I've always had this feeling that I should have bought the 70-200 instead. I'm in a position financially where I can afford to spend 2K on this lens now but I'm not sure if I should anymore. I'm heading to Utah in a month and it got me thinking about lenses once again. Do you guys think I'll use it much in spite of having the 100-400? I'm guessing I'm going to love the faster lens of the 70-200 while shooting my son doing theater and it may be a better lens for shooting my daughter riding horses and jumping.
Also, I'm shooting a 6D that I bought new in 2012. Would I be better off (instead of buying the new lens) buying a 5D Mark IV instead? I can't afford both but I can afford either one.
Any advice?

