Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 23 Mar 2006 (Thursday) 15:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What is this stuff?

 
mknabster
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Limerick, PA, USA
     
Mar 23, 2006 15:25 |  #1

Ok, i was using the monochrome w/ the Channel Mixer layer in CS2, and i'm starting to notice this more, there seems to be some sort of noise in the picture, or at least that's what i think it is. I tried using my noise reduction software, but it wouldn't go away. Do you see it in this picture? Is there a way i can get rid of it?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


- Matt

MK Studios (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Mar 23, 2006 15:42 |  #2

"Noise"? Did you say "Noise"?

You have chosen well.

You get a dramatically increased level of noise if you emphasize the red (as you did here) or the blue channels.

The reason for this the the Bayer Pattern of the sensor. Look at the pattern below. If you notice, 50% of the pixels are green, 25% are blue and 25% are red. So the blues and reds end up being peppered in the shot which contains the lions share of green information. By selecting either the blue or red, you are effectively discarding 75% of the information of the shot, including 75% of the luma information. As a result you get a much more pixelated look.

The method I have chosen to deal with that problem is called "Getting a 5D", which has a lot more pixels - with less weight given to each one.

Though I have not tried it, I would suppose that using an edge mask and a Gaussian blur on only the red channel should help.

Rad


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 23, 2006 22:42 |  #3

With all due reverence to Rad's comments - I'm sure that he is 1000% correct in all that he said - I am personally having trouble gleaning any meaningful information out of the picture for some fairly simple reasons.

First, it's only 800 x 574 pixels, which is not a lot of resolution, and secondly, it has suffered extreme compression at the hands of Mr. JPG. So, when I look at the image at 300% in Photoshop, the pixels dominate everything. I also see what I would call posterization or mottled clumps of sameness (usually, that's due to the compression).

If it's no great trouble for you and if you want another opinion, try posting a 2"x2" full detail, 100% crop from the original color file and the same thing from the grayscale file. That would allow anyone to see the original information and also see the result of your processing.

If you choose to do that and are not sure of how to do it, instructions for doing a full detail 100% crop are at frame 37 in this thread:
https://photography-on-the.net …thread.php?t=34​606&page=3

You never can tell what we might turn up!


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

852 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
What is this stuff?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1585 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.