Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 27 Mar 2019 (Wednesday) 07:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Olympus M.ZUIKO 60mm f/2.8 Macro Lens and Raynox 250

 
davholla
Goldmember
2,119 posts
Gallery: 461 photos
Likes: 2672
Joined Nov 2014
     
Mar 27, 2019 07:20 |  #1

I am thinking of going to Panasonic and using this combination.
However the thread of the 60mm lens is 46mm so how would I attach it to the Raynox 250?
Has anyone done this? Any advice?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,944 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2495
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Mar 27, 2019 11:22 |  #2

46-52mm step up ring although the 250 doesn’t get you much closer.


Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davholla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,119 posts
Gallery: 461 photos
Likes: 2672
Joined Nov 2014
     
Mar 27, 2019 12:23 |  #3

racketman wrote in post #18835946 (external link)
46-52mm step up ring although the 250 doesn’t get you much closer.

Thanks for that I will have to check the calculations.
I thought that this looked quite close
https://www.flickr.com …6384739235/in/d​ateposted/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 4 years ago by Archibald.
     
Mar 27, 2019 14:25 |  #4

I don't own any Raynox closeup lenses, but have investigated them a bit. The universal clip-on thingy needs to go on lenses with filter sizes from 52mm to 67mm, which is not right for your lens. But the bare Raynox has a thread size of 43mm. That's what I would try. So you would need a step-down adapter, 46-43mm. Better confirm, though, because I have not tried this.

Step-down adapters for Raynox lenses can be very hard to find. (And that is a reason why I don't own any Raynoxes!) Step-down adapters seem to be very cheap things to manufacture. If Raynox would get on the ball and make xx-43mm step-down rings available, they would probably double their sales.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davholla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,119 posts
Gallery: 461 photos
Likes: 2672
Joined Nov 2014
     
Mar 28, 2019 03:44 |  #5

Archibald wrote in post #18836037 (external link)
I don't own any Raynox closeup lenses, but have investigated them a bit. The universal clip-on thingy needs to go on lenses with filter sizes from 52mm to 67mm, which is not right for your lens. But the bare Raynox has a thread size of 43mm. That's what I would try. So you would need a step-down adapter, 46-43mm. Better confirm, though, because I have not tried this.

Step-down adapters for Raynox lenses can be very hard to find. (And that is a reason why I don't own any Raynoxes!) Step-down adapters seem to be very cheap things to manufacture. If Raynox would get on the ball and make xx-43mm step-down rings available, they would probably double their sales.

Thanks for that I found this
https://www.srb-photographic.co.uk …m-step-up-ring-2545-p.asp (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Mar 28, 2019 09:48 |  #6

That is a step-up. You would need a step-down. The first number is always the lens, the second is the filter. OK, by "filter" I mean the bare Raynox. You would need 46-43mm, not 43-46mm


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davholla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,119 posts
Gallery: 461 photos
Likes: 2672
Joined Nov 2014
     
Mar 28, 2019 11:03 |  #7

Archibald wrote in post #18836368 (external link)
That is a step-up. You would need a step-down. The first number is always the lens, the second is the filter. OK, by "filter" I mean the bare Raynox. You would need 46-43mm, not 43-46mm

Thank you so much
It is this that I will need
https://www.srb-photographic.co.uk …step-down-ring-2558-p.asp (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Mar 28, 2019 11:21 |  #8

davholla wrote in post #18836395 (external link)
Thank you so much
It is this that I will need
https://www.srb-photographic.co.uk …step-down-ring-2558-p.asp (external link)

Looks right!


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,944 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2495
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
Post edited over 4 years ago by racketman.
     
Mar 28, 2019 15:40 |  #9

No you do need what I said a 46-52mm step UP ring. I have the lens and the Raynox.

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7912/40522388603_2b50c4f5cd_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/24JP​Qmt  (external link) IMG_0597 Zuiko 60mm _ Raynox 250 (external link) by tobyjug5 (external link), on Flickr

Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 4 years ago by Archibald.
     
Mar 28, 2019 16:04 |  #10

racketman wrote in post #18836530 (external link)
No you do need what I said a 46-52mm step UP ring. I have the lens and the Raynox.
QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/24JP​Qmt  (external link) IMG_0597 Zuiko 60mm _ Raynox 250 (external link) by tobyjug5 (external link), on Flickr

The bare Raynox has a 43 mm thread. So he needs a step-down ring to use the bare Raynox. Not saying your way won't work, but why does he have to do it your way?


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
avondale87
thanks for whoever started this
Avatar
16,658 posts
Gallery: 1473 photos
Likes: 79298
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tasmania
     
Mar 28, 2019 16:15 |  #11

racketman wrote in post #18836530 (external link)
No you do need what I said a 46-52mm step UP ring. I have the lens and the Raynox.

Toby where did you get that adapter please?
It was you that set me on a Raynox path years ago with my G12.
I now have EM5 2 and would like a proper setup for that.
Also have the 60mm macro.



Richard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Mar 28, 2019 16:36 |  #12

For those who don't know how to use a bare Raynox with a step-down ring, here is a link.
http://photography.des​ignmotion.net …esting-the-raynox-dcr-250 (external link)


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
avondale87
thanks for whoever started this
Avatar
16,658 posts
Gallery: 1473 photos
Likes: 79298
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tasmania
     
Mar 28, 2019 21:26 |  #13

Is there confusion between up to and down from here?
Depends what's the reference.
Wonder whether this is why difference in expressed views?
Plus the bare Raynox versus the adaptor.



Richard

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,511 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51020
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 4 years ago by Archibald.
     
Mar 28, 2019 22:02 |  #14

avondale87 wrote in post #18836706 (external link)
Is there confusion between up to and down from here?
Depends what's the reference.
Wonder whether this is why difference in expressed views?
Plus the bare Raynox versus the adaptor.

Yes.

You can attach the Raynox in two ways:


  1. Using the proprietary Raynox snap-on adapter, and
  2. Using the bare Raynox and a step-down ring.

In the first alternative, the bare Raynox is installed into the snap-on adapter, and the snap-on adapter with the Raynox is fitted over the end of the lens. The Zuiko lens is too small for the adapter, so a step-up ring is needed to fill the gap.

In the second alternative, the bare Raynox is screwed into the filter thread of the Zuiko lens with the aid of a step-down ring.

Racketman declares that you need what he said, and that is alternative 1. In the link I provided, Peter Bartlett, a professional photographer and blogger, says alternative 2 is better. The method I was describing earlier with davholla was method 2.

The salient info is out now, the decision is up to you guys!

I don't have a dog in this fight, I have neither the Zuiko lens nor the Raynox! :-D (For now.)

Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to Focus on Photography (https://focusonphotogr​aphy.community.forum/ (external link)) where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,944 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2495
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
Post edited over 4 years ago by racketman. (5 edits in all)
     
Mar 29, 2019 10:20 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #15

Okay hands up, I hadn’t heard of anyone attaching the Raynox that way but if it’s secure then why not.
Only advantage of using the Raynox adapter might be quick release.
Either way it’s a bit of a waste of time in my opinion as the increase in magnification is not that great ( fill frame with 1.2cm width versus 1.8mm with bare lens).
If you’re after subjects as small as Springtails the MSN-202 x4 Raynox might be a better bet ( fill frame with 6mm max 1.2cm min) although working distance becomes rather short at max mag. You could use a 46-37mm step down ring to mount it ߘ


Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,497 views & 18 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Olympus M.ZUIKO 60mm f/2.8 Macro Lens and Raynox 250
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1088 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.