Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 29 Jun 2018 (Friday) 07:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

FedEx, UPS, and Shipping Equipment to a Destination Shoot

 
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 29, 2018 07:31 |  #1

One of my best organizational clients back in Illinois before I moved to Texas wants to hire me for portrait shoot of their national officers in St Paul, MN.

They basically want the same kind of studio session I'd done for them many times before...which means a fair amount of equipment. I'm trying to determine if transporting my own equipment would be better than renting on site.

There are a number of pros and cons, but a blank spot on my spreadsheet are the factors of shipping equipment by FedEx or UPS. My gear is set up to be transported in the kind of containers linked below, which are often used to transport golf bags.

Anyone familiar with shipping equipment? I can determine basic costs and those objective factors, but what has been the experience as far as the intangibles. Tough to deal with? Too much red tape? Dicey deliveries? What are the war stories?


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tcphoto1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,747 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1971
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
     
Jun 29, 2018 08:02 |  #2

I had a large out of town project last week and chose to rent from Borrowlenses. I ended up renting for a week for the three day shoot and there were no issues. It was cheaper than renting locally, UPS delivered and then picked up after I packed everything. I checked both local and online vendors and Borrowlenses was cheaper even with shipping charges. I charge a Digital Capture Fee for every job whether I rent or use my own gear and that fee more than covered rentals. It was nice getting on the plane with my camera bag and checked one bag.


www.tonyclarkphoto.com (external link)
www.tcphoto.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 29, 2018 08:07 |  #3

tcphoto1 wrote in post #18653489 (external link)
I had a large out of town project last week and chose to rent from Borrowlenses. I ended up renting for a week for the three day shoot and there were no issues. It was cheaper than renting locally, UPS delivered and then picked up after I packed everything. I checked both local and online vendors and Borrowlenses was cheaper even with shipping charges. I charge a Digital Capture Fee for every job whether I rent or use my own gear and that fee more than covered rentals. It was nice getting on the plane with my camera bag and checked one bag.

Yeah, carrying equipment (beyond my camera case) with me on an airline fell off the chart right away.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MBR
Member
136 posts
Likes: 131
Joined Mar 2018
     
Jul 01, 2018 07:38 |  #4

RDKirk wrote in post #18653478 (external link)
One of my best organizational clients back in Illinois before I moved to Texas wants to hire me for portrait shoot of their national officers in St Paul, MN.

They basically want the same kind of studio session I'd done for them many times before...which means a fair amount of equipment. I'm trying to determine if transporting my own equipment would be better than renting on site.

There are a number of pros and cons, but a blank spot on my spreadsheet are the factors of shipping equipment by FedEx or UPS. My gear is set up to be transported in the kind of containers linked below, which are often used to transport golf bags.

Anyone familiar with shipping equipment? I can determine basic costs and those objective factors, but what has been the experience as far as the intangibles. Tough to deal with? Too much red tape? Dicey deliveries? What are the war stories?

If you have a safe place for the equipment to be received, I would recommend UPS insured, adult signature required.

I don't see a link for the containers, but I use Pelican cases and ship them in discrete cardboard boxes.

The trick is to have something on the receiving end you trust who will not cause a package to evaporate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archfotos
Member
119 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2016
     
Jul 01, 2018 08:02 |  #5

I've had UPS and Fedex ship a 1650 pelican case, not express cheapest possible, and it still seems more expensive than the airlines extra baggage charges. Am I sending it wrong??? One time with Fedex it was sent to their location at the airport (but away from the terminal) they were closed by the time we touched down (thank you expensive airline ticket) needed to return to the airport the next day just to pick up that case - pita. I would say the same with UPS never as seamless as I've hoped.

There was one shooter on one of the association boards who mathematically showed how anything less than 2,000 miles it was cheaper / easier to have an assistant drive them verses using airlines. Granted I believe the person uses a lot of lighting. Although with St Paul there is bound to be good rental houses for the video market so c-stands and any of the hardware should be rather easy - if you give yourself an extra day to round up equipment and a local assistant with a good vehicle to return it.

For me I have no problem driving and grabbing a hotel(not plural) within reason - airlines suck and books on tape make the drive ok.


DC Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jul 01, 2018 09:38 |  #6

FedEx for one has a service for "Hold for pickup" at certain locations. When I shipped items, there hasn't been any extra charge but I'm usually only shipping a single container, maybe 50#. You can check available receiving locations at http://www.fedex.com …ation_find_loca​tions.html (external link). Check hours for pickup as well. You may not want to arrive on Sunday and not be able to pick up your gear until Monday.

I also believe UPS has a similar service but the number of locations is very short as compared to FedEx here in Philadelphia.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
Post edited over 5 years ago by Tom Reichner. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 05, 2018 10:01 |  #7

RDKirk wrote in post #18653478 (external link)
One of my best organizational clients back in Illinois before I moved to Texas wants to hire me . . .

archfotos wrote in post #18654422 (external link)
For me I have no problem driving and grabbing a hotel(not plural) within reason - airlines suck and books on tape make the drive ok.

Yeah, Texas to Illinois sounds like a fairly quick, easy drive. . A day and a half. . Only one overnight. . Plenty of Cracker Barrels along the way for easy, fast meals. . No worries or concerns about shipping all that equipment. . And you'll have your own car when you arrive, instead of having to rent one or rely on somebody else for transportation.

I often wonder why people fly when driving is so easy, and not as time-consuming as people tend to think it is. . When you add up all the time getting a ride to the airport, showing up two hours before the flight, retrieving checked bags, getting a rental car, packaging all of the items for shipment, re-packaging them and shipping them back home, etc, etc, etc, ...... how much time are you really saving when you fly?
.

RDKirk wrote in post #18653478 (external link)
My gear is set up to be transported in the kind of containers linked below, which are often used to transport golf bags.

"Linked below" ..... hmmmmmm, I've looked and looked, but still don't see the link.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tcphoto1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,747 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1971
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
     
Jul 05, 2018 10:12 |  #8

I don't know if I'd want to drive a day and a half when I could fly. Yes, you would bill mileage, travel time and kit fee but I'd be worn-out from the drive. Secondly, would your gear be secured in your vehicle with nothing visible when your at a restaurant and hotel? I have a new client located in Dallas which is a 12 hour drive and I don't think that I'd want to do that drive 4-6 times a year.


www.tonyclarkphoto.com (external link)
www.tcphoto.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MBR
Member
136 posts
Likes: 131
Joined Mar 2018
     
Jul 05, 2018 10:27 |  #9

tcphoto1 wrote in post #18656768 (external link)
I don't know if I'd want to drive a day and a half when I could fly. Yes, you would bill mileage, travel time and kit fee but I'd be worn-out from the drive. Secondly, would your gear be secured in your vehicle with nothing visible when your at a restaurant and hotel? I have a new client located in Dallas which is a 12 hour drive and I don't think that I'd want to do that drive 4-6 times a year.

If a trip involves more than a few hours of driving I would prefer to fly, it's a pain, but a lot safer, last thing I need to do is get into a wreck and be stuck in Podunk searching for a rental, and paying out the nose for a tow job to get my vehicle back home.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jul 05, 2018 20:18 |  #10

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18656763 (external link)
Yeah, Texas to Illinois sounds like a fairly quick, easy drive. . A day and a half. . Only one overnight. . Plenty of Cracker Barrels along the way for easy, fast meals. . No worries or concerns about shipping all that equipment. . And you'll have your own car when you arrive, instead of having to rent one or rely on somebody else for transportation.

Oh, I drive that distance quite frequently. The actual gig is not in Illinois, but in St Paul.

"Linked below" ..... hmmmmmm, I've looked and looked, but still don't see the link.

.

https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …DIUM_STAND_TRAN​SPORT.html (external link)


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jul 05, 2018 20:20 |  #11

tcphoto1 wrote in post #18656768 (external link)
I don't know if I'd want to drive a day and a half when I could fly. Yes, you would bill mileage, travel time and kit fee but I'd be worn-out from the drive. Secondly, would your gear be secured in your vehicle with nothing visible when your at a restaurant and hotel? I have a new client located in Dallas which is a 12 hour drive and I don't think that I'd want to do that drive 4-6 times a year.

In my case, what they want is what I've done for them in the studio. That's going to take a couple of big light cases which are no problem to carry in my minivan, but cause me a lot of trepidation to attempt to fly with.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
benji25
Goldmember
Avatar
1,189 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 281
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Post edited over 5 years ago by benji25.
     
Jul 06, 2018 15:23 |  #12

I live in the twin cities so if there is anything I can do to help let me know.

How much equipment are we talking?

I have 4 light stands (2 c stands and 2 Manfrotto portable light stands) that you could borrow.


Website (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
     
Jul 07, 2018 23:30 |  #13

Shipping either UPS or FedEx is very simple and reliable. Neither is perfect, but both are very good. Even with cases small enough to travel in the hold I'd choose advanced shipping every time, especially with a business address. My only war stories are with checked bags and good old Utied Airlines.

If you have a big load of stuff and don't mind paying rather seriously, you might check out TTI. They do great work and will even do disassembly and set up for you. http://www.ttitranspor​tservices.com/ (external link)


George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,374 views & 5 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
FedEx, UPS, and Shipping Equipment to a Destination Shoot
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1451 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.