Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Dec 2018 (Friday) 20:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Speed Booster

 
WilsonFlyer
Goldmember
1,251 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 872
Joined Mar 2011
     
Dec 07, 2018 20:02 |  #1

Does anybody think Metabones will ever do a EF-->EF Speedbooster or maybe even an EF-->RF Speedbooster. Canon is bound to have given up a lot of information with the 3 adapters they have just released. All these Manufacturer A to Manufacturer B and nobody's doing anything to help same systems get a whole 'nother stop of light and maybe even more benefit.

Seems a lot of potential revenue is being left on a table that all you'd have to do is rake the money off it.

Why wouldn't somebody do this or tell me why I'm losing my mind and something obvious? Anybody?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,877 posts
Gallery: 821 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5006
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Dec 08, 2018 01:57 |  #2

No idea what a "speed booster" is, but reverse engineering takes time and it's only been weeks since the r system was announced. Give it time...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Dec 08, 2018 04:26 |  #3

No. Speed boosters work when a lens designed for a larger sensor is adapted to a smaller sensor.
eg a lens designed for full frame (35mm) adapted to a micro four thirds sensor. EF and R lenses are designed for the same size sensor.

You could not do EF to EF for both the above reason and also because you can't just add distance between the lens and the sensor. (well you can, but that's an extension tube and you lose the ability to focus at infinity or in the case of some wide angles, lose the ability to focus on anything that is not inside the lens)


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
Post edited over 4 years ago by msowsun.
     
Dec 08, 2018 08:45 as a reply to  @ Choderboy's post |  #4

You also need a closer focal plane distance so EF to EF-S is also not possible.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WilsonFlyer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,251 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 872
Joined Mar 2011
     
Dec 08, 2018 08:54 |  #5

Thanks folks. I knew I was obviously missing something. I just didn't know what it was. Good information.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 4 years ago by Wilt.
     
Dec 08, 2018 11:10 |  #6

The fundamental concept behind a Speedbooster is that it converts the FL of the fundamental optics to a shorter FL, while the aperture of the lens is unaltered. As Metabones claims, "Speed Booster® increases maximum aperture (hence its name), increases MTF and makes lens wider."
Starting with a 50mm f/2 lens, we know its aperture diameter is 25mm. So if we mount a speedbooster that (hypothetically) does 0.7x magnification of the fundamental FL, we end up with 35mm FL with 25mm aperture or 35mm f/1.4.

The patent explains the effects of FL reducers,

"many have wondered why it isn’t possible to build an “inverse” teleconverter that would reduce the focal length...The short answer here is that the reflex mirror of DSLR’s gets in the way, and makes the design of a true general purpose DSLR focal reducer essentially impossible.

... the spectacular rise of so-called mirrorless cameras. Since these cameras have no need for a reflex mirror, they typically have a very short lens flange to image plane distance compared with SLR cameras with a similar image size....The large difference between the flange distance of 35mm SLR cameras and mirrorless cameras allows for the design and implementation of a wide range of adapters to mount SLR lenses onto mirrorless cameras.

...(An) unavoidable consequence of adding a focal reducer is that the new image is reduced in size compared to the original image formed by the objective. ... if a 0.7x focal reducer is added to an objective and the resulting system must cover a DX format sensor with a 28mm diagonal then the objective by itself must be capable of covering a 40mm diagonal format. Fortunately, all fullframe
35mm SLR lenses meet this requirement since they cover a 43.3mm diagonal format.

Kodak made an interesting attempt to design a focal reducer that maintained the working distance required in SLR cameras, but the system was very complex and was completely unsuitable for large apertures. A little over a year ago it dawned on us that mirrorless cameras might offer a unique opportunity to develop a true general purpose photographic focal reducer with full
correction of all aberrations at a very large aperture. Much to our surprise, after a couple of months of frantic design and patent filing effort we had a pair of designs that were promising enough to proceed to the prototype phase. Actual testing of those prototypes fulfilled all of our expectations.
"


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huffy49
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Post edited over 4 years ago by huffy49.
     
Jun 07, 2019 14:10 |  #7

I've had a Metabones Ultra Speedbooster (EF lens to EFM mount) for several weeks now. It's available directly from Metabones through their website (metabones.com) Delivery from Hong Kong took all of 4 days. Works with every Canon EF lens I've tried on it - I have more than a dozen Canon FF lenses going back more than 35 years. It also works well with a Tokina 12-24 APS-C lens, a Tamron 180mm f/3.5, a Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 (a manual focus lens), a Peleng 8mm f/3.5 (ditto). I've done some comparison testing, and in most cases sharpness matches or exceeds the native resolution. It even works well with a 1996 vintage Tamron 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 Aspherical IF LD Super (171D) lens I bought in a bundle with a 50mm f/2.5 Macro and assorted other goodies. The reviews I've read state that the center resolution of the Viltrox is comparable to the Metabones, but in the edge and corner resolution, the Metabones is a LOT better. My favorite combo is the EF 35mm f/2.0 IS , the Metabones Ultra, and the M5. This give me a FF equivalent of a 40mm f/1.4 IS - very useful for existing light work.
For less exacting work, my ancient EF 70-210mm f/4.0 push pull, which is quite mediocre on the M5, becomes a fairly good FF equivalent 80-240mm f/2.8 lens. Yes, what they claim is true here - at equivalent focal lengths, the resolution with lenses such as this actually increases.

I'm quite happy with mine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZoneV
Goldmember
1,644 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 250
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Germany
     
Jun 18, 2019 05:40 |  #8

The speedboosting thing and the relative long flange back distance of the Canon EF mount was the reason while I bought 4 years ago a Sony Alpha 7II.
Since then I use a lot more different speedboosted lenses than with Canon EOS 5D.

Choderboy wrote in post #18766560 (external link)
No. Speed boosters work when a lens designed for a larger sensor is adapted to a smaller sensor.
eg lens designed for full frame (35mm) adapted to a micro four thirds sensor. EF and R lenses are designed for the same size sensor...

While nearly correct, it is not completely exact.
A lot of lenses designed for 24x36mm actually have a lot larger image diameter than 43mm. Beacuse of this I can use for example some Canon FD lenses with 0.7x speedboosting on the my Sony fullframe camera.
Or others use fullframe lenses on GFX "medium" format cameras.


DIY-Homepage (external link) - Image Gallery (external link) - Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Jun 18, 2019 05:43 |  #9

I have the $150 viltrox booster for the M series and it is very nice. It only works with FF image circle lenses, thus not for the EFS lenses which already have image circles just fitting the APSC sensor.

I love my new Sigma 35mm f1.0 lens!

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Church-and-Family/The-Kids/i-wzW4SHg/0/618eb065/X2/IMG_4370a-X2.jpg

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jun 18, 2019 07:15 |  #10

Wilt wrote in post #18766737 (external link)
The fundamental concept behind a Speedbooster is that it converts the FL of the fundamental optics to a shorter FL, while the aperture of the lens is unaltered. As Metabones claims, "Speed Booster® increases maximum aperture (hence its name),

Well, they didn't word that very well. Speed boosters and TCs do not change apertures; they change focal lengths and f-ratios. What they should have said is, "Speed Booster® decreases minimum f-ratio (hence its name)".




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,430 views & 4 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Speed Booster
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1470 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.