Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 02 Nov 2018 (Friday) 06:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wide Angle lens

 
CDN_Merlin
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 32
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
     
Nov 02, 2018 06:30 |  #1

Hi all,

I'm looking into buying a WAL and not sure what to get. I currently have a 7D MK2 but in the future I may get a FF camera (5+years).

I have the standard 18-55mm kit lens. It's nice but I'd like better quality and a bit more width.

What lens would your recommend?

I want to take landscape and architecture pictures and try at milky way pics.

My budget would max out at about $1500 taxes in, in Canadian dollars.

Thanks


Canon 7D MK II, Canon 16-35mm F4L, Sigma 150-600mm Sports, Battery Grip, Jobu Design tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 5 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Nov 02, 2018 07:18 |  #2

When you get down to wide angle zooms, the difference between FF and crop with regard to lens design and construction is huge. Meaning, if you buy FF, 16mm is the standard wide end for zooms. There are others that go down to 11, but you start talking about large lenses and real money to get one that doesn't have massive distortion. The angle of view difference between 11 and 16 is way bigger than say 30 and 35.

If you stick with a crop lens design you can get down to 10 mm in a relatively compact design for way cheaper than the 11mm FF equivalent. Canon makes a couple of well regarded 10-something crop zooms. I can never remember which is considered the better lens.

I suggest forgetting about FF for now.

For architecture, distortion free and corner sharpness will be your primary concern. Wide apertures are generally not needed for either architecture or landscape.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 02, 2018 07:25 |  #3

My favorite WA lens for a crop is Canon 10-22. Simply an outstanding lens. For FF I have the 17-40 which a decent enough lens for the cost but I preferred the IQ if the 10-22 over the 17-40. If your willing to shell out more $$, the 16-35s are better lenses but cost much more.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CDN_Merlin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 32
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
     
Nov 02, 2018 08:39 |  #4

So this is the lens you are talking about gjl711?

https://www.henrys.com …2MM-3-5-4-5-USM-LENS.aspx (external link)


Canon 7D MK II, Canon 16-35mm F4L, Sigma 150-600mm Sports, Battery Grip, Jobu Design tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 02, 2018 08:59 |  #5

CDN_Merlin wrote in post #18742150 (external link)
So this is the lens you are talking about gjl711?

https://www.henrys.com …2MM-3-5-4-5-USM-LENS.aspx (external link)

Yes. Optically and outstanding lens. I sold mine when I picked up the 17-40 thinking that a FF with the 17-40 would be better but when looking at images from the 2, I preferred the 10-22. Only real negative, it's and EF-S mount so can't be used on a FF body without modification.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CDN_Merlin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 32
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
     
Nov 02, 2018 09:03 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #6

Thanks for the info


Canon 7D MK II, Canon 16-35mm F4L, Sigma 150-600mm Sports, Battery Grip, Jobu Design tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Nov 02, 2018 09:07 |  #7

Great site for comparing lenses: https://www.the-digital-picture.com …-4.5-5.6-IS-STM-Lens.aspx (external link)

Beside just the write up, has test charts that show distortion and sharpness.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FL-Sean
Member
130 posts
Likes: 1657
Joined Nov 2017
     
Nov 02, 2018 09:14 |  #8

Another vote for the 10-22,really nice on my 80D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wyntastr
Senior Member
Avatar
940 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2062
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
     
Nov 02, 2018 22:21 |  #9

Check out this thread for plenty of samples and testimony heaped on this lens.
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=312255


1D X - 6D - 1D Mk III - Rokinon 8 fisheye - EF 17-40 f/4L - EF 50 f/1.8 Mk I - EF 85 f/1.8 - EF 70-200 f/4L - EF 80-200 f/2.8L Magic Drainpipe - EF 300mm f/2.8 IS L - EF 500mm f/4 IS L - EF 100-400L
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,699 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Wide Angle lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1064 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.