Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 03 Sep 2018 (Monday) 03:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wide Angle Distortion

 
tuttifrutti
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 03, 2018 03:07 |  #1

Morning all,

Just after a bit of advice please

I have a Canon 16-35mm f/4L which I love to use but on occassions, I get a lot of distortion in the images and i'm wondering why.

I just assume that what I see is what i'm going to get, but apparently not.

First image is the one from the camera, just edited to black and white etc but no adjustment to the distortion, the second is more or less how it looked when I was in the field taking the images (had to amend this in lightroom to get it straight).

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1850/42562172900_f0457d4bf9_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/27R5​gaf  (external link) Newark Priory (external link) by ***tuttifrutti*** (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1872/44322107242_bbf1186f4a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2awA​ojN  (external link) Newark Priory No2 (external link) by ***tuttifrutti*** (external link), on Flickr


So, any ideas why I should get distorted images? I assumed that having a wide angle lens means that I get a lot closer to my subject without issues?

Thanks very much

Ian

Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2058
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
Post edited over 5 years ago by Dan Marchant.
     
Sep 03, 2018 06:04 |  #2

In this case the distortion is, in the main, due to the sensor. What you are seeing is called keystoning; where lines that should be parallel instead converge. The wide angle lens isn't exactly causing it but it is contributing because, as you get closer to the building you have a tendency to start tilting the camera upwards (in order to keep the top of the building in frame). This results in the sensor not being perpendicular to the uprights.

Solutions
The only way to prevent this is to ensure that the sensor remains perpendicular to the uprights but this may mean that the top of the building is cut off and that there is too much empty space at the bottom of the frame. This means you have to shoot from further away (so you get the whole building in frame) and then crop off the excess empty space at the bottom of the frame. Alternatively use a tilt-shift lens or do what you did with this shot - fix in post.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Sep 03, 2018 06:21 |  #3

^^^ yup

It has nothing to do with the lens, but the angle of the camera/sensor to the subject. Your brain "corrects" this when in a 3D world but not on a 2D screen.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 03, 2018 06:23 |  #4

Yes either get a 17mm TS or allow a bit of room around the edges, and compensate in post. You actually get keystoning in every image you take where the back of the camera isn't vertical. It's just that it is often not nearly so pronounced. At least it is a lot easier to fix today with often a single click of the "auto" button in Lr. I remember that in the darkroom you needed to tilt the masking frame in the opposite direction, and hope you could stop down enough on the enlarger to build a little depth of field to cover that tilt.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuttifrutti
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
619 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 460
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire UK
     
Sep 03, 2018 06:40 as a reply to  @ BigAl007's post |  #5

Thanks very much everyone, for your replies.

Makes sense now you've pointed it out to me.

I'll have move back a little more when taking the shots. I'll just need to make sure I use a tripod and keep things steady to keep the details being further away.

The one I did correct just had enough space either side to be able to correct and crop so I think I got lucky there as I don't want to be going back to a 'private no trespassing' field again full of cattle ;)


Hello...
My name's Ian and i'm a photography junkie :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,502 views & 4 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Wide Angle Distortion
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1059 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.