OhLook wrote in post #18896387
I see about as much black in the grassy area as green, and the histogram shows an excess of data missing at the left end. I guess that leaves your extreme sensitivity to account for most of the prominence of green in your view. Or perhaps I'm unusually
insensitive when it comes to discriminating tones.
.
It looks about the same in your screenshot as it does on mine.
To my eye, and to my aesthetic tastes, having any of that green at all in the image looks completely out of place, because it is incongruous with the color palette of the rest of the image. . How much, or how little, is immaterial ...... its presence, in any amount, is a problem to my eye. . But even the part of the grass that is rendered as black is incongruous, because such a dark tonal value creates an imbalance that works against the appeal of the image.
I mean, if you were an artist, and mixing colors for a painting - colors that you think work especially well together - would you ever use any of that green in this piece? . When everything else has a nice, muted pastel look to it, just one little patch of that overbold green is too much.
It really is a lovely color palette, with the exception of the the areas of grass (both black and green).
.
"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".