Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 14 Jul 2019 (Sunday) 21:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Time to improve.....

 
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8356
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jul 16, 2019 21:25 |  #16

.

308Shooter wrote in post #18894490 (external link)
.... water generally falls straight down.

.
Not as often as one might assume.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,822 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16158
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jul 16, 2019 23:20 |  #17

In the mill scene, I'd trust the water to be vertical sooner than I'd trust the old building, which may have settled. Falling water can be displaced by wind, but then it should look fluffy/wispy or curved. The drip in question seems quite calm.

Of course, a lens and a high or low point of view can distort angles and throw off judgments.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,943 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9232
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Jul 17, 2019 19:34 |  #18

Great stuff, sir, you already know I like 'em. But I am also going through this trial by fire critique process, and what better thing to do than lash out at some innocent member in response. So here're my comments, worth the price you paid for 'em.

1) I think you missed an opportunity to wrap the framing in the lower left corner. A little more rock there would help the comp. The blue sky was hard to control; I had the same problem. I think the greens on the bottom right are fine, one way or the other. I think the lighting is rather flat in this image; lack of contrast.

2) I didn't like that big boner rock right in the middle of things. Sure, it's natural, and the rocks along the bottom are great framing, but I probably would have stepped in front of it and put water in the foreground. The waterfall treatment looks beautiful here, and the lighting has a depth that is not present in the first image. The greens are beautiful, although you could have also nudged the reds up a little more. This perspective is my favorite of the grist mill. Technically, a very well done image IMO, nicely balanced with space to breathe.

3) Ok, I just don't like the image because the rope is in the wrong location and creates a second horizon. You could have gone high with it, or low with it, but as it is, the line of the rope walking into the horizon and being too close to the docks, plus sitting on the grass, just does not work in my eye. If you were after a barrier effect, there is actually not enough rope in the image. But I think it is an extremely challenging image to shoot. I tried a similar effect in a prison yard photograph and ditched 5 of 6 photos. The B&W conversion is quite nice with just the right amount of contrast. DOF is spot-on. I would take this same image without the rope, keep it OOF, add grain, and love it.

Overall, I like your work with the two wider view images. Processing is just right. On #3 if you're going to go artistic, go 101% and let the crazy out because this feels like a half measure. Cheers!


X100T XT3
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
308Shooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,291 posts
Gallery: 148 photos
Likes: 3682
Joined Dec 2016
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Jul 17, 2019 20:45 |  #19

GlimmerMan wrote in post #18895529 (external link)
Great stuff, sir, you already know I like 'em. But I am also going through this trial by fire critique process, and what better thing to do than lash out at some innocent member in response. So here're my comments, worth the price you paid for 'em.

1) I think you missed an opportunity to wrap the framing in the lower left corner. A little more rock there would help the comp. The blue sky was hard to control; I had the same problem. I think the greens on the bottom right are fine, one way or the other. I think the lighting is rather flat in this image; lack of contrast.

2) I didn't like that big boner rock right in the middle of things. Sure, it's natural, and the rocks along the bottom are great framing, but I probably would have stepped in front of it and put water in the foreground. The waterfall treatment looks beautiful here, and the lighting has a depth that is not present in the first image. The greens are beautiful, although you could have also nudged the reds up a little more. This perspective is my favorite of the grist mill. Technically, a very well done image IMO, nicely balanced with space to breathe.

3) Ok, I just don't like the image because the rope is in the wrong location and creates a second horizon. You could have gone high with it, or low with it, but as it is, the line of the rope walking into the horizon and being too close to the docks, plus sitting on the grass, just does not work in my eye. If you were after a barrier effect, there is actually not enough rope in the image. But I think it is an extremely challenging image to shoot. I tried a similar effect in a prison yard photograph and ditched 5 of 6 photos. The B&W conversion is quite nice with just the right amount of contrast. DOF is spot-on. I would take this same image without the rope, keep it OOF, add grain, and love it.

Overall, I like your work with the two wider view images. Processing is just right. On #3 if you're going to go artistic, go 101% and let the crazy out because this feels like a half measure. Cheers!

Glimmer.... Lashing out - - Now that's funny.
1.) I'm not sure about the framing... to be honest, I can't remember but I think it merged into the hill side further to the left, but not really sure. I just wanted a tighter shot. In regards to the lighting be flat... I don't see that, but I agree I don't like the lighting in this shot as well. It was high noon'ish and the sun was causing some crazy shadows on the building. It was a tough shoot..

2) Hilarious comment on the rock - sort of thought the same thing. Stepping in front of it put me closer than I wanted to be for what I was looking for. In regards to the lighting being better, it was same time of day, but this shot I had some brief clouds come over head, which is what I was looking for. The forecast was supposed to be cloudy. - Lousy forecasters!!!!

3) Not sure what to say on this one.... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. This is my absolute favorite and exactly what I was trying to achieve in the shot. I could try to be all artsy and give a deep meaningful reason why I like it, but fact is.... I just do. It checks all the boxes for me and printed out magnificently.. But, I do appreciate your thoughts. It would have been pretty sweet had we been there are the same time and then each posted on here at same time as well...


Thanks for the feedback - we all need it to learn..

Jamey


Happy Shooting - Jamey

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,265 views & 10 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Time to improve.....
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1345 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.