Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Camera Reviews 
Thread started 12 Jun 2018 (Tuesday) 15:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND George Zip (showing now: George Zip)
Overall Ratingn/a
not rated
Overall Image Qualityn/a
not rated
Value for Moneyn/a
not rated
Must Haven/a
not rated
Suitability to Intended Usen/a
not rated
Got What I Expectedn/a
not rated
AF Performancen/a
not rated
Handling and Ergonomicsn/a
not rated
User-interfacen/a
not rated
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, reviewed by George Zip

 
George ­ Zip
My neighbours are looking at me a bit strangely
Avatar
1,386 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 1938
Joined Aug 2015
     
Jun 12, 2018 15:50 |  #1

I thought I would write a review after having now owned it since late 2016 when it came out. So this is sort of a long time review.

So do I like it? Yes I do. In fact I just recently purchased a second one.

This is all from a stills point of view. I pretty much never do any video.

So here is my journey to date. I started as someone who always wanted to learn photography. Got obsessed and picked up a 5d2 along the way. I eagerly waited for 5d4 to come out and did the upgrade which was a big one. I got asked to shoot a wedding and have been hooked ever since. I love the challenge of shooting weddings and I have been studying the art of photographing people, which is an amazingly complex subject when you get into it. Anyway.... This is what I think hitting the main points that I consider important.

Image Quality: This is why I like it. I love the files that come straight of the camera. They are really beautiful. I basically do not have to do much at all to get where I want to get in PP. I import them with a basic preset I made and do some tweaks and that's it. The colours are nice plus it has an intangible quality that I do not know how to put into words that I really really like. I could not care less that it may or may not be a stop better of worse in terms of dynamic range. I see videos of someone photographing something 5 stops underexposed and lift the shadows and whine about the results. I don't get that. I do understand that landscape and real estate photographers appreciate as much DR as is available, but for most of us I do not understand the obsession with this spec.

Having said all that the Dynamic Range is great. I can recover shadows if I make a meal out of an exposure or if I am too lazy to setup up some lighting.

As an aside I tried a Nikon D800E along the way as a possible second camera. The nikon was a fine camera took awesomely sharp photos, worked well but I did not like the images as much as the 5d4. They were too green and magenta on skin. I concede this is lack of skill of my part as many photographer I greatly admire use Nikon and their photos look amazing I gave up and moved on.

AF: I never miss with this. I generally shoot in single shot 90% of the time. It focus's great in low light and honestly it never misses unless I mess it up. I find it remarkable. Shooting at 1.4 is always in focus. Also for a hack Macro photographer like me it makes it really easy. Also there is a bottomless pit of way you can set up the focus options. There is a dude on Youtube that runs through all the options.

Build: This is what I like about Canon and Nikon. They are tough and just work. I have never had a serious problem with it. It always works, the buttons always feel great. I place a really high value on reliability. Nothing sucks more than a buggy or unreliable product. Having said all that I have twice been unable to view images on the back of the screen if I hit play. This was after a full day of shooting, changing lenses and shooting about 800 to 1000 photos. If I power cycle it it goes away. It has not happened since I firmware updated it. I suspect it is some odd bug from a series of actions through the day. If that is all I have to worry about that is ok.

Live View: Really nice screen, looks great. It is something I use occasionally if I am holding the camera over my head or if I want to eyeball exposure if I am not sure. The face detect feature is really good. I am pretty sure it focus's on the eye. I am surprised that this was not more heavily marketed like Sony have done with their awesome eye detect.

Frames Per Second. 7 is enough for what I do and I would imagine for the majority of other people. In fact I really never use it and even then I do not really need it. I actually find I get better shots if I do not use it and anticipate shots.

Flicker Control: This is solid gold when you need it. I seem to need it a lot. Works great.

WiFi: Works fine. I personally the software for the phone is clunky and cumbersome. But is great for when I put the camera on a monopod up high or to do ground level shooting or whatever. Also super useful to get images on your phone and up online. I do this a lot shooting events when trying to beat everyone else getting images up.

Low Light High ISO: Really good. Obviously the lower the ISO the better but I have zero problems going to 6400 and 12800 in a pinch. Plus the noise when present is not terrible. The main thing is that the light is nice light. I have shot at 32000 as the sun has gone down and the file looks amazing as the light is ambient and not mixed. . The issue as always is in mixed light it will make your high ISO files look terrible.

Flash: The one thing that never seems to get talked about is how well it implements flash. It really is outstanding.

Ergonomics: I think this is a preference and what you start out with. But I think it is excellent and very intuitive. I wish the body was a little bigger so my pinky finger has somewhere to sit better to avoid hand fatigue rather than have to use a grip.

Value: I think it is overpriced considering what the competition is doing. But you have to take into account the total cost of ownership. Lenses are cheaper than Nikon or Sony. Plus the entire eco system is outstanding. Especially when you get into strobe land.

The competition?? I look over the fence at cameras like the Nikon 850 or Sony's latest offerings and I must admit I have spec envy. It feels like Canon is getting eaten by the competition. However the way I shoot, the extra specs honestly would not benefit me. I think the pros of the entire Canon system outweighs a few tech benefits that say Sony offers. Personally I would not change as I love the lenses and as I said I love the images straight out of camera.

The future? Personally I hope the 5d5 is a mirrorless camera. The main main thing I want is to see exposure in the view finder but have the canon files. The other benefits would be neat like IBIS and the Silent Shutter.

Summary: I think it is a awesome jack of all trades camera that is tough and reliable and produces outstanding images. If you can't get good photos with the 5d4 then you need education , not a marginally better camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
ozziepuppy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,125 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Likes: 1137
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 29, 2018 12:19 |  #2

This is a very helpful review. Thank you for taking the time to post such comprehensive information. From what you have written, it sounds like our requirements are similar. I currently have a 5D Mark II (which I like very much), but I would like better autofocus and low light performance. I am currently trying to decide between the 5D Mark IV and the EOS R, but your review is pushing me toward the Mark IV.


Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Zip
THREAD ­ STARTER
My neighbours are looking at me a bit strangely
Avatar
1,386 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 1938
Joined Aug 2015
     
Oct 29, 2018 14:57 as a reply to  @ ozziepuppy's post |  #3

Thanks.

I also did one here with pictures

https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/thread/43223​61 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozziepuppy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,125 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Likes: 1137
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 29, 2018 16:02 |  #4

George Zip wrote in post #18739395 (external link)
Thanks.

I also did one here with pictures

https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/thread/43223​61 (external link)

I enjoyed that review also -- thank you for the link! You make excellent points and the photos are great! :-)


Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Zip
THREAD ­ STARTER
My neighbours are looking at me a bit strangely
Avatar
1,386 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 1938
Joined Aug 2015
     
Oct 29, 2018 16:53 |  #5

ozziepuppy wrote in post #18739435 (external link)
I enjoyed that review also -- thank you for the link! You make excellent points and the photos are great! :-)

Thank you sir




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 556
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
     
Nov 01, 2018 05:03 |  #6

Excellent review, thank you. I too have been dithering for quite a while to which camera to buy after selling my 5D3, I think you have helped make my mind up.


I like what I like.
Gear-Canon 1DX2, Canon Eos 7D2, Canon EF 300mm f2.8L IS II USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS II USM, EF100mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM, Canon EF 70-200 f/4 IS USM. Canon extenders 1.4x & 2x MKIII.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdvaden
Goldmember
Avatar
2,743 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 907
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Post edited 2 months ago by mdvaden.
     
Nov 05, 2018 00:23 |  #7

Red Dexs wrote in post #18741313 (external link)
Excellent review, thank you. I too have been dithering for quite a while to which camera to buy after selling my 5D3, I think you have helped make my mind up.

Consider too that Sony's A7R iii is not properly weather sealed like the 5D mk iv. There's a great demo on Youtube somewhere, along with Nikon and one other brand. The Canon was one of the better bodies.

I'd be getting one had I not got the EOS R recently with plans to get the EOS R pro model coming the next year. Canon's system is great, and IBIS is of minimal help to many shooters.

Look at Canon for refurbished prices too.


vadenphotography.com (external link) . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Dexs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,685 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 556
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Crete Greece.
     
Nov 05, 2018 04:26 |  #8

Since replying to this thread I have had another try with a D850 and this is some camera.


I like what I like.
Gear-Canon 1DX2, Canon Eos 7D2, Canon EF 300mm f2.8L IS II USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS II USM, EF100mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM, Canon EF 70-200 f/4 IS USM. Canon extenders 1.4x & 2x MKIII.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Zip
THREAD ­ STARTER
My neighbours are looking at me a bit strangely
Avatar
1,386 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 1938
Joined Aug 2015
     
Nov 05, 2018 22:56 |  #9

Red Dexs wrote in post #18744382 (external link)
Since replying to this thread I have had another try with a D850 and this is some camera.

The 850 is an amazing camera IMO




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris_71
Member
Avatar
37 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2018
     
Dec 09, 2018 21:02 |  #10

I had one for about 6 months and think it is one of the best Canon cameras ever built. Had I stayed with the Canon brand instead of going mirrorless, it would be my everyday camera.


Sony A7III | Sony A9 | Sony 28mm f/2 | Sony 50mm f/1.8 | Sony 85mm f/1.8 | Sony 70-200mm f/4 | Sony GM100-400
NC Sports News Staff Photographer (external link) | @rvingphotographer (external link)
See More, Shoot Less

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,297 views & 10 likes for this thread
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, reviewed by George Zip
FORUMS Gear Reviews Camera Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Chromatime
760 guests, 363 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.