Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
Thread started 18 Jul 2019 (Thursday) 11:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How Prime Day went wrong

 
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jul 20, 2019 13:47 |  #16

I doubt there are pricing errors. Just like these errors never happen on large items that require freight, etc. It is a business tactic. And it works. They're not losing money at all, instead, they're making more.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rstanford
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jul 20, 2019 22:13 as a reply to  @ post 18896891 |  #17

Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, amazon does not sell the canon $13000 800mm Adorama does, they ship and sell the lens that amazon advertises, they would not honor the price that the people are claiming in the article




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonuser123
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 2080
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Southern California
Post edited over 4 years ago by Canonuser123.
     
Jul 20, 2019 23:00 as a reply to  @ Rstanford's post |  #18

Whatever helps you sleep at night. Example of someone bragging about their haul due to a price glitch. https://www.reddit.com …rom_the_prime_d​ay_glitch/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5909
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Jul 21, 2019 01:24 as a reply to  @ Rstanford's post |  #19

$13k Sony 600mm f4 is what they are talking about, from what I’ve read.


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bildeb0rg
Goldmember
Avatar
3,871 posts
Gallery: 817 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 4987
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Perthshire in Scotland
     
Jul 21, 2019 04:51 |  #20

None of this is verifiable and I don't understand how/why you are all getting your panties in a wad. We've all encountered someone that has had a better deal than the next guy (ask the guy on the next sun lounger how much he paid for his holiday), if you've been to Tenerife, someone's been to Elevenerife etc. Example, hey guys I just walked in to a Ferrari dealership and got a car for a buck 95! I'd post a pic but I don't have my cell on me. If you still think she got five EF 800s at that price, I have some magic beans...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonuser123
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 2080
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 21, 2019 08:33 as a reply to  @ bildeb0rg's post |  #21

Did you even click on the link I posted? They have a picture of their 16 thousand dollar haul, read the comments. I can’t believe how badly society has devolved where people will shamelessly brag about ripping off a company. People might have been fired over this.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rstanford
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jul 21, 2019 19:49 as a reply to  @ Canonuser123's post |  #22

Yes, and there isn’t a 800mm, they bought camera kits, which were probably $94.48, but they did not post a screenshot of what they were charged.

You can’t automatically believe everything you read.

Most of the original article is made up, it’s not true.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonuser123
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 2080
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 21, 2019 20:08 |  #23

Rstanford wrote in post #18897670 (external link)
Yes, and there isn’t a 800mm, they bought camera kits, which were probably $94.48, but they did not post a screenshot of what they were charged.

You can’t automatically believe everything you read.

Most of the original article is made up, it’s not true.

I never once mentioned an 800mm lens and there are lots of people on the internet bragging about ripping off Amazon, some are showing screenshots of what they paid. There is even a screenshot in the comments from one person in the link I posted.

What I believe is a lot of people have no shame.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rstanford
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jul 21, 2019 21:34 as a reply to  @ Canonuser123's post |  #24

That’s what the original post was about




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,515 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6391
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2019 21:39 |  #25

Canonuser123 wrote in post #18897682 (external link)
I never once mentioned an 800mm lens and there are lots of people on the internet bragging about ripping off Amazon, some are showing screenshots of what they paid. There is even a screenshot in the comments from one person in the link I posted.

What I believe is a lot of people have no shame.

I think you're right.
Well, I ended up with some shame after losing my cool trying to negotiate returning a Mac Book Pro BnH sent me by mistake.
Keeping the MacBook, for which I paid $100, was not something I had to ponder though.
https://photography-on-the.net …read.php?t=1504​509&page=6


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canonuser123
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 2080
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Southern California
     
Jul 21, 2019 23:57 as a reply to  @ Choderboy's post |  #26

That was quite the ordeal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,515 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6391
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 22, 2019 01:50 as a reply to  @ Canonuser123's post |  #27

I think both parties contributed to making an ordeal out of something that should have been sorted fast with little fuss.
It did make me think that they did not have much experience handling honesty.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
moose10101
registered smartass
1,778 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 334
Joined May 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jul 22, 2019 11:41 |  #28

Rstanford wrote in post #18897670 (external link)
Most of the original article is made up, it’s not true.

What do you base that on? First-hand knowledge?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
avigar
Senior Member
Avatar
312 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Northern IL
Post edited over 4 years ago by avigar. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 25, 2019 23:38 as a reply to  @ moose10101's post |  #29

The photography related items that sold for under $100, whether whole kits, bodies only, or lenses, were only sold and shipped by Amazon. This all happened with the first opening minutes of the Prime Day event at 12am Pacific Time. Third party vendors, selling the same exact items, were not affected by the pricing glitch. It all happened very quickly. Within minutes after it was discovered, Amazon only prices for the same items, suddenly went back to normal. I did witness it, first-hand. The reduced prices, from what I've read, were only seen by actual Prime members only. Non-Prime members never saw the reduced prices.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jay25
Member
214 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 248
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Loganville Georgia
     
Aug 04, 2019 07:21 |  #30

What did Amazon lose? Nothing Jeff makes billions he will need write offs. What better way to do it then to reward his own customers for it! To,those that don't follow stocks one amazon share is over $1800 now. Was $2000 a couple days ago. Enjoy your low price items




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,541 views & 26 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 9 members.
How Prime Day went wrong
FORUMS Marketplace & Market Info Market Watch 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1280 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.