-= Canon EOS R owners unite! Post photos and discuss.

Pondrader wrote in post #18860358
The 100-400II is a smasher of a lens... As long as I’m shooting Canon I will own one. Mine is from release of the lens.

Most all these images are 100-400II with the 1.4III extender. All these image are kinda showing you what the R does without my help in Lightroom on the iMac.

Hosted photo: posted by Pondrader in
./showthread.php?p=188​60358&i=i178219625
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

One thing keeping me from going a head and snatching one up is the 300mm f/4L is and the 70-200mm f/2.8L is ii and 1.4x tc ii

But the convenience of carrying just a 24-105 f/4L is (first version) and the 100-400 sounds good also.

Also tossing the idea around of some seriously wide aperture glass.

But I've been trying to use what I got. I've been experimenting with film again also.

wxjef wrote in post #18860392
One thing keeping me from going a head and snatching one up is the 300mm f/4L is and the 70-200mm f/2.8L is ii and 1.4x tc ii

But the convenience of carrying just a 24-105 f/4L is (first version) and the 100-400 sounds good also.

Also tossing the idea around of some seriously wide aperture glass.

But I've been trying to use what I got. I've been experimenting with film again also.

A lot of people love the 300mm f4. I have only used the 70-300L 4-5.6. I really like it too. The 70-200 with the 1.4III I have never liked for wildlife. IMO the 70-300L out shines.... film for me is a thing of the past.
I do agree about using what you have..

Did some quick shooting this afternoon while wifey was finishing her bike ride. Nothing came out as interesting as I hoped, but I had wanted to try letterboxing and came up with this one. It's at least not bad, I think. Probably means more to me because of having spent a year running track.

A boat...

Photo from LoneRider's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (977010)

Testing the 35 macro

More from the "NASA – A Human Adventure" exhibition currently showing Queensland Museum in Brisbane which runs from 15 March to 9 October 2019.

The vehicle is the un-manned Russian Lunokhod, built by the Soviet Union between 1969 and 1977.

Here is a side-by-side comparison between the wireframe Soviet tyre and the mesh USA NASA Lunar Rover tyres.

Very impressed with the RF 35mm F1.8 and low light capabilities of the EOS R in these quite dark settings.

Cheers

Dennis

Maybe a slightly higher angle of view?
Just asking.

LonelyBoy wrote in post #18860449
Did some quick shooting this afternoon while wifey was finishing her bike ride. Nothing came out as interesting as I hoped, but I had wanted to try letterboxing and came up with this one. It's at least not bad, I think. Probably means more to me because of having spent a year running track.

Hosted photo: posted by LonelyBoy in
./showthread.php?p=188​60449&i=i153063150
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

chuckmiller wrote in post #18860675
Maybe a slightly higher angle of view?
Just asking.

I could try that next time I'm out there, thanks! Are you thinking of making the "1" more legible, or to create the impression of standing on the track? Or both?

This little guy came out while I was on a conference call...

LonelyBoy wrote in post #18860911
This little guy came out while I was on a conference call...

Hosted photo: posted by LonelyBoy in
./showthread.php?p=188​60911&i=i209865872
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

… and promptly bolted, because I'm so scary.

Hosted photo: posted by LonelyBoy in
./showthread.php?p=188​60911&i=i70407893
forum: Canon Digital Cameras

Forgot to keep the SS high enough to get any other decent ones.

That looks dangerously like a Squirrel,carefull now lol,nicely coloured creature.

Lighting provided by a passing truck. He did it so much better than I was able to!

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fPp​yTo

No squirrels, so I've gone with a cat...

A couple recent ones:

I don't have a cat ……...