even the casual observer knows that numbers have collapsed; good news for car windscreens, not so good for the eco system
https://www.theguardian.com …reaten-collapse-of-nature![]()

racketman Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 10, 2019 15:39 | #1 even the casual observer knows that numbers have collapsed; good news for car windscreens, not so good for the eco system Toby
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NullMember Goldmember 3,019 posts Likes: 1130 Joined Nov 2009 More info | Feb 10, 2019 16:46 | #2 Permanentlyracketman wrote in post #18808577 even the casual observer knows that numbers have collapsed; good news for car windscreens, not so good for the eco system https://www.theguardian.com …reaten-collapse-of-nature What's the last thing to go through an insects mind when it hits the windscreen of your car; it's arse.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Feb 11, 2019 02:17 | #3 Yes it is shocking, places that just 5 years ago were literally buzzing with pollinators are silent now. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
avondale87 thanks for whoever started this More info | Feb 11, 2019 02:35 | #4 on the flip side there are some industries here pushing for pest control using insects once shunned.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2019 04:28 | #5 PermanentlyIt's not difficult to see why this story isn't getting traction. For many years now, our governments and media have been forecasting doom and disaster daily, whether it's vanishing polar bears, destruction of the Great Barrier Reef or failing grain harvests - all of which were patently untrue. Remember the Millennium Bug? What a fizzer. Mad Cow Disease and the thousands of deaths we were going to see? Peak oil anybody? 5D3, 7D2, EF 16-35 f/2.8L, EF 24-70 f/2.8L II, EF 24-105 f/4L, EF 70-200 f/2.8L II, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II, EF 1.4x III, Sigma 150mm macro, Lumix LX100 plus a cupboard full of bags, tripods, flashes & stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pippan Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 11, 2019 04:59 | #6 racketman wrote in post #18808577 even the casual observer knows that numbers have collapsed; good news for car windscreens, not so good for the eco system https://www.theguardian.com …reaten-collapse-of-nature While I don't doubt that we humans have treated the environment in which we live appallingly, I think statements like: "The total mass of insects is falling by a precipitous 2.5% a year, according to the best data available, suggesting they could vanish within a century", are somewhat far-fetched. Insects have been major players in the Earth's ecosystem for some 500 million years and have survived all the catastrophes that have caused the other mass extinctions. With their very quick life-cycles and vast numbers of progeny, they are uniquely placed to evolve characteristics that will enable them to survive and flourish again. Humans—maybe not so much. Still waiting for the wisdom they promised would be worth getting old for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Choderboy I like a long knob More info | Feb 11, 2019 12:54 | #7 Spencerphoto wrote in post #18808907 It's not difficult to see why this story isn't getting traction. For many years now, our governments and media have been forecasting doom and disaster daily, whether it's vanishing polar bears, destruction of the Great Barrier Reef or failing grain harvests - all of which were patently untrue. Remember the Millennium Bug? What a fizzer. Mad Cow Disease and the thousands of deaths we were going to see? Peak oil anybody? So, when a real threat emerges (which insect extinctions might prove to be) I can't really blame people for not taking it seriously. Remember the boy who cried wolf. The US spent 100 Billion dollars to avoid problems due to Millennium bug. Australia spent 12 Billion. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2019 13:53 | #8 Permanent banThe Guardian isn't a reliable source. And we don't need more legislation, either. 'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | Feb 11, 2019 16:21 | #9 Regulatory capture is at work here, it's a sad state of affairs. Alveric wrote in post #18809151 The Guardian isn't a reliable source. And we don't need more legislation, either. you must have the guardian confused with some other source, it is very reliable. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
keeperseeker Cream of the Crop More info | You can stick your head in the sand,,,or other places as far as you want,,,,people's ignorance of the facts and reality does not change reality and the facts to suit your Ignorance. Maybe instead of wasting your time posting things that truly conflict with the truth,,,you,,and others that refuse to look at,,comprehend and appreciate what is happening in our world might utilize your time better by actually reading the research that has been done then taking a "ignorance is bliss " approach. Either way,,,,you will feel the consequences along with the rest of us ! Never make a decision when you have to pee. L Cohen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Feb 11, 2019 17:26 | #11 Lester Wareham wrote in post #18808877 Yes it is shocking, places that just 5 years ago were literally buzzing with pollinators are silent now. The speed of decline is horrifying. The seriousness of the threat is grave, even those cognisant of the issues I suspect under estimate the near term threat. Of course as always the ligistatiors seem oblivious. I was in grade school when I realized that life on earth as we know it hinges on these little critters survival. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info Post edited over 4 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. | Feb 11, 2019 17:31 | #12 Sorry I had not read ahead when I posted my first reply, to see that sadly this thread had already jumped the shark on taking a very real issue, that relies on fact and science, and gotten twisted into bullsugar politics. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Feb 12, 2019 03:34 | #13 Spencerphoto wrote in post #18808907 It's not difficult to see why this story isn't getting traction. For many years now, our governments and media have been forecasting doom and disaster daily, whether it's vanishing polar bears, destruction of the Great Barrier Reef or failing grain harvests - all of which were patently untrue. Remember the Millennium Bug? What a fizzer. Mad Cow Disease and the thousands of deaths we were going to see? Peak oil anybody? So, when a real threat emerges (which insect extinctions might prove to be) I can't really blame people for not taking it seriously. Remember the boy who cried wolf. And on the mad cow thing the UK destroyed, burnt and buried many complete farm stocks of cattle. One wonders if the fields used still have a bio-hazard warning. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LesterWareham Moderator More info | Feb 12, 2019 03:38 | #14 Alveric wrote in post #18809151 The Guardian isn't a reliable source. And we don't need more legislation, either. The Guardian is a decent paper but I agree not a peer reviewed journal. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1317 guests, 113 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||