Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
Thread started 14 Aug 2018 (Tuesday) 11:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4lb, 26 inch tripod too heavy for airpline/hiking?

 
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Aug 14, 2018 11:15 |  #1

Do you guys think this is too much to carry? I think I can fit it diagonally into my luggage if I take the ball head off. Weight's not too much an issue for me, plus I like the stability weight provides... not sure if I want to buy a dedicated travel tripod.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 14, 2018 14:32 |  #2

4 lb. without the head would be a heavy tripod with head...totalling about 7 lb., that is about what an aluminum Manfrotto 055 would weigh.

4 lb. with the head would be a light tripod, ..about what my Gitzo 25xx carbon fiber with RRS BH-40 head weigh

Back about 25 years ago Bogen still dominated the US market for 'good but affordable', hikers would select the 3001 and those working mainly 'in studio' or not hiking day after day would select the 3201 for its height and better rigidity.
The advent of Chinese carbon fiber tripods changed things a lot, after carbon fiber became less prohibitive in price (compared to Gitzo)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
Post edited over 5 years ago by Nathan.
     
Aug 16, 2018 11:42 |  #3

I figured. Thanks.

I have carbon fiber Amvona tripod which has worked okay. It's about 4 or 5 lbs and I've taken it on hikes. It's fallen apart on me several times and I've replaced nuts and bolts from Home Depot. I wanted an upgrade and I found an old Gitzo Explorer (G2227) for $200. I'll be using a Manfrotto 486RC2 Ball Head, so at least that's light.

Right after I bought the tripod, we started planning a trip to Yosemite. Now I'm wondering if I would have been better off buy a travel tripod. We don't travel often.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 16, 2018 11:54 |  #4

I just read a user report on the 2227. He states,

"On the 2227 leg spread is infinitely adjustable, without any catch mechanism, from fully vertical to flat on the ground. However, when you want to spread the legs to a normal standing position (which in my case is all I need most of the time), you find yourself having to pay close attention to a task which, so far, could be done almost unconsciously. There are small triangular marking on the top of the legs to indicate where to stop the spread for a vertical position. However, I found that it took me longer than normal to complete this step. I also found that I often spread each leg unevenly. "

Personally, I found that the Gitzos from around the 1990s had leg locks that I hated to use, so I ended up with a Bogen 3221 (about 7 lbs with head), until decades later when Gitzo introduced its G-Lock and the ALR (anti leg rotation) and bought my 2530 only then (4 lbs with head). Lugging 7 lbs. in the field was always mildly laborious for half day excursions, and lightening the load with 25 years more of wear and tear on the body was a treat.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Aug 16, 2018 12:31 |  #5

That's from Luminous Landscape, I think. I saw that. I also came across this in reviews:

"I was very interested in the Gitzo Explorer line because of the flexibility of the leg angles. Most other tripods on the market have legs that have "stops" that set the legs at hard angles (30, 45, 60 degrees). The Gitzo Explorer has legs that are able to be set at any angle by opening and closing the three spoon shaped levers. This allows you much flexibility in selecting the height of your tripod as well as helping to set the tripod around obstacles - great for landscape or macro photography."

I wanted something of better quality than what I have now. Gitzo arrives in about a week. I will see if it fits in my suit case. :-P I have some buyer's remorse, because I think I maybe should have bought something lighter. However, I'm reminded of windy situations after a long hike where I needed good stability... so I'm biased toward a heavier tripod. 4 lbs, plus ball head... I think I can handle that.

I suppose I could have spent more on a stable travel tripod, but I also wanted height. If I could only choose two between height, stability, and compactness... I chose height and stability.

What didn't you like about the leg locks? These are just twist locks, right?


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt.
     
Aug 16, 2018 16:51 |  #6

Nathan wrote in post #18685362 (external link)
What didn't you like about the leg locks? These are just twist locks, right?

Before ALR, the leg sections would twist, making it more difficult to lock/unlock leg sections, particularly with the twist locks that existed before G-locks

(Lack of) speed to set up or take down (when compared to the Manfrotto (Bogen) flip locks added to the downside of the older Gitzos.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,899 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
4lb, 26 inch tripod too heavy for airpline/hiking?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Urban Life & Travel 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1458 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.