Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 12 Aug 2018 (Sunday) 17:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND Jeff USN Photog 72-76 (showing now: Jeff USN Photog 72-76)
Overall Ratingn/a
not rated
Overall Image Qualityn/a
not rated
Value for Moneyn/a
not rated
Bokehn/a
not rated
Sharpnessn/a
not rated
Contrastn/a
not rated
Focusingn/a
not rated
Must Haven/a
not rated
Suitability to Intended Usen/a
not rated
Got What I Expectedn/a
not rated
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Tamron 18-400mm F3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD

Tamron 18-400mm F3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD, reviewed by Jeff USN Photog 72-76

 
Jeff ­ USN ­ Photog ­ 72-76
Member
Avatar
218 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 207
Joined Aug 2014
Location: SE Massachusetts
     
Aug 12, 2018 17:33 |  #1

I decided to buy myself a retirement gift, a lens I normally wouldn’t buy. I had thought of the Canon 28-300 but two things held me back, one is the cost (facing Social Security in 2 months) and the bigger thing is the weight.
I don’t have any telephoto primes but I do have a 10-22, 18-135 STM, 55-250 STM, and a 35mm F/2 and my only white lens a Canon 100-400 with 2x teleconverter. I am happy with all the zoom lens and the 100-400 is really sharp, AND heavy – some years back I carried it for 10 hours at Disney World around my neck (it still hurts ROFL).
In looking at all the lenses out there I decided I would look for a super-telephoto zoom lens, something that I could carry when going places with my wife and not have to carry a camera back and a bevy of lenses, and then having to change them out in the field.

In looking at reviews I decided to try the Tamron 18-400. It is heavier than the STM’s but about half the weight of the 100-400. How would it perform? I made the assumption that it wouldn’t be as sharp as the 100-400 by a long shot but for carrying around my neck potentially for an all day walkabout and being able to cover almost any situation I thought I might run into it seemed like it would fit the bill.

The build quality seems to be very good. The zooming mechanism is fairly tight but I like that since it will probably loosen up over time. The manual focus has a relatively short throw making getting manual focus a bit tough, also the Canon 80D’s viewfinder is not really designed for manual focusing. The autofocus is adequate not super fast but not bad either. The focus is accurate, not complaints on my part. The only image I took with manual focus was of a jet flying overhead at 400mm handheld. In my shooting I didn’t really notice any real optical defects such as vignetting, however on the jet shot there appears to a little in the corners when shooting straight up. It is a slow lens and really needs a nice day to get the best results. Today was totally overcast, the clouds only breaking long enough to shoot the jet.

The zoom range is phenomenal and the sharpness is acceptable. All these shots except for the two shots of my 4x5 B&J were handheld and at f/8, ISO 2000 or 640. The macro will focus down to about 18 inches from the film-plane.

This is not a lens if you are looking for large blowups, it will be a bit soft but for personal photography and sharing better shots with people it is very good and it is "one lens to do it all"

All shots are straight from the camera, large fine, no processing at all.

18mm the white angel is barely seen in the center back of the gravestones, shows the reach of this lens

IMAGE: http://i63.tinypic.com/j8iotz.jpg

400mm

IMAGE: http://i65.tinypic.com/o9nxuc.jpg

400mm grackle 15 feet from camera

IMAGE: http://i67.tinypic.com/2mrb0bm.jpg

77mm my late son's gravesite about 6 feet from camera

IMAGE: http://i68.tinypic.com/14trg39.jpg

400mm tripod assisted 5 feet from camera

IMAGE: http://i63.tinypic.com/2zrmg3p.jpg

339mm bee 4 feet from camera

IMAGE: http://i66.tinypic.com/20pogva.jpg

IMAGE: http://i65.tinypic.com/206oadt.jpg

Current stable Canon 6D Mark II, 80D both with vertical grips, 10-20 EF-IS 35 f2 EF IS
18-135 EF IS 55-250 EF IS STM 100 EF "L" Macro IS 100-400 EF "L" IS ii, 70-200 EF L f/2.8 and more
my FLICKR page is reached at
http://www.jeffpadellp​hotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2725
Joined Oct 2015
     
Aug 12, 2018 18:15 |  #2

Nice photos from a 'do-it-all' lens.

Just curious, did you serve on the Enterprise (I think?)? Were you involved in any Apollo program recovery missions? My cousin was a US Navy Photographer in the late '60s/early '70s.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff ­ USN ­ Photog ­ 72-76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
218 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 207
Joined Aug 2014
Location: SE Massachusetts
     
Aug 12, 2018 18:33 as a reply to  @ Bassat's post |  #3

I was on the USS Independence CV-62. Nope we were not involved with any NASA operations. Navy Photographer, best job in the Navy!!!

Went to photo school in Pensacola, then stationed at the main lab there, NASP, then the USS Independence.


Current stable Canon 6D Mark II, 80D both with vertical grips, 10-20 EF-IS 35 f2 EF IS
18-135 EF IS 55-250 EF IS STM 100 EF "L" Macro IS 100-400 EF "L" IS ii, 70-200 EF L f/2.8 and more
my FLICKR page is reached at
http://www.jeffpadellp​hotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

504 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tamron 18-400mm F3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD, reviewed by Jeff USN Photog 72-76
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AvroPiklu
952 guests, 349 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.