Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
Thread started 17 Jan 2019 (Thursday) 08:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
TOGGLE RATINGS BETWEEN ALL AND Zakna (showing now: Zakna)
Overall Rating9.5
Overall Image Quality10
Value for Money10
Bokeh10
Sharpness10
Contrast10
Focusing9.5
Must Have10
Suitability to Intended Use10
Got What I Expected10
Ownership Status: "own"

Click here for sample photos and more info.
Click ratings to see total averages and rating distributions.
List all reviews of Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM | S

Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM | S, reviewed by Zakna

 
Zakna
Junior Member
20 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Jan 17, 2019 08:34 |  #1

Sigma 70 - 200 F/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport Review

A little history about my photography experience. Last year I was still using the Canon 5dm3 + 6D and I was waiting for the next greatest thing from Canon. Unfortunately nothing materialized. The 6D2 is a step back and the 5D4 was too much for too little. Sony then revealed the A7III. That body gave you pretty much everything I wanted in the 6D2 but unfortunately Canon didn't make it nor did they price it. I prompty pre-ordered the lens and got it 1st day on release in North America. The EOSR was underwhelming so I picked up the A7RIII to complement my A7III. All my lenses are still EF mount in case Canon came out with anything competitive but I switched out some of my lense for more Sony friendly Sigma EF mounts. From all the reviews I read and watched, Sigma's Art line + mc-11 was pretty much on par with the E mount version of the same lens. The only difference was focus noise in video. Optic wise Sigma lenses was either on par or a step ahead of Sony's lens of that focal range. Since I have no ambition to record video it was a no brainer for me.

The 2 most versatile lense are the 24-70 f/2.8 and the 70-200 f/2.8. I own both Canon's version IIs and will be keeping the EF 24-70 f/2.8 L II I because it still focuses fast, accurate and quick while offering the best image quality out of any brand's 24-70 f/2.8, including Sony's GM. Unfortunately the Sigma 24-70 F/2.8 Art is the only dud of their Art line up and will not make it into my line up as well.

My EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS L II would sometimes hunt forever and will not acquire a lock. It was infuriating to have one of the better 70-200s but not be able to use it to it's full capacity. Luckily Sigma announced a refresh of their 70-200 and re branded into their Sports/Art line. Since the lens is so new and I have not seen any review from a Sony user's perspective, so I'd give it a go.

Autofocus

Tested on my Sony A7RIII v2.1 + MC11 v1.4.1
I used 3 lenses for AF tracking comparison.
Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II (1.49kg)
Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport (1.8kg)
Sony 85 f/1.8 FE


The Sony 85 f/1.8 is one of the quickest AF on the Sony body, I do not have lens that focus faster than this one. It would lock on quick and fast on the very 1st try, no hunting. I had no issues locking on to anything expect in really harsh back lighting.
I would rate it a 10/10

The Canon IIL if it can resolve would lock on pretty quick too 9/10, but when it can't it will hunt indefinitely. You really cannot tell when it will hunt, it just happens and you will miss your shot. I was at a fashion show event and ending up switching to my 105 f/1.4 Art because of the focusing issues. 0/10 when it cannot resolve.

The Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 Sport would track pretty well in great lighting 9 to 9.5/10. It can still get confused with weird lighting, non hard edged or non-distinct shapes. 4/10 in those situations but it will slowly lock on though. Full AF options are open to this lens including lock on AF. It will track a person or a car going down the street on continuous.

Unfortunately I do not have access to a Sony 70-200 F/2.8 GM to test out and compare it with these against the Canon or Sigma.

You can make AF faster with the Sigma dock and assigning it to one of the custom toggles. It makes the AF a small % faster than without it enabled. Since I own the dock this is not an issue, but if you do not own one you will need to purchase one or ask someone to help you out. This should of been automatically set up as Custom C1 out of the factory.

Video AF works as the Canon version does not so there is not much more for me to go into on this. I have the 85 f/1.8 FE to do video if I really wanted to get a tight video show that auto focuses and that would be better for video than a zoom anyways. The option is there if you chose to use this lens though.

Canon extenders AF

1.4x - very quick, works fine 8/10
2x - much slower AF than when I remember the 70-200 + 2x on my 5dm3 5/10

Flaring

Has better flare resistance than the Canon EF 70 -200 f/2.8 II as I tested this against the Canon f/2.8 II. I do not have the version III to test out but I believe that lens would beat the Sigma. 9/10



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Sigma Left - Canon Right

Focus Breathing

This lens has no focus breathing. It is fractionally better than the legendary Canon in this regards. Either it's a bit longer than 200mm or the Canon isn't fully 200mm. Either way your subject will be a tiny bit bigger at closest distance. I think only the Sony GM, the Canon's and now this lens are the only ones with no focus breathing issues. 10/10



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Also notice the buttery smooth bokeh.

Sigma Left - Canon Right

Image Stabilization

4 stops worth and it also works in conjunction with Sony's IBIS this should be even better than Tamron's 70-200 G2 on a Canon body. 10/10

Optical Quality / Sharpness

It's pretty much on par or sharper than my Canon EF 70-200, and that's saying a lot as Canon didn't change their optics when they refreshed it to version III. Great edge to edge sharpness right at f/2.8. Minor improvements at f/4 to f/8. I had a whole bunch of side by side comparison on a resolution chart but due to my novice testing I couldn't see any difference or if I did it was negligible. 10/10

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Photo from Zakna's gallery.



Other features

3 Focus hold button can be reassigned to whatever you want on the Sony body. Eye AF, Focus hold, AF on, or whatever else is in their custom button menu. Each button does the same thing though.

Custom toggle C1/C2 can be pre-programmed with quicker/smoother AF / focus range limitered / and smoother IS?

IS mode has off / on / panning only IS

Removeable Arcaswiss foot attached to tripod collar. You do not need external mounting plate unless you have a totally different tripod head.

Value & Conclusion

At the time of writing I did a quick check on B&H for their prices. There are no other 70-200 f/2.8 for Sony beside's Sony's own with a native mount.

Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM + MC11 = $1350
Tamron SP 70-200 F/2.8 Di VC G2 + MC11 = $1550
Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport + MC11 = $1750
Canon EF 70-200 F/2.8 L IS II + MC11 = $2050
Canon EF 70-200 F/2.8 L IS III + MC11 = $2350
Sony FE 70-200 GM OSS = $2600

Out of those 6 lenses, I believe only 2, the new Sigma and the Sony have competitive and accurate AF. If you already own the MC-11 adapter, it's a no brainer going with the Sigma. It's pretty like night and day between my Canon LII lens and the new Sigma Sport version. Don't get me wrong. The Canon does focus and focuses well when it resolves the subject. It's the not knowing if you next shot will focus that really is what gives it a failing grade on a Sony body. It's still an excellent lens for Canon bodies and I will sell mine to someone that can use it to it's full potential. It's been sitting on my shelf since I purchased my Sony bodies. I'm glad that Sigma gave us something that is pretty comparable to the top 70-200 out there. The only negative I can see is the weight and the bigger filter size.

Sony α7RIII flickr (external link)
Sony FE 28F/2 / FE 85F/1.8 / FE 100-400F/4.5-5.6 GM OSS
Canon EF 24-70F/2.8LII / EF 100-400F/4.5-5.6LISII / EF 100F/2.8LIS Macro / EF 40F/2.8 Pancake / 1.4EXII / 2.0EXIII
Sigma 24 F/1.4A / 35 F/1.4A / 50F/1.4A / 105F/1.4A / 14-24F/2.8A / 70-200F/2.8S / 2xSigma MC-11 EF -> E

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zakna
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
20 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Post edited 23 days ago by Zakna.
     
Jan 23, 2019 07:25 |  #2

Since I haven't seen much info on this elsewhere, here ya go.

I have uploaded some videos showing AF speeds.

All shot with Sony A7R3 + MC11 + Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 Sport + fastest AF mode (dock customized) + expandable flexible spot

Infinity to closest range in AFS



AFS between some objects at range
It's quite quick but it always focus out and back in



AFC between some objects at range


Sony α7RIII flickr (external link)
Sony FE 28F/2 / FE 85F/1.8 / FE 100-400F/4.5-5.6 GM OSS
Canon EF 24-70F/2.8LII / EF 100-400F/4.5-5.6LISII / EF 100F/2.8LIS Macro / EF 40F/2.8 Pancake / 1.4EXII / 2.0EXIII
Sigma 24 F/1.4A / 35 F/1.4A / 50F/1.4A / 105F/1.4A / 14-24F/2.8A / 70-200F/2.8S / 2xSigma MC-11 EF -> E

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rssmps
Member
103 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jan 26, 2019 03:52 |  #3

Could you try some sports action shots? Would love to see how the AF works in those situations.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDL
Senior Member
449 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Post edited 19 days ago by DDL.
     
Jan 27, 2019 00:18 as a reply to  @ rssmps's post |  #4

Tried action shots tracking dogs at the off leash area

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1503861


DDL

GearList

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

404 views & 3 likes for this thread
Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM | S, reviewed by Zakna
FORUMS Gear Reviews Lens Reviews 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is satcat
986 guests, 386 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.