Olympus M.ZUIKO 60mm f/2.8 Macro Lens and Raynox 250

These don't reflect what can be achieved with the 60mm.
Are they using focus stacking?
I have played with that on my EM5 but have mixed results and yet I know it can deliver.

avondale87 wrote in post #18842198
These don't reflect what can be achieved with the 60mm.
Are they using focus stacking?
I have played with that on my EM5 but have mixed results and yet I know it can deliver.

Yes I think that better could be achieved, I was using focus stacking

Might be worth contacting Achim Kluck for some tips?


https://www.flickr.com …p7h-FRsU7H-JjFpGu-FZarKw/

I did but he has not replied yet

I didn't have much time tonight and I realized that my mobile phone light is not a good source. I am beginning to think that this is not the best buy ever, I will try a bit more and see if I should keep them or not. First one with Canon second with Panasonic - not a real benefit even if you ignore the light.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RJaS​dv

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2e6F​T6B

davholla wrote in post #18843564
I didn't have much time tonight and I realized that my mobile phone light is not a good source. I am beginning to think that this is not the best buy ever, I will try a bit more and see if I should keep them or not. First one with Canon second with Panasonic - not a real benefit even if you ignore the light.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/RJaS​dv CanonTry. by davholla2002, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2e6F​T6B panasonictry1-1 by davholla2002, on Flickr

I don't have much of a clue what you did here.

The light looks much softer in the second. You could fix the white balance in the second, couldn't you?