Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Feb 2019 (Monday) 09:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Print Evaluation Light Box--Rethinking Color Temperature

 
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Feb 11, 2019 09:17 |  #1

Like a lot of people, I have always evaluated my prints under a carefully selected "daylight" light source.

I'm rethinking that.

None of my customers is going to display their portraits under a daylight source at 5000K. And most daylight sources are deleterious to prints anyway.

So why should I evaluate the print under daylight?

I'm thinking now about setting my reference light source color temperature at 3000K or 4000K, or building something I can switch between 3000K, 4000K, and 5000K, depending on how I know a particular product is going to be displayed.

Thoughts? Has anyone already done this?


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 4 years ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all)
     
Feb 11, 2019 15:30 |  #2

If you view a 'daylight white' patch under 3000K light, it will have an orangish (warm) appearance that your brain accepts as 'white'. If you have a critical eye, you will know 'warm lighting'.

The danger of print evaluation under a warm light is that you might not be able to judge with accuracy what is truly neutral, and you might correct to overly warm/cool final print. OTOH, if as you say "your clients don't evaluate under neutral conditions either, does it really matter?!" Hard to argue against that.

Put another way, if we cannot control if our clients use overly cool monitors or overly warm monitors or even ones that have an off tint to evaluate our images, "Does it really matter" that we correct our images to neutral? I still say, 'Yes' because we do not want a critical eye with a neutral set of evaluation conditions to find fault with our inappropriately adjusted image!

Does it truly matter? I'd say "Probably it does not truly matter...as color printers judging color balance in our darkrooms and less than perfect print viewing conditions (open window light can be remarkably cool or warm, depending upon weather and time of day) we got along for decades for most circumstances. But as 'keeper of the faith' we owe it to others to get it as close as we can, and be the bearer of the standard.

And deleterious conditions are not 'daylight'...it is ALL bright light!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redcrown
Senior Member
351 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Dec 2008
     
Feb 12, 2019 00:04 |  #3

You are chasing a ghost trying to find a one size fits all solution. Unless you know the conditions where a print will hang, and can edit for those exact conditions, there is no solution.

My prints hang on several relative's home walls. Some have simple tungsten lamps. Some have LED track lights, maybe a little florescent. My biggest problem is that many hang in fairly dark areas. If I had known I would have cranked the brightness way up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Feb 12, 2019 00:44 |  #4

Yes. Daylight.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2058
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Feb 12, 2019 02:05 |  #5

Plus of course there may be a large part of the day when the artificial lights are off. My bedroom, living room and dinning room have adequate window light during the day. The lights only go on in the afternoon/evening.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 12, 2019 02:25 |  #6

If you are evaluating the print strictly on its own merits, you can do whatever you like. However if you are comparing it to your monitor they should always be the same temp.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

857 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Print Evaluation Light Box--Rethinking Color Temperature
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1454 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.