Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Dec 2018 (Tuesday) 16:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon Pixma Pro-100 Mistake!

 
ozziepuppy
Goldmember
Avatar
3,286 posts
Gallery: 203 photos
Likes: 1442
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Dec 11, 2018 16:36 |  #1

This morning I was going to print 8 x 10 family photos (Christmas presents) on Canon Pro Platinum Photo Paper on my Canon Pixma Pro-100 printer when I made a horrible mistake. I have never used this paper before and when I loaded the rear tray I inadvertently loaded the piece of cardboard that was inside the plastic along with the photo papers (the photo paper is rather thick and the cardboard is thin & I just didn't notice it). Only after I saw the horrible ink-smeared output did I realize what had happened (see below).

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/12/2/LQ_949614.jpg
Image hosted by forum (949614) © ozziepuppy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

STOP LAUGHING. I MEAN IT.

The paper was literally smeared with gobs of glistening wet ink. I have since spent nearly all day cleaning the printer and looking up information online. So far I have run all of the Canon printer utilities as well as (a) removing the sponge (with ink-soaked spots), washing it, drying it, and reinstalling it; and (b) cleaning ink-smeared areas of plastic with Q-tips & alcohol swabs.

I have run the Bottom Plate Cleaning utility about 50 times and every time I run it I STILL get ink spots on the folded paper that you run through the printer as part of this program (see photo of what I am getting below).

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/12/2/LQ_949615.jpg
Image hosted by forum (949615) © ozziepuppy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

The inside of the printer looks OK, and the other utility programs are coming out OK, but it seems to me that if the bottom plate were actually clean I would be getting clean papers coming out when running the Bottom Plate Cleaning utility. Yet I do not.

Does anyone know if this is normal? I have googled this question and looked at the manual & perused Canon support documents and I can find the procedure for Bottom Plate Cleaning but I can not find whether or not you are supposed to keep doing it until the output paper is clean.

If anyone knows the answer to this I would really appreciate a reply. Otherwise I am going to be running this utility forever in an apparently futile quest for a clean output.

Or writing my runaway best-seller: Really, Really Bad Family Photographs.

Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5909
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Dec 11, 2018 16:42 |  #2

I have no suggestions, sorry. Neat ART though.


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lacogada
Senior Member
574 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 199
Joined May 2015
     
Dec 11, 2018 17:37 |  #3

STOP LAUGHING. I MEAN IT.

Or writing my runaway best-seller: Really, Really Bad Family Photographs.

Can't help, sorry.

.... but love the humor !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,783 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1285
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
Dec 11, 2018 18:26 |  #4

I think it would have been better if you didn't crop the left and right so much. ;-)a


Bob
R6II, R6, EF 16-35L II 2.8, EF 24-70L II 2.8, RF 50 1.8, EF 100L Macro 2.8, RF 70-200L 2.8, EF 100-400L II, EF 200-400L 4, EF 1.4xIII, EF 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30, LRCC, PSCC
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link) | Instagram @bobpal

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icopus
Am I psychic or what?!?
Avatar
3,173 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 1152
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In the shadows of Houston
     
Dec 11, 2018 20:10 |  #5

I have a 9000 mkii. I once loaded photo paper so that it printed on the back side. I had also tried to use generic ink in the MX522.
In both cases, my results were similar to yours.
And after similar cleaning, I too, had similar results with the folded paper, though not quite as bad as yours.
I gave up and tried printing a simple 6x4 photo in each printer and they came out fine.
That was several years ago and I've not had any issues since.
Hope this helps somehow.
Best of luck to you.


It's my life and I'll get pissed if I want to.
"Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn't mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar." - E.R. Murrow

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozziepuppy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,286 posts
Gallery: 203 photos
Likes: 1442
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
Post edited over 4 years ago by ozziepuppy with reason 'Remove comma'.
     
Dec 11, 2018 20:45 |  #6

bpalermini wrote in post #18769092 (external link)
I think it would have been better if you didn't crop the left and right so much. ;-)a


Good point. I just took a quick snapshot with my phone so the original wasn't actually cropped. Also, the ink has dried now (although the paper is kind of curled) so it looks a LOT better. Perhaps I can use this one as a Christmas present after all. Now that it is dry, it is unlikely that anyone will even notice that there was a problem with the printer.

Here is the dry, uncropped version. MUCH better, yes?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/12/2/LQ_949639.jpg
Image hosted by forum (949639) © ozziepuppy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.


Although I don't think I will save this one to my Gallery. Wouldn't want to show off.

Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozziepuppy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,286 posts
Gallery: 203 photos
Likes: 1442
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Dec 11, 2018 21:03 |  #7

icopus wrote in post #18769124 (external link)
I have a 9000 mkii. I once loaded photo paper so that it printed on the back side. I had also tried to use generic ink in the MX522.
In both cases, my results were similar to yours.
And after similar cleaning, I too, had similar results with the folded paper, though not quite as bad as yours.
I gave up and tried printing a simple 6x4 photo in each printer and they came out fine.
That was several years ago and I've not had any issues since.
Hope this helps somehow.
Best of luck to you.


Thanks for your reply. Now I don't feel so alone. I have probably used up almost a ream of paper with the Bottom Plate Cleaning utility and I am still getting ink smears. To add insult to injury, three (yes THREE) of the Pro-100's ink tanks went completely dry today: Blue, Yellow, and Magenta. I had replacement cartridges (genuine Canon ink) on hand, but unfortunately I installed Photo Magenta instead of Magenta, prompting an error message from the printer and necessitating taking out the 2nd Photo Magenta & installing a new Magenta (here's hoping the Photo Magenta cartridge doesn't go dry before the Photo Magenta runs out). I have to say that today has just not gone well at all.

I also finally decided to try printing something (other than the folded paper Rorschach Test--er, I mean, folded paper from the Bottom Plate Cleaning utility) even though all of the folded papers were still coming out very streaked. First, I printed a wimpy little word processing document ("This is a test") and that came out OK, so then I tried printing a sheet of Avery stickers and they came out OK as well. My next task will be to try printing out an actual photo to see what happens.

Of course, if the new photos all come out fine, all of the other recipients will probably be disappointed that they did not get the "artsy" one.


Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
showed up to keep the place interesting
44,018 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2462
Joined Sep 2007
     
Dec 11, 2018 21:41 |  #8

I've printed on the wrong side of a 13x19 sheet of luster, print was smudged and wet similar to yours.. I didn't do any special cleaning, just stuck a new piece in and hit print. Turned out flawless.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozziepuppy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,286 posts
Gallery: 203 photos
Likes: 1442
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
     
Dec 12, 2018 00:06 |  #9

That's awesome.

Apparently I didn't ruin my printer and won't have to run folded papers through it forever and ever, hopelessly waiting for one to emerge without ink stains.

:-):-):-)

Because I really, really didn't want to have to do that.


Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SereneSpeed
Goldmember
1,081 posts
Likes: 2535
Joined Jan 2013
Post edited over 4 years ago by SereneSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Dec 12, 2018 02:07 |  #10

I skipped the replies, so sorry if you have a solution already, but it looks to me like your paper is not flat.

I had this issue and went nuts until I figured out it was just a VERY light bend in the paper.

Try new paper. Once the photo paper bends, it's tough to get it flat again.

Okay, just scrolled up and re-read your post. Have you tried printing since sending through the cardboard?

Your printer is probably fine!

I sent paper through upside down at least once a year :-) Same (ish) result.

If you get smears like that on photo paper, it's (most likely) because it warped.

Yes, you will get that with folded paper. It's going to press places it shouldn't.

EDIT TO ADD: That printer is a tank! I wish I'd kept mine when I upgraded to the Prograf1000. The Pro-100 is by far the best bang for the buck printer!


https://www.danbcreati​ve.com (external link) - Commercial Work
http://unabashedbeauty​.com (external link) - Boudoir/NSFW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lacogada
Senior Member
574 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 199
Joined May 2015
     
Dec 12, 2018 02:22 |  #11

ozziepuppy wrote in post #18769151 (external link)
Good point. I just took a quick snapshot with my phone so the original wasn't actually cropped. Also, the ink has dried now (although the paper is kind of curled) so it looks a LOT better. Perhaps I can use this one as a Christmas present after all. Now that it is dry, it is unlikely that anyone will even notice that there was a problem with the printer.

Here is the dry, uncropped version. MUCH better, yes?

Hosted photo: posted by ozziepuppy in
./showthread.php?p=187​69151&i=i131103266
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing


Although I don't think I will save this one to my Gallery. Wouldn't want to show off.

:lol::lol::lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moose10101
registered smartass
1,778 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 334
Joined May 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Dec 12, 2018 08:55 |  #12

Now I know how this happened:

IMAGE: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/61/Attempted_restoration_of_Ecce_Homo.jpg

Sorry, I hope your prints clear up, but I have no self-control.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Dec 12, 2018 10:01 |  #13

ozziepuppy wrote in post #18769151 (external link)
Good point. I just took a quick snapshot with my phone so the original wasn't actually cropped. Also, the ink has dried now (although the paper is kind of curled) so it looks a LOT better. Perhaps I can use this one as a Christmas present after all. Now that it is dry, it is unlikely that anyone will even notice that there was a problem with the printer.

Here is the dry, uncropped version. MUCH better, yes?

Hosted photo: posted by ozziepuppy in
./showthread.php?p=187​69151&i=i131103266
forum: RAW, Post Processing & Printing


Although I don't think I will save this one to my Gallery. Wouldn't want to show off.


Location says "Kansas" but the family is from 3 mile island?

Sorry, I could not help myself.


I have made this same mistake,.. :rolleyes:
I gave up on cleaning (in fact I don't think i even knew about the plate cleaning you are doing) and just went back to printing with correct paper and all has been good since.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,597 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1542
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Dec 12, 2018 10:18 |  #14

Make sure all of the rollers are clean and do not have ink smeared on them:

https://www.lightroomq​ueen.com …n-interior-rollers.22767/ (external link)

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozziepuppy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,286 posts
Gallery: 203 photos
Likes: 1442
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Kansas
Post edited over 4 years ago by ozziepuppy with reason 'Adding an update'.
     
Dec 12, 2018 11:54 |  #15

kirkt wrote in post #18769428 (external link)
Make sure all of the rollers are clean and do not have ink smeared on them:

https://www.lightroomq​ueen.com …n-interior-rollers.22767/ (external link)

kirk

I read the information in the link with interest and will try the alcohol-soaked paper and the new black ink cartridge (although given the timing I don't think it is the black ink cartridge).

Yes, I have run all of the Canon cleaning utilities repeatedly. The folded paper is required for the Bottom Plate Cleaning utility.

Since the page of stickers and the test Word document both printed out OK yesterday, it is possible that this morning's problem (see photo below: all four corners of the 8 x 10 were smeared with ink) MIGHT be the result of non-flat photo paper--although it seems unlikely because the package is brand new.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/12/2/LQ_949750.jpg
Image hosted by forum (949750) © ozziepuppy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

I really thought I would wake up this morning and print out all of my 8 x 10 flawless prints and get them packaged to mail to family members today.:-(

OK, I'm off to try more things. To those of you whose printers were all just fine and printed flawlessly after a similar ink mishap, you DID give me hope, and I thank you for that!

False hope. :rolleyes:

But much appreciated, nonetheless!

I will check back in after trying out the additional suggestions.

---------------

Update:

OK, I tried the alcohol-soaked paper and it wouldn't feed through the printer, even though I had blotted it to be sure it wasn't too soaking wet. However, I think the paper I used wasn't strong enough because it kind of bunched up and I got an error message. I decided to hold off on trying that solution (so to speak :lol: ) for now.

Because of the possible curled or non-flat paper issue, I switched back to the 13 x 19 Luster Pro paper and used a layout that put two 8 x 10 photos on one 13 x 19 sheet. That printed out without any smears! I will have to cut it to make the 8 x 10's but that is a small price to pay for not having any ink smears. I kind of liked the Luster Pro better than the Pro Platinum anyway, and now I REALLY like it better.

So for now I am going to assume that this morning's problem was due to the Pro Platinum paper not being completely flat, and move forward finishing the photo presents using the Luster Pro.

Thank you all so much for your comments and assistance with this problem. :-D:-D:-D

Marci
Constructive criticism always appreciated.
Gear
Pre-2018 Feedback :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,706 views & 34 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
Canon Pixma Pro-100 Mistake!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1207 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.