Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 13 Mar 2019 (Wednesday) 15:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Where do you get prints/ Astrophotography and landscape

 
KDS1
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 218
Joined Dec 2018
Location: Detroit US
     
Mar 13, 2019 15:08 |  #1

I ordered prints from Nations prints and the colors are either too dark or washed out. My astrophotography prints didn’t come out at all. Any tips on who offers quality work and what’s the best way to get stars to pop in prints?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10455
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Mar 13, 2019 15:11 |  #2

Is your monitor calibrated?

If you're sending files that are edited on a monitor that isn't at least semi standardized then the prints will look....not great.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 13, 2019 15:11 |  #3

I'm not sure if you have a Costco in your area but I have had really good results from them. (not astro, but many landscapes and portraits) Their auto correction is ok but you can look up your stores printer profile and finalize your image to their printer for the best results.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2058
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Mar 13, 2019 19:23 |  #4

saea501 wrote in post #18828277 (external link)
Is your monitor calibrated?

If you're sending files that are edited on a monitor that isn't at least semi standardized then the prints will look....not great.

^^ This.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KDS1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 218
Joined Dec 2018
Location: Detroit US
     
Mar 14, 2019 02:03 |  #5

saea501 wrote in post #18828277 (external link)
Is your monitor calibrated?

If you're sending files that are edited on a monitor that isn't at least semi standardized then the prints will look....not great.

No, It isn’t. I am visually impaired so everything on my Mac is enlarged for better viewing. Can you offer tips for calibration?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KDS1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 218
Joined Dec 2018
Location: Detroit US
     
Mar 14, 2019 02:04 |  #6

gjl711 wrote in post #18828278 (external link)
I'm not sure if you have a Costco in your area but I have had really good results from them. (not astro, but many landscapes and portraits) Their auto correction is ok but you can look up your stores printer profile and finalize your image to their printer for the best results.

Thank you! I will check our local store




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 14, 2019 08:48 |  #7

saea501 wrote in post #18828277 (external link)
Is your monitor calibrated?

If you're sending files that are edited on a monitor that isn't at least semi standardized then the prints will look....not great.

It's more than just having a calibrated monitor. You need to do your final processing with a profile matched to your output device. Printers can be very different than monitors and what looks good on the screen can end up looking not so good on paper.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 14, 2019 08:56 |  #8

KDS1 wrote in post #18828537 (external link)
No, It isn’t. I am visually impaired so everything on my Mac is enlarged for better viewing. Can you offer tips for calibration?

There are a few tutorials out there on how to calibrate your Mac. Google "color calibration mac your monitor" and a few come up. Choose one that fit's your needs. THIS (external link) one looked pretty decent. If you want to get more serious, a device like the Spyder Pro does a fantastic job.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intheswamp
Endeavor to Persevere
1,839 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1285
Joined Sep 2013
Location: South Alabama
     
Mar 14, 2019 09:07 as a reply to  @ KDS1's post |  #9

A calibration tool is needed for proper calibration. Looks like the Spyder5Elite is running around $200. I have the Spyder4Elite and don't recall it costing that much...but my memory isn't as good as it was a hundred years ago. ;-)a

Here is an article discussing non-tool calibration and transitioning to discussing using a calibration tool: How To Calibrate Your Monitor (external link)

One thing I will say is that a print will often be darker than what you see on your screen. I was reminded of this a while back when I had a test print made. Basically the shadows went to black and had no detail. I went back and increased the brightness of the image and had another print made...it was much better...details in the shadows!

I might not be explaining this exactly correct but one problem is that images on a monitor are back lit with the light source emitting towards us....they're "lit up". With a print, only reflective light is seen. So, what looks good on the back-lit monitor ends up being too dark on paper.

FWIW.
Best wishes!
Ed


The poorest of the poor. A country of children taking care of children: https://handsofloveusa​.org/ (external link)
My little weather page: www.beeweather.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
     
Mar 14, 2019 13:30 |  #10

If you want to crowd source a rough and ready solution, just post one or two of the problematic files you sent for printing. Those of us who have or think we have good calibration can make appropriate adjustments and post results for your review.


George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KDS1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 218
Joined Dec 2018
Location: Detroit US
     
Mar 14, 2019 17:09 |  #11

gjl711 wrote in post #18828643 (external link)
There are a few tutorials out there on how to calibrate your Mac. Google "color calibration mac your monitor" and a few come up. Choose one that fit's your needs. THIS (external link) one looked pretty decent. If you want to get more serious, a device like the Spyder Pro does a fantastic job.

Thank you! I'm new to this and I have much to learn so this will help me tremendously.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KDS1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 218
Joined Dec 2018
Location: Detroit US
     
Mar 14, 2019 17:13 |  #12

Intheswamp wrote in post #18828649 (external link)
A calibration tool is needed for proper calibration. Looks like the Spyder5Elite is running around $200. I have the Spyder4Elite and don't recall it costing that much...but my memory isn't as good as it was a hundred years ago. ;-)a

Here is an article discussing non-tool calibration and transitioning to discussing using a calibration tool: How To Calibrate Your Monitor (external link)

One thing I will say is that a print will often be darker than what you see on your screen. I was reminded of this a while back when I had a test print made. Basically the shadows went to black and had no detail. I went back and increased the brightness of the image and had another print made...it was much better...details in the shadows!

I might not be explaining this exactly correct but one problem is that images on a monitor are back lit with the light source emitting towards us....they're "lit up". With a print, only reflective light is seen. So, what looks good on the back-lit monitor ends up being too dark on paper.

FWIW.
Best wishes!
Ed

Thank you Ed, I think some of the problem may be I am printing unedited photos (not enhanced). Nations Photo does "color correction" so I thought that may be sufficient. Wrong. I was explaining to JJ that all of this is new so I'm learning a lot from everyones feedback so I appreciate you taking the time to spell things out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KDS1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 218
Joined Dec 2018
Location: Detroit US
     
Mar 14, 2019 17:14 |  #13

AZGeorge wrote in post #18828749 (external link)
If you want to crowd source a rough and ready solution, just post one or two of the problematic files you sent for printing. Those of us who have or think we have good calibration can make appropriate adjustments and post results for your review.

Thank you
One of the photos is this one...

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/2/LQ_966157.jpg
Photo from KDS1's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (966157)

and this...

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/2/LQ_966151.jpg
Photo from KDS1's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (966151)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,668 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Southen Arizona
     
Mar 14, 2019 22:37 |  #14

If I were to send the sky shot as you see it here to Miller Pro I'd expect to see black sky with distinct points of light and a defuse orange glow when the prints arrived. I removed the upper left vegetation just because I didn't want to work hard enough to get it looking right.

With the water shot I'd expect to see soft pastel blends in the prints and an overall less the bright atmosphere.

If that is not what you are seeking on your monitor then you might want to hazzard either adjusting it in general or setting up a different profile photo adjustments.

I hope others will post their ready for the printer takes so we can both learn more.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/2/LQ_966396.jpg
Image hosted by forum (966396) © AZGeorge [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/03/2/LQ_966397.jpg
Image hosted by forum (966397) © AZGeorge [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,733 views & 3 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Where do you get prints/ Astrophotography and landscape
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1601 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.