Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 09 Jan 2019 (Wednesday) 20:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Metering mode for sports?

 
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2058
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
Post edited over 4 years ago by Dan Marchant.
     
Mar 20, 2019 23:52 |  #16

KIPAX wrote in post #18831786 (external link)
No matter how many times i read it.. I still get this:)
For me the metering mode is irrelevant. Shooting sports (unless going for fancy blur shots or something) .

It's the blur.. thats not metering :)

That's because you ignored half the sentence and ignored the next sentence and just focused on an aside (hence it was in parenthesis) which was just there to clarify an exception.

If you don't ignore one and a half sentences you get....
"Shooting sports, your aperture and shutter speed are set by the need to freeze action*. So, unless the lighting is constantly changing, I just meter off a midtone and shoot a test and check the histogram.

* unless going for fancy blur shots or something."


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Susan ­ Smitha
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
15 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Oct 2018
     
Apr 29, 2019 04:09 |  #17

This guy fight without sticks and helmet

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/04/5/LQ_974740.jpg
Image hosted by forum (974740) © Susan Smitha [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

clipping path company (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edt
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta
Post edited over 3 years ago by edt.
     
May 01, 2020 13:33 |  #18

I typically use Auto ISO in daytime since the light changes with cloud movement and whether I have my back to the sun or not. At night under stadium lights I'm almost always in Manual exposure mode.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
Avatar
2,167 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
     
Jul 19, 2020 04:06 |  #19

duckster wrote in post #18791080 (external link)
Thanks for the comments. Most of my sports shooting is outdoors. I have just noticed that a couple of times when shooting on a slightly overcast day, some of the photos get a little washed out at times. Just a hobby shooter so trying to learn anything I can to make my photos more consistent.

Your scene is dominated by the black running track, meaning AE is compromised.

Suggest Manual Exposure when your lighting is consistent but subject is of varying reflectance.


EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 300/2.8 IS III | 400/2.8 IS III | 500/4 IS III | 600/4 IS III | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 11-24/4 | 16-35/2.8 III | 24-70/2.8 II | 70-200/2.8 IS III | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS II | 200-400/4 IS 1.4x
Sundry: 430EX III-RT | 600EX II-RT | 1.4x III | 2x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duckster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,782 posts
Gallery: 466 photos
Likes: 3880
Joined May 2017
     
Jul 19, 2020 08:23 as a reply to  @ cwphoto's post |  #20

Good point! Thank you. I will have to try that next time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Jul 23, 2020 23:04 as a reply to  @ duckster's post |  #21

Hey... looks like you were having so much fun, I would just jump into the deep end with you all. We are completely ignoring metering method... except in the case of manual. If you use spot, or evaluative, center weighted, partial... etc. What is nice about the newer cameras is if you shoot spot, it will spot meter the same area that the focus point is selected.

Exposure varies widely in field sports... except from 11 to until about 1. Outside of that you will see wider ranges of exposure depending the time of day and position of sun. You can go from complete shade to full sun in one panning motion following a play.

If I am in an auto exposure mode, I always use spot. Uniforms, angle to the sun, venue shading, are lights augmenting.... or whether it is cloudy, or clear skies... it all depends.

With new cameras and their improved dynamic range... you really have so much more latitude and can correct easily 1 stop of difference within the image.

For me, I am usually shooting wide open of f2.8...I still set max ISO to 6,000 for most sports... stuff like indoor track is at 12,800... and let the shutter be what it will be. I know others like to lock in a shutter speed and go with variable ISO.

No right or wrong... but for me... spot or zone metering.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duckster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,782 posts
Gallery: 466 photos
Likes: 3880
Joined May 2017
     
Jul 24, 2020 13:27 as a reply to  @ Croasdail's post |  #22

Thank you for that explanation!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AntonLargiader
Goldmember
Avatar
3,127 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 418
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Charlottesville, VA
     
Apr 13, 2022 07:33 |  #23

Older post I know but I switched away from spot metering for action. Too easy for the exposure to be affected by apparel (white top with dark shorts) or the BG if the athlete moves a lot. Spot is WAY too spot.

I switched to evaluative but after reviewing the manual center-weighted or partial might be better. I suppose it depends a bit on the background; I don't want the exposure to be affected a lot by averaging the sky in, but I mostly want a balanced exposure on the overall athlete.

There are times when fixed exposure works but for me they are not so common. Yesterday I was at school and there was cloud variation, night lighting variation, and a lot of direct sunlight/shade variation as the soccer players ran toward and away from the setting sun. However, for less dynamic stuff (like shooting runners during the day, or a static angle on gymnastics) manual has worked well. There the BG and incident light aren't really changing and you can let the camera stop being fooled by changes in apparel color.

I think I'll try a few different modes and see how they work. Friday I should have a lot of opportunities.


Image editing and C&C always OK
Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . TT1/TT5 . Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duckster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,782 posts
Gallery: 466 photos
Likes: 3880
Joined May 2017
     
Apr 13, 2022 09:55 |  #24

A couple of recent track meets have been mid-day, very sunny which is a tough condition




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,205 views & 7 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
Metering mode for sports?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1472 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.