Sep 08, 2018 23:15 | #16 When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras ![]() More info | Sep 09, 2018 02:41 | #17 ^Frank read that report. 500PF looking better all the time. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Choderboy I like a long knob ![]() More info | Looking forward to see how you find the 500 PF. I think 'the 500 Gerry' would be a suitable moniker. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2018 13:49 | #19 Well, this image; GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2018 13:59 | #20 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18704211 ![]() Well, this image; https://3.img-dpreview.com …/3889977670/IMG_3789.jpeg ![]() ... is far better than the pure white background side by side shots we see from Nikon,. having a human and camera bodies really shows the size difference. That man looks sexy. Maybe because he's sporting Nikon:p Support the forums - donate here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras ![]() More info | Sep 10, 2018 02:43 | #22 Choderboy wrote in post #18704006 ![]() Looking forward to see how you find the 500 PF. I think 'the 500 Gerry' would be a suitable moniker. You know, Geriatric... (a club that I am fast approaching membership) Choder I'm really curious about it. ![]() ![]() ![]() The 300PF + 1.4TCiii. Here's what it was cropped from- IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2aQYTds ![]() ![]() ![]() I was nowhere near close. In fact I'd estimate my distance to the bierd at 55-60 yards. I'd gotten an image with the a9 (FF) but there would have been no detail. There is precious little detail with the D500+300PF+1.4tciii but usable for web in my estimation. So in case Sony doesn't give up a mini-A9 I'm covered. The only problem now is that the better-half is fondling the D500 and telling me how much she likes it ![]() flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras ![]() More info | Sep 10, 2018 02:47 | #23 Smithie that size difference might keep me in the game a few more years! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Choderboy I like a long knob ![]() More info | Sep 10, 2018 04:31 | #24 MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18704618 ![]() Choder I'm really curious about it. You know I moved on from the big whites to Sony to save weight. The FE100-400GM's ability to take a 2.0TC has been like sliced bread but F11 is still F11 ![]() I had no intentions of returning to the DSLR world but saw the stats on the 500PF and jumped! The 300PF came a couple a days ago. I guess what I really wanted from Sony to work with the 100-400 was a crop body a9. Seems like Sony is hell bent on full frame developement and I don't have to tell you that APS-C still has merit for wildlife. Here is an example- ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The 300PF + 1.4TCiii. Here's what it was cropped from- ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I was nowhere near close. In fact I'd estimate my distance to the bierd at 55-60 yards. I'd gotten an image with the a9 (FF) but there would have been no detail. There is precious little detail with the D500+300PF+1.4tciii but usable for web in my estimation. So in case Sony doesn't give up a mini-A9 I'm covered. The only problem now is that the better-half is fondling the D500 and telling me how much she likes it ![]()
Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras ![]() More info | Choder, can't say. Haven't shot in that shutter speed range. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2018 23:30 | #26 Choderboy wrote in post #18704647 ![]() Impressive. The only downside of the 300 PF that I have read about is the VR 'dead zone' around 1/120- 1/160 sec shutter speed. Reports vary. It's quite an inconvenient range of shutter speeds if true. Assuming the 500 PF is overall as good as the 300 PF, I'd work around that problem if it exists. I sure hope Nikon fixed the VR problem on the 500mm. I'm interested in this lens for air show photography. Those slow shutter speeds are what I often use to capture prop blur on the WWII birds. When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2018 02:02 | #27 MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18704618 ![]() Choder I'm really curious about it. You know I moved on from the big whites to Sony to save weight. The FE100-400GM's ability to take a 2.0TC has been like sliced bread but F11 is still F11 ![]() I had no intentions of returning to the DSLR world but saw the stats on the 500PF and jumped! The 300PF came a couple a days ago. I guess what I really wanted from Sony to work with the 100-400 was a crop body a9. Seems like Sony is hell bent on full frame developement and I don't have to tell you that APS-C still has merit for wildlife. Here is an example- ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The 300PF + 1.4TCiii. Here's what it was cropped from- ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I was nowhere near close. In fact I'd estimate my distance to the bierd at 55-60 yards. I'd gotten an image with the a9 (FF) but there would have been no detail. There is precious little detail with the D500+300PF+1.4tciii but usable for web in my estimation. So in case Sony doesn't give up a mini-A9 I'm covered. The only problem now is that the better-half is fondling the D500 and telling me how much she likes it ![]() poof knows what's good. heck she married you ^_- "I have applied for jobs at National Geographic, Sports Illustrated and Playboy. The phone should start ringing any minute now" (Curtis N)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras ![]() More info | Sep 11, 2018 02:33 | #28 DTBaan wrote in post #18705356 ![]() poof knows what's good. heck she married you ^_- but the d500 is awesome. sony a7000 is rumored. Haha! She might argue that. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2018 10:14 | #29 MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18705372 ![]() Haha! She might argue that. I thought about the a7000 long and hard. Sold the a6500 prepping for it. Even if Sony gives up a true 'mini-a9' Sony still only has the 400/2.8 I cannot lift or afford. I'm still doing OK with the FE100-400GM weight/size wise. The Nik 500PF is of similar weight so I should be good for a few more years. I think I can handle the 300PF from a wheelchair ![]() I'll still be tempted if the a7000 has the bigger battery, joystick, central viewfinder....but if rangefinder style like the a6xxx series my interest will evaporate. let's hope it doesnt turn into a unicorn :P Support this site - donate here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NorthernFocus Member ![]() More info | Sep 22, 2018 19:25 | #30 So anyone got their hands on one of these yet? Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is marsmith64 725 guests, 146 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |