Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 20 Aug 2018 (Monday) 13:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Resizing / Printing Images Question

 
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Post edited over 5 years ago by davesrose.
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:13 |  #16

digital paradise wrote in post #18689206 (external link)
Don't know why but after all these years they still call it DPI.

I think it’s because within the universal term, PPI and DPI are units within Dot Pitch sizes. Pixels on monitors and dots with ink jet printers have had sub dots to construct color.

As for screen PPI, to reenforce other comments, it is a result of resolution and screen size.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:29 |  #17

john crossley wrote in post #18689225 (external link)
According to Photoshop they are BOTH at 300PPI.

Hmmm. I've used those before as for an example. I have a second set. If this doesn't work I'll do a set as we speak.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/3/LQ_928935.jpg
Image hosted by forum (928935) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/3/LQ_928936.jpg
Image hosted by forum (928936) © digital paradise [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:33 |  #18

birderman wrote in post #18689226 (external link)
You don't mention what the size was for the Emails, assuming these were around 72-100ppi (for HD screen 1920 by 1080 pixels) to give good display on most monitors then I would wouldn't expect a need to resize them to make 4x6 prints. But if you want to print out 10x8 or similar then you would be needing to add non existent pixels to print at 300ppi (3000 x 2400 pixels) hence the softening of the image.

The best method is during export from LR of the original file define how many pixels you want and ignore the PPI setting it is not used in most export operations. Work out how many pixels you require by multiplying the print size by required resolution. Note this is NOT same as cropping an image and the whole picture will be resized by lightroom to fight the pxiel dimensions your define. If you require different sizes of print then export for largest size print there is no need for different Jpegs for each size of print as the printers will manage the reduction in size.


HTH

PPI doesn't matter for emails. It can be anything you like.

Start at minute 8.

https://www.youtube.co​m …4mV3NsLmXw&feat​ure=relmfu (external link)


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:40 |  #19

digital paradise wrote in post #18689242 (external link)
Hmmm. I've used those before as for an example. I have a second set. If this doesn't work I'll do a set as we speak.

If exporting from Photoshop, it defaults to resetting PPI setting.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:48 |  #20

davesrose wrote in post #18689251 (external link)
If exporting from Photoshop, it defaults to resetting PPI setting.

It does? It changes the PPI when you use a save command? Not sure about that. If I use the Image Size command in PS and change the PPI I'm pretty sure it stays that way.

I'm pretty sure I used LR when I exported the original set of ducks.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:48 |  #21
bannedPermanently

digital paradise wrote in post #18689242 (external link)
Hmmm. I've used those before as for an example. I have a second set. If this doesn't work I'll do a set as we speak.


Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in
./showthread.php?p=186​89242&i=i233221664
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

Hosted photo: posted by digital paradise in
./showthread.php?p=186​89242&i=i104746467
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing

And they are both 300ppi.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:54 |  #22

digital paradise wrote in post #18689257 (external link)
It does? It changes the PPI when you use a save command? Not sure about that. If I use the Image Size command in PS and change the PPI I'm pretty sure it stays that way.

I'm pretty sure I used LR when I exported the original set of ducks.

If you do Save As, it will keep PPI settings: Export doesn’t by default.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 09:58 |  #23

I just opened one of the duck images in PS and the resize command does say 300. I have not used that command since getting PC CC. I changed it to 240 PPI and opened a different file and you are correct - it was at 300 again. Sorry about that.

So it it looks like it does default to 300 every time. I don't remember it doing that many years ago. Either way I can assure you I exported both sets of the examples at 0 and 1000 PPI. Looks like PS wants to set them at 300 when you checked them. Also I can find multiple references that will say PPI does not effect screen resolution. When I took a PS course in 2005 they told us 72 but that was incorrect.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by digital paradise.
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:00 |  #24

john crossley wrote in post #18689258 (external link)
And they are both 300ppi.

Because PS wants to export them at 300 PPI by default so that is why you see 300. If you like I'll do it in real time, take screen shots of the PPI I exported at and post the images.

I can assure you they were exported at 0 and 1000.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canongear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
327 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Apr 2011
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:07 |  #25

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #18688774 (external link)
Your attempt at biting wit aside, calling the printer is the correct answer.

I have outsourced traditional offset, flexography, digital toner based, inkjet, dye sub, screen printing, and more for single sheets, short run books, catalogs, stationary, point of purchase, banners, trade show booths and so on.

Call the printer.

Sorry, your initial reply kind of struck me the wrong way.
I sort of took it as a don't bother wasting our time kind of thing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:21 |  #26

LR seems to work differently. I went to the export page and it was 300. I set it to 100 and exported an image. I opened another file, went to the esport page and it stayed at 100. I guess that is the difference between PS an LR. PS does not have an exporting process that combines resizing, sharpening, media type and PPI on one page.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4545
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 5 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:21 |  #27

john crossley wrote in post #18689225 (external link)
According to Photoshop they are BOTH at 300PPI.

Yeah, DPP is not the only program that states it wrongly...so does Adobe's Lightroom. Not sure if digital paradise simply made in error in posting two shots with '300' dpi embedded in the Exif data, but I certainly did not make that error in this post.
Here is a shot with lots of textural detail to compare, one JPG exported from Lightroom at 75 dpi and the other JPG exported at 300 dpi, moments apart. Both are 2715 x 1820 pixel files, at 75 dpi and 300 dpi Exif values (verified for X Resolution value and Y Resolution value with Opanda PowerExif)


IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/DPI%2075-1_zpsvjikevny.jpg

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/DPI%20300-1_zps2tjbqz7p.jpg

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16862
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:40 |  #28

Maybe I did. All I know is what I see in the resolution section of LR's export page it shows PPI. There is no option to select DPI, just PPC. I have no idea how to embed anything in the EXIF data. I have never attempted to edit it as I've never had the need to.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:49 |  #29
bannedPermanently

digital paradise wrote in post #18689278 (external link)
LR seems to work differently. I went to the export page and it was 300. I set it to 100 and exported an image. I opened another file, went to the esport page and it stayed at 100. I guess that is the difference between PS an LR. PS does not have an exporting process that combines resizing, sharpening, media type and PPI on one page.

Now export the same image from Lightroom twice. The first at 300ppi and the second at 72ppi open them both in photoshop and view at 100%.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 5 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Aug 21, 2018 10:53 as a reply to  @ NullMember's post |  #30

If the DPI setting actually changes the image resolution accordingly then of course there will be a difference. If DPI doesn't change the HxW size of the image, then it won't do anything at all to the 100% view.

Often resizing tools will try to be "smart" about what it changes if you change one factor over another. They are not all consistent however.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,296 views & 12 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Resizing / Printing Images Question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1626 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.