Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 20 Aug 2018 (Monday) 13:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Resizing / Printing Images Question

 
canongear
Senior Member
327 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Apr 2011
     
Aug 20, 2018 13:14 |  #1

Hello
I have a number of bird images that someone would like printed off and framed as a gift suggestion from them.
They liked the images based on what they have seen in emails.
Before sending the images in emails, I cropped probably every image and changed the file dimension sizes to a smaller size for easier viewing.
The email images are all quite sharp.
All image editing and size changes for the email images was done in Lightroom.

So, I started to resize one of the images in Photoshop CC to a 4x6 inch size with a resolution of 300 px/in and right away I noticed that the eye of the bird is no longer as sharp as it was prior to changing the image size.
I see that the resolution was at 72 px/in in the smaller version of the same image.

300px/in is the suggested resolution for printing but, that doesn't work with this particular image and I suspect I'm going to have this same issue with the other images as well.

Is there some way to keep the sharpness of the smaller images when resizing the images to 4x6 format?

I have all the original raw files of the ones I want to print off but is there some way I can do what I want to do without having to reedit each image I want to print off?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Aug 20, 2018 13:52 |  #2
bannedPermanently

canongear wrote in post #18688469 (external link)
Hello
I have a number of bird images that someone would like printed off and framed as a gift suggestion from them.
They liked the images based on what they have seen in emails.
Before sending the images in emails, I cropped probably every image and changed the file dimension sizes to a smaller size for easier viewing.
The email images are all quite sharp.
All image editing and size changes for the email images was done in Lightroom.

So, I started to resize one of the images in Photoshop CC to a 4x6 inch size with a resolution of 300 px/in and right away I noticed that the eye of the bird is no longer as sharp as it was prior to changing the image size.
I see that the resolution was at 72 px/in in the smaller version of the same image.

300px/in is the suggested resolution for printing but, that doesn't work with this particular image and I suspect I'm going to have this same issue with the other images as well.

Is there some way to keep the sharpness of the smaller images when resizing the images to 4x6 format?

I have all the original raw files of the ones I want to print off but is there some way I can do what I want to do without having to reedit each image I want to print off?

Export them from Lightroom at the size you want.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canongear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
327 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Apr 2011
     
Aug 20, 2018 14:43 |  #3

john crossley wrote in post #18688519 (external link)
Export them from Lightroom at the size you want.

Thanks for that.
I usually don't go back to an image in Lightroom once I'm done with it and thought I would have to reedit each one thinking that the prior edits wouldn't still be showing.
Thankfully they are.

I'm going to have these images printed off at my local camera shop so, do I need to change the resolution from 72 to 300 or is that 300px/in suggestion just for printing an image directly from Lightroom?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Aug 20, 2018 16:17 |  #4

canongear wrote in post #18688585 (external link)
Thanks for that.
I usually don't go back to an image in Lightroom once I'm done with it and thought I would have to reedit each one thinking that the prior edits wouldn't still be showing.
Thankfully they are.

I'm going to have these images printed off at my local camera shop so, do I need to change the resolution from 72 to 300 or is that 300px/in suggestion just for printing an image directly from Lightroom?

call the camera shop and ask them.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4545
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt.
     
Aug 20, 2018 18:04 |  #5

canongear wrote in post #18688469 (external link)
Is there some way to keep the sharpness of the smaller images when resizing the images to 4x6 format?

I gotta throw your question back at you!
Ask yourself "What do I mean by 'sharpness of the smaller images"? if the original image was 3000 x 2000 pixels

  • the sharpness of a 15" x 10" image made from 3000 x 2000 pixels is 20 pixels per inch
  • the sharpness of a 5" x 3" image made from 3000 x 2000 pixels is 60 pixels per inch


...so just what do you mean to ask???


canongear wrote in post #18688469 (external link)
I have all the original raw files of the ones I want to print off but is there some way I can do what I want to do without having to reedit each image I want to print off?

If you have the RAW files, there is no 're-editing' in order to create a JPG file which is 1500 x 1000 pixels vs. one which is 3000 x 2000 pixels.
If you mean the pixel editor changes that you did to the JPG file (assuming you started with 3000 x 3000) in order to make the 1500 x 1000 pixel version, you simply edit the JPG file with a command like 'Resize' and tell it 50% (1500 x 1000 is 50% of 3000 x 2000)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Aug 20, 2018 18:08 |  #6

canongear wrote in post #18688725 (external link)
Wow, that was so helpful.

Your attempt at biting wit aside, calling the printer is the correct answer.

I have outsourced traditional offset, flexography, digital toner based, inkjet, dye sub, screen printing, and more for single sheets, short run books, catalogs, stationary, point of purchase, banners, trade show booths and so on.

Call the printer.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4545
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 20, 2018 18:14 |  #7

canongear wrote in post #18688585 (external link)
I'm going to have these images printed off at my local camera shop so, do I need to change the resolution from 72 to 300 or is that 300px/in suggestion just for printing an image directly from Lightroom?


75 dpi (DOTS of ink per inch) vs. 300 dpi is meaningless to any photo printer...the 'dpi' only means something to an offset printing press operator as it defines the coarseness of a 'dot grid' which is used to print a phot for a magazine or brochure with an offset printing press. (Your newspaper photo is perhaps 75 dots of ink per inch, while National Geographic photo is perhaps 300 dpi).

The '75' or '300' which is embedded in the JPG file's DPI data record is ignored by any inkjet based printer...that photo is printed at 5760 x 1440 dpi if you had specified highest print quality at time of output, which is the spec of the Epson XP-850 home photo printer, for example.
And 5760 x 1440 dpi applies to both a 6" x 4" print and to a 19" x 13" print from the same printer.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeffreybehr
Senior Member
Avatar
738 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 749
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Phoenix, Arizona USA
     
Aug 20, 2018 18:20 |  #8

canongear wrote in post #18688469 (external link)
Hello
I have a number of bird images that someone would like printed off and framed as a gift suggestion from them. They liked the images based on what they have seen in emails. Before sending the images in emails, I cropped probably every image and changed the file dimension sizes to a smaller size for easier viewing. The email images are all quite sharp. All image editing and size changes for the email images was done in Lightroom.

So, I started to resize one of the images in Photoshop CC to a 4x6 inch size with a resolution of 300 px/in and right away I noticed that the eye of the bird is no longer as sharp as it was prior to changing the image size. I see that the resolution was at 72 px/in in the smaller version of the same image. 300px/in is the suggested resolution for printing but, that doesn't work with this particular image and I suspect I'm going to have this same issue with the other images as well.

Is there some way to keep the sharpness of the smaller images when resizing the images to 4x6 format? I have all the original raw files of the ones I want to print, but is there some way I can do what I want to do without having to reedit each image I want to print off?

In one word, no. You need to restart this process with the raw image; you cannot recover the pixels you threw away when you resized the e-mailing. Develop the full-size image as you wish and save as a TIF with a new name. Only then should you resize the image for printing. And yes, you need to do this with every impage you wish to print. Remember, you threw away LOTS of pixels by resizing, and you can't get them back.


Fuji X-H2 w/SmallRig all-around L-plate.. Fugi lenses in 10-24/4, 16-55/2.8, 70-200, and 33/1.4, Canon TS-Es in 24/3.5 and 50/2.8, and Viltrox 75/1.2.. Gitzo GT-3533S Systematic tripod with leveler and Rogeti geared head.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4545
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt.
     
Aug 20, 2018 18:32 as a reply to  @ jeffreybehr's post |  #9

Just to clear up confusion and apparent conflict between what I wrote and what Jeff just wrote...
Assuming your RAW file was 4500 x 3000 pixels to start with...

  • if you started by outputting a 3000 x 2000 pixel JPG, it is reasonable to then resize that first JPG to make a 1500 x 1000 pixel JPG
  • if you started by outputting a 1500 x 1000 pixel JPG, it totally UNreasonable to then resize that first JPG to make a 3000 x 2000 pixel JPG

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Aug 20, 2018 22:22 |  #10

When I export from LightRoom, I'll always export a full size jpeg and then a resized one if required. There's usually going to be situations where someone will request that print at a larger size....and not to get into resolving detail at certain viewing distances....I am pretty certain my images will be sharp if coming from original size and being printed at any common paper size (with today's cameras, you get more into seeing if dot pitch is acceptable if going above 20" prints from full size image).


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 5 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 20, 2018 22:29 |  #11

canongear wrote in post #18688585 (external link)
Thanks for that.
I usually don't go back to an image in Lightroom once I'm done with it and thought I would have to reedit each one thinking that the prior edits wouldn't still be showing.
Thankfully they are.

I'm going to have these images printed off at my local camera shop so, do I need to change the resolution from 72 to 300 or is that 300px/in suggestion just for printing an image directly from Lightroom?

If you are going to print 4x6, then 4x300 x 6x300 = 1200x1800...

So take your full size image, use the cropping tool set to 1200pixel x 1800pixel, and crop the image to what you want to print. The result will be a 4x6 at 300dpi, which should be sufficient for any printer, especially for a 4x6. Ignore DPI, and instead worry about what the final resolution of the resulting image to be printed is. A good guideline is Hx300 x Wx300, where H and W are the print dimensions.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by digital paradise. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 21, 2018 08:44 |  #12

canongear wrote in post #18688585 (external link)
Thanks for that.
I usually don't go back to an image in Lightroom once I'm done with it and thought I would have to reedit each one thinking that the prior edits wouldn't still be showing.
Thankfully they are.

I'm going to have these images printed off at my local camera shop so, do I need to change the resolution from 72 to 300 or is that 300px/in suggestion just for printing an image directly from Lightroom?

The thing about LR is it does a good job at resizing and sharpening for media type.For printing you need to over-sharpen compared to screen viewing. So that comes with some trial and error if you do it by eye using USM or whatever other method you use. If you do a search there are plenty of videos on that.

If you want to use PS PK Sharpener became free a few months ago. It was $100. This is the same group created the export resizing and sharpening for LR.

http://www.pixelgenius​.com (external link)

Ignore DPI. That is for offset printing presses. PPI is what you are working with and suggested sizes were posted. Sometimes DPI is listed but they mean PPI. Canon's DPP is one. Don't know why but after all these years they still call it DPI.

You don't need to switch back and forth from 72 to 300 PPI or whatever you settle at. Once you find your printing sweet spot leave it there. PPI has nothing to do with screen resolution.

One image is at 0 PPI and the other is 1000. Can you see any difference.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/3/LQ_928921.jpg
Image hosted by forum (928921) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/3/LQ_928922.jpg
Image hosted by forum (928922) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 08:49 |  #13

I edited a sentence near the end of the last post. Once you find your printing sweet spot leave it there.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:04 |  #14
bannedPermanently

digital paradise wrote in post #18689206 (external link)
One image is at 0 PPI and the other is 1000. Can you see any difference.

Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in
./showthread.php?p=186​89206&i=i24389809
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in
./showthread.php?p=186​89206&i=i178748303
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

According to Photoshop they are BOTH at 300PPI.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
birderman
Goldmember
1,052 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Mar 2011
Location: London, UK
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:09 |  #15

You don't mention what the size was for the Emails, assuming these were around 72-100ppi (for HD screen 1920 by 1080 pixels) to give good display on most monitors then I would wouldn't expect a need to resize them to make 4x6 prints. But if you want to print out 10x8 or similar then you would be needing to add non existent pixels to print at 300ppi (3000 x 2400 pixels) hence the softening of the image.

The best method is during export from LR of the original file define how many pixels you want and ignore the PPI setting it is not used in most export operations. Work out how many pixels you require by multiplying the print size by required resolution. Note this is NOT same as cropping an image and the whole picture will be resized by lightroom to fight the pxiel dimensions your define. If you require different sizes of print then export for largest size print there is no need for different Jpegs for each size of print as the printers will manage the reduction in size.


HTH


Birderman
London, UK
my photos on Flickr (external link)
My Website (external link) or my Facebook - KishWphotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,298 views & 12 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Resizing / Printing Images Question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1626 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.