Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 15 Jul 2019 (Monday) 20:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can't get flash exposure low enough

 
KatManDEW
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Jul 15, 2019 20:38 |  #1

I have a hard time getting my flash power low enough when I shoot in the shade or after dark. Could this because I'm always using wide aperture, between f/1.2 and f/2.8? I'm doing that to get as much bokeh as possible, but also after dark so I can pickup some background (including background lights), while keeping shutter speed high enough. Like1/60th to 1/100 for people standing still or posed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
Post edited over 4 years ago by gonzogolf.
     
Jul 15, 2019 21:11 |  #2

What iso are you using? The flash will feeeze motion so you should adjust your shutter speed as needed to control the background exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 4 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 16, 2019 01:19 |  #3

You don't mention which flash unit you use, so I have to give a generic answer, and assume you have a Canon 580EX (and shooting at ISO 100) ...


  1. At full power the Canon 580EX has a 'normal lens' (32mm on APS-C or 50mm on FF) Guide Number of about 135.
  2. If the Canon 580EX had 1/16 power as its minimum, that is GN of about 33
  3. At GN33 and f/2, you would be overexposed if closer than 16-17'

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soeren
"only intermitent functional"
942 posts
Likes: 571
Joined Nov 2017
     
Jul 16, 2019 02:23 |  #4

From 2m my TT685 gives a reading of F/2 at minimal power. A ND filter wouldn't disturb much if wider aperture or a closer distance is needed but getting the flash off camera + using an appropriate modifier is a better solution. I honestly have difficulty seeing the problem.


If history has proven anything. it's that evolution always wins!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 16, 2019 03:07 |  #5

I suspect some flaw in your approach. But regardless there is always the option of adding diffusion to the front of the flash. A mostly useless diffuser like a omnisphere would cut the power by a stop.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpe
Senior Member
283 posts
Likes: 118
Joined Jan 2017
Location: Wareham
     
Jul 16, 2019 05:17 |  #6

have you tried the flash in TTL with exposure compensation, many flashes will fire at a lower power in TTL than they will when set manually

Mike


UK based photographer specialising in equestrian but also doing things like Prom Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lotto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,750 posts
Likes: 192
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 16, 2019 05:21 |  #7

If you just want to shoot with the prime lens wild open, use a flash/strobe with HSS. Increasing the shutter speed will lower the flash output 4-5 stops below the minimum at standard sync.

If the strobes are too strong in the shade, use a speedlight.

To balance the night scene with strobes, I would pump up the ISO, and use the modeling lamp as the main light.

Samples below are shot with the same 600ws strobe, one with HSS, the other with modeling light only, both at F1.4.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/07/3/LQ_988539.jpg
Image hosted by forum (988539) © Lotto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/07/3/LQ_988540.jpg
Image hosted by forum (988540) © Lotto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 4 years ago by Wilt. (7 edits in all)
     
Jul 16, 2019 09:30 |  #8

gonzogolf wrote in post #18894418 (external link)
I suspect some flaw in your approach. But regardless there is always the option of adding diffusion to the front of the flash. A mostly useless diffuser like a omnisphere would cut the power by a stop.

^^^

Shooting in eTTL mode, even a rather powerful flash like the Canon 580EXn can reduce its power to 1/256 power which is -8EV lower than max power...so while that that has GN135 (or so) at full power, it has GN8 which permits an f/2 lens to shoot as close as 4'.

But we still do not know what flash the OP is using.

Lotto wrote:
If you just want to shoot with the prime lens wild open, use a flash/strobe with HSS. Increasing the shutter speed will lower the flash output 4-5 stops below the minimum at standard sync.

And with the flash in HSS mode, with the camera shutter set to 1/3EV faster than X-sync speed, it loses another -2EV and gets to GN4 which allows f/2 to get to 2'. Yet use of HSS is counter to the OP desire to 'shoot after dark...and pick up some background'.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jul 16, 2019 10:21 |  #9

.

gonzogolf wrote in post #18894418 (external link)
But regardless there is always the option of adding diffusion to the front of the flash. A mostly useless diffuser like a omnisphere would cut the power by a stop.

.
Does the OP really need to use a diffuser to get less light from the flash? . Couldn't he just set the power of the flash to fire at 1/2 power, 1/4 power, 1/8 power ..... all the way down to 1/128th power? . That seems more straightforward to me than sticking something in front of the flash to physically block the light.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jul 16, 2019 10:41 |  #10

I'm guessing that the OP has already reduced the power to the flashes minimum and it's still too much. Without knowing what flash the OP is using and what mode they are shooting in, and weather it supports TTL/ETTL or is a full manual flash, it's hard to offer meaningful suggestions.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Jul 16, 2019 11:51 |  #11

In the old days of 35mm one layer of a white handkerchief over the flash head effectively reduced the light by about 1-stop and also provided some diffusion of the light. Multiple layers didn't work well as I recall, but worth the experiment since you can immediately see the image.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KatManDEW
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Jul 16, 2019 15:40 |  #12

Thanks to everyone for the replies. My sincere apologies for not mentioning the flash I'm using. It's the ORLIT RoveLight RT 610 HSS TTL for Canon. External and internal diffusers in a softbox, and also a diffuser dish inside the softbox.

I shoot manual exposure with the camera and usually manual flash power. 1/128 power has often been too much. I have been able to lower the flash power with TTL instead of manual flash, but even that is too much sometimes.

I'm usually at ISO 200-400, but sometimes 800 or even higher to pickup background lighting on buildings or whatever. I never tried slow shutter and letting the flash freeze the subject. And I never thought of using a shutter speed above sync speed to get reduced power from using HSS. I need to experiment with both of those. I've been using slower shutter speeds to pickup ambient light without raising ISO too high.

Recently I've been trying a Rotolight Anova Pro 2 at night, which of course allows much lower light output.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 16, 2019 15:47 |  #13

...add a Neutral Density filter. Over the flash, reduces the flash. Over then lens makes it harder to see subject/focus


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 4 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Jul 16, 2019 15:48 |  #14

Increase the strobe distance to the subject and/or use a larger modifier.

You can also buy neutral density gel sheets for the flash, but assuming the flash has been set up close to the subject in the past, a little distance can make a big difference.

Feathering the modifier will also help.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 4 years ago by Wilt.
     
Jul 16, 2019 16:00 |  #15

ORLIT RoveLight RT 610 is even more powerful and has an ISO 100 GN221, which is a fundamental issue when really low power is needed. The manual range of power is from setting 1 - 9, so you get 1/256 power from it. The lowest Guide Number is about GN14 at ISO 100, but it is GN19 at your preferred ISO 200. At f/2 you have to be at 9.5' away at your preferred ISO, and 16' away at your preferred f/1.2


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,387 views & 2 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
Can't get flash exposure low enough
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1431 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.