Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 28 Apr 2019 (Sunday) 07:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CANON EOS 1D MARK IV Owners

 
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jul 11, 2019 09:46 |  #31

N.V.M. wrote in post #18891814 (external link)
i too own the 7D2 and 1D4. for me, the deal breaker between the two cameras is the loud shutter of the 1D4. (yes, i primarily shoot wildlife).

Yeah, I hear you on that (pun intended).

I use the 1D4 as my main wildlife body, and am constantly putting it on the so-called "silent" mode, which is quieter but not even close to silent. . The thing that sucks about that is that in silent mode I lose the 10 FPS burst rate, which is extremely important for a lot of the work I do.

Loud shutters suck. . Totally suck. . Heck, even the very quiet "simulated shutter noise" on my cell phone scared a lizard away last week .... freaked him out and he ran off. . ANY noise AT ALL can scare an animal away, even if it is an extremely soft noise.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Jul 11, 2019 09:46 as a reply to  @ post 18891861 |  #32

You can find new 1D series bodies for well under $6K. The street price is around $4700 from authorized dealers, one has to do their due diligence and not just go out and be willing to pay full list asking prices.

That was the intent of my post.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 11, 2019 09:52 as a reply to  @ Tom Reichner's post |  #33

For lizards, it is the frequencies being generated most likely, more so than the volume of the sound you are hearing. They have a range of 400 to 1500 Hz, which is quite low. As an example, those test tones you hear on the radio or TV are in this basic range (probably around 1000 Hz), or that wha-wha-wha sound of Charlie Brown's teacher.

I suspect that even with a quieter shutter (to our ears), the frequency may still be enough to scare some animals. :( Eventually sensor tech (Sony has some things in the pipeline I believe) will be good enough to allow for fully operational global shutters that don't create the rolling effect, etc.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:10 |  #34

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18891870 (external link)
For lizards, it is the frequencies being generated most likely, more so than the volume of the sound you are hearing. They have a range of 400 to 1500 Hz, which is quite low. As an example, those test tones you hear on the radio or TV are in this basic range (probably around 1000 Hz), or that wha-wha-wha sound of Charlie Brown's teacher.

I suspect that even with a quieter shutter (to our ears), the frequency may still be enough to scare some animals. :( Eventually sensor tech (Sony has some things in the pipeline I believe) will be good enough to allow for fully operational global shutters that don't create the rolling effect, etc.

.
In my case, I had gotten this lizard used to me and had photographed him for about an hour and a half with my 1D4. . I got him real used to me and over the hour and a half moved closer and closer until I was about three feet away from him (near MFD with my 100-400 v2). . I felt that I could get much closer to him, but my 100-400 doesn't focus any closer than 2 or 3 feet, so I pulled out my cell phone and slowly, steadily, extended it towards him until it was only a few inches away from him. . Then, when I pressed the "shutter", it made this tiny little faint sound, and he bolted! . Gone!

I think the fact that the sound came from only a couple inches away is what spooked him. I think this because when I was using my 1D4, I was 2 or 3 feet from him, and didn't have it on silent mode, and he was totally fine with the loud clunk.

So I think it was the insanely close proximity of the sound that scared him, but I don't know that for sure, and you may be right on the money with your "frequency" idea.

By the way, Cary, this happened just last week, not too far from you .... in Oklahoma, which I think is less than a thousand miles from your place, right?


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 1182 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 13282
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:16 |  #35

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18891870 (external link)
For lizards, it is the frequencies being generated most likely, more so than the volume of the sound you are hearing. They have a range of 400 to 1500 Hz, which is quite low. As an example, those test tones you hear on the radio or TV are in this basic range (probably around 1000 Hz), or that wha-wha-wha sound of Charlie Brown's teacher.

Yep, you learn something new every day. Just not sure what I'm going to do with this information. LOL. Been here for 10 years and you guys have taught me a bunch and I mean it sincerely but if it's OK I'm going to delete the lizard stuff.


R6~ ef100-400 II L~ Canon 1.4 extender III~ Canon 100mm 2.8 L Makro~Tamron 24-70 2.8 G2~ Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2~ Tamron 85mm 1.8~IRIX 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:17 |  #36

Yes that is with 1k miles. On our vacation, I was taking some lizard shots at a resort where they're use to humans, and I could not get within a yard of them without watching then scurry into the brush. :(

I ended up having to go with as long reach lens.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:18 as a reply to  @ 2cruise's post |  #37

I thought about pulling up my tone generator app to see what scared off some of the wildlife during our vacation. :)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:23 |  #38

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18891866 (external link)
You can find new 1D series bodies for well under $6K. The street price is around $4700 from authorized dealers, one has to do their due diligence and not just go out and be willing to pay full list asking prices.

That was the intent of my post.

.
He got it two or three years ago when it was first released (which to me is still "recent") .... I'm not sure you could get a new one from an authorized dealer for $4700 at that time.

But about the intent of your post - you are right in that if today someone paid $5,000 or $6,000, then they would have overpaid a bit for it. . But some people really don't care about a few hundred dollars and wouldn't bother to shop around if that's all they're going to save.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:24 |  #39

2cruise wrote in post #18891880 (external link)
Yep, you learn something new every day. Just not sure what I'm going to do with this information. LOL. Been here for 10 years and you guys have taught me a bunch and I mean it sincerely but if it's OK I'm going to delete the lizard stuff.

.
Delete? . What do you mean by that?


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 1182 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 13282
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:26 |  #40

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18891888 (external link)
.
Delete? . What do you mean by that?

.

From my memory as I have very limited space:lol:


R6~ ef100-400 II L~ Canon 1.4 extender III~ Canon 100mm 2.8 L Makro~Tamron 24-70 2.8 G2~ Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2~ Tamron 85mm 1.8~IRIX 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 11, 2019 10:50 as a reply to  @ Tom Reichner's post |  #41

My reply on 6k being a scam price was made to another talking about current and future purchases. :)

A 300 to 1300 savings is quite a bit for me and I am blessed to have good income. I understand if that isn't the same threshold for others.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_igi
Senior Member
Avatar
267 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2011
Location: Warsaw, Poland
     
Jul 14, 2019 14:42 |  #42

1DIV and 1DSIII are the best cameras for the buck in Canon system, i just can't believe how easy it is to grab magnificient photographs with these. I've used more modern cameras before (5D2, 6D, 5D3), but images i get from the 1D's are simply awesome.


5DIV | 1DsIII x2 | 1DIV | TS-E17/4L | TS-E 24/3.5LII | 24L | 35L | 50L | 100L | 135L | 24-105L | 28-70/2.8L | 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2cruise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 1182 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 13282
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Virginia.....I'm also known as Whisle
     
Sep 29, 2019 07:17 |  #43

_igi wrote in post #18893579 (external link)
1DIV and 1DSIII are the best cameras for the buck in Canon system, i just can't believe how easy it is to grab magnificient photographs with these. I've used more modern cameras before (5D2, 6D, 5D3), but images i get from the 1D's are simply awesome.

I agree

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48796259487_bf44b4c8dc_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2hkX​zUK  (external link) Thunderbirds (external link) by Whisle (Clyde Cornett) (external link)

R6~ ef100-400 II L~ Canon 1.4 extender III~ Canon 100mm 2.8 L Makro~Tamron 24-70 2.8 G2~ Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2~ Tamron 85mm 1.8~IRIX 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone~Lee filters
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,342 views & 42 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
CANON EOS 1D MARK IV Owners
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1597 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.