Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 20 Jul 2018 (Friday) 10:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Basic Softbox questions

 
southwestform
Member
86 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2014
     
Jul 20, 2018 10:27 |  #1

I am using a Chimera 24x36 softbox that was originally purchased for video lights. I am shooting portraits with strobes and want soft lighting.

1. Does the fact that it was originally marketed for video lights make a difference with the quality of light it produces?
2. Would I see much difference with moving up to a 36x48 Chimera softbox?

Thanks in advance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jul 20, 2018 10:34 |  #2

No, yes.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,447 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4539
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 20, 2018 21:52 |  #3

southwestform wrote in post #18666693 (external link)
I am using a Chimera 24x36 softbox that was originally purchased for video lights. I am shooting portraits with strobes and want soft lighting.

1. Does the fact that it was originally marketed for video lights make a difference with the quality of light it produces?
2. Would I see much difference with moving up to a 36x48 Chimera softbox?

Thanks in advance.

1. NO, only size matters
2. It depends upon the distance from softbox to subject, but no matter what you only will get a 50% differential
(larger box equally soft when at 1.5x the distance to subject)
(larger box has 'somewhat softer' shadow edges (penumbra)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-Duck-
my head is usually in the way
Avatar
1,731 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 817
Joined Apr 2016
Location: Shelton, CT USA
     
Jul 20, 2018 22:26 |  #4

From B&H; "The Chimera Small Video Pro Plus softbox is designed for use with a hotlight but may also be used with flash."

To answer the second question requires a better understanding of what you are trying to photograph. If you're doing headshots or tabletop stuff then what you have will serve you well and makes for a nice portable softbox. If you're indenting to do full body work, well, then you'll run into some limitations. But then, you'll notice the same limitations with a 36x48 too.

One thing that I see a majority of photographers do is use the rectangular softbox orientated in portrait mode (up and down) never horizontal. I often run mine horizontal as it gives me more feathering. Just a little side note. :)


"If you didn't learn something new today, you wasted a day."
Unitas Photography (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
southwestform
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
86 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2014
     
Jul 23, 2018 13:13 as a reply to  @ -Duck-'s post |  #5

What minimum size would you recommend for full body work?

Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jul 23, 2018 13:49 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

~72" tall, in octa, rectangular, or strip shape.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 5 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Jul 23, 2018 13:56 |  #7

Alveric wrote in post #18668823 (external link)
~72" tall, in octa, rectangular, or strip shape.

whoa, go big or go home, eh? :D

OP. there is no "minimum size", neither is their a maximum size, other than physical constraints of using it and filling it with light. Plow through this thread and you will see many different set ups and many excellent results: https://photography-on-the.net …hread.php?t=984​150&page=1


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jul 23, 2018 14:02 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

You bet, Brisket! ;-)a

Well, the OP didn't quite specify what kind of portraits he wants. I don't own a sofbox that large—my largest is 48" tall, and I can still do full-body portraits if I don't mind the lower part of the body being a mite darker—it might even help, as it'd make the eye focus on the face, which is the important part of a portrait. If, on the other hand, the OP is creating images for, say a suit or tuxedo catalogue, then it'd be a different image where the whole body needs to have the same exposure value.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 5 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Jul 23, 2018 14:07 |  #9

Alveric wrote in post #18668843 (external link)
You bet, Brisket! ;-)a

Well, the OP didn't quite specify what kind of portraits he wants. I don't own a sofbox that large—my largest is 48" tall, and I can still do full-body portraits if I don't mind the lower part of the body being a mite darker—it might even help, as it'd make the eye focus on the face, which is the important part of a portrait. If, on the other hand, the OP is creating images for, say a suit or tuxedo catalogue, then it'd be a different image where the whole body needs to have the same exposure value.

I'm right there with you, 43" octa is my largest proper soft box, and I usually like that the face and upper body is a touch brighter.

I do have some shoot through fabric on the rare occasion I want to go larger.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-Duck-
my head is usually in the way
Avatar
1,731 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 817
Joined Apr 2016
Location: Shelton, CT USA
Post edited over 5 years ago by -Duck-.
     
Jul 23, 2018 14:12 as a reply to  @ southwestform's post |  #10

I have two 62" strip boxes that have served me well, but I also have two five foot reflective umbrellas that I tend to use when I want something with a bit more contrast. If I still need a larger light than that I also have six foot scrims I can use to make a six foot softbox with. And if that's not enough, I also have four 4x8 foot flats I can bounce off.

How's that for covering all the bases? :)

P.S. I had a buddy sharing my studio last year and he used 4 300ws strobes bounced off the inside of the 4x8 flats with an 8x8 scrim in front of it, essentially creating an 8x8 softbox. I had to wear suntan lotion any time he shot in the studio. :lol:


"If you didn't learn something new today, you wasted a day."
Unitas Photography (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RicoTudor
Senior Member
Avatar
677 posts
Likes: 386
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jul 23, 2018 17:48 |  #11

My only SB is a Chimera Medium (3'x4') that I find big enough for that kind of lighting. For larger sources I just bounce off something like a V-flat, Photoflex self-standing 6'x3' Litepanel, or the studio wall. Smaller sources will illuminate full-length if you pull it back and accept a slightly harder light and more ambient fill.


Canon, Nikon, Contax, Leica, Sony, Profoto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by bobbyz.
     
Jul 24, 2018 00:48 |  #12

Not a SB but I will happy with just this one.

https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …ara_222_ft_refl​ector.html (external link)


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jul 24, 2018 09:33 |  #13

bobbyz wrote in post #18669311 (external link)
Not a SB but I will happy with just this one.

https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …ara_222_ft_refl​ector.html (external link)

Too bad Andre The Giant is no longer with us, you'd be set.

RIP.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThreeHounds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,364 posts
Gallery: 129 photos
Likes: 3710
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
     
Jul 24, 2018 10:36 |  #14

bobbyz wrote in post #18669311 (external link)
Not a SB but I will happy with just this one.

https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …ara_222_ft_refl​ector.html (external link)

Why stop at 87"?

https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …a.html/?c3ch=CS​E&c3nid=98 (external link)


5D MkIII | 7D | Bronica ETRS
EF 24-105 f/4 L | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 70-300 f/4 L | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | Zenzanon 105 f/3.5 | Tamron SP90 f/2.8 Di Macro VC USM
flickr (external link)
Blanton James Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nixland
Senior Member
537 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 199
Joined Apr 2009
     
Jul 24, 2018 11:48 |  #15


Why stop at 10 feet?

http://www.plumeltd.co​m/jumbrella.htm (external link)

:-D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,982 views & 11 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Basic Softbox questions
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
559 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.