cfgndhfkgjkf
NullMember Goldmember 3,019 posts Likes: 1130 Joined Nov 2009 More info Post edited over 2 years ago by NullMember. | Apr 08, 2019 13:58 | #1 Permanentlycfgndhfkgjkf
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Apr 08, 2019 14:24 | #2 It could be the aperture blades, or some electrical connection, or... who knows, but unless you are really handy and don't mind disassembling and reassembling a lens, Canon service is probably the best way to go. You covered the easy things and the next steps are most likely inside the lens. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do." 17,636 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8386 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | Apr 08, 2019 18:09 | #3 . notastockpikr wrote in post #18842605 . Try cleaning the contacts on the lens. This is usually the first thing to try before sending the lens in for service. . . john crossley wrote in post #18842442 I have a Canon 24-70 f2.8L lens and the aperture will not close. Shooting at f2.8 the lens works perfectly, but as soon as I try to use a smaller aperture I get an error message (Err 01 Communications between the camera and lens is faulty. Clean the lens contacts.) Cleaning the contacts makes no difference and using the lens on a different body has the same result. So I can only conclude that there is a problem with the aperture blades. . "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,258 posts Likes: 1527 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Apr 08, 2019 19:04 | #4 A relatively common cause of this behavior is a failure of the ribbon cable. A few years back it was reported to be about a $200 repair by Canon. If you feel adventurous, you can find some online step by step procedures for disassembly and you can get a ribbon cable on eBay for about $30.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd" More info | Apr 09, 2019 04:46 | #5 If they're just stuck, you could always try poking the depth-of-field button a bit to try & unstick them, otherwise I suspect you're looking at a Canon repair... some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,258 posts Likes: 1527 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info Post edited over 4 years ago by John from PA. (3 edits in all) | Apr 09, 2019 05:57 | #6 john crossley wrote in post #18842789 Thanks for the replies. As I said previously I think it is the actual aperture blades that are damaged as the lens works as it should when shooting at f2.8. Because it only works at f/2.8 is a symptom of the ribbon cable problem, not something that rules it out. See the thread at https://community.usa.canon.com …problem-again/td-p/247031
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do." 17,636 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8386 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info | Apr 09, 2019 07:50 | #7 John from PA wrote in post #18842879 Because it only works at f/2.8 is a symptom of the ribbon cable problem not something that rules it out. . "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Apr 09, 2019 08:10 | #8 I would think that if it's working at f/2.8, then the PCBs and pins are functioning as the lens is reporting back to the body that it's at f/2.8, thus, no ERR01. I'm still guessing ribbon cable or motor. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iroctd Senior Member 343 posts Likes: 66 Joined Aug 2013 Location: East coast More info | Apr 09, 2019 08:19 | #9 john crossley wrote in post #18842789 Thanks for the replies. As I said previously I think it is the actual aperture blades that are damaged as the lens works as it should when shooting at f2.8. As for repairing the lens myself, I am very confident in stripping the lens down, it's putting it back together that's the hard bit. Getting to the aperture assembly will require complete disassembly.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
artyH Goldmember 2,118 posts Likes: 32 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Apr 09, 2019 09:11 | #10 I had the iris replaced by Canon in my old 35F2. I wouldn’t try this myself with a very expensive lens. The cost was $109 plus shipping and worth it. I have no idea what the cost would be for the 24-70, but Canon can provide an estimate.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,258 posts Likes: 1527 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Apr 09, 2019 09:12 | #11 gjl711 wrote in post #18842926 I would think that if it's working at f/2.8, then the PCBs and pins are functioning as the lens is reporting back to the body that it's at f/2.8, thus, no ERR01. I'm still guessing ribbon cable or motor. But the OP reports an error... john crossley wrote in post #18842442 I have a Canon 24-70 f2.8L lens and the aperture will not close. Shooting at f2.8 the lens works perfectly, but as soon as I try to use a smaller aperture I get an error message (Err 01 Communications between the camera and lens is faulty. C
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,258 posts Likes: 1527 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info Post edited over 4 years ago by John from PA. | Apr 09, 2019 09:21 | #12 Worthwhile thread, comments especially, at http://marcschultz.com …e-death-of-the-diaphragm/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Apr 09, 2019 09:22 | #13 John from PA wrote in post #18842963 But the OP reports an error... At any aperture past f/2.8. Shooting at 2.8 works fine. That's why I think that the electronics are working and the pins are connected. It's past f/2.8 that causes errors. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
buzzyrabbit Senior Member More info Post edited over 4 years ago by buzzyrabbit. | May 08, 2019 10:26 | #14 Same problem on my 24-105L mk 1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
notastockpikr Senior Member 440 posts Likes: 73 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Canada More info | ....ooops, not enough coffee that day.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1521 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||