TeeJay Goldmember  3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:15 | #1 I've borrowed a couple of lenses and taken these almost identical pics, in natural light, 100% crop, no PP.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Livinthalife Cream of the Crop  5,118 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Austin,TX More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:18 | #2 im guessing the second one is the better one. what 2 lens did u use? -Andy-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeJay THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:20 | #3 I'll reveal that when I've had a few more answers, thanks very much for you input. 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ikinaa Goldmember  1,517 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2003 Location: Luxembourg More info | If you have taken both with the same focal length, then the second has a larger aperture than the first because the DOF is smaller.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jman13 Cream of the Crop  5,567 posts Likes: 164 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:27 | #5 I too feel the second one is probably the better picture. The tablecloth is a bit sharper, the bokeh looks a bit better to me (though not by much), and there's more contrast. Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chell Senior Member 325 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: wrexham, north wales More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:28 | #6 Yep, I too think the second one looks sharper. 2x 20D's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbze430 Goldmember  2,454 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Chino Hills More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:34 | #7 I say the first one is better with better color contrast than the 2nd one. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roli_bark Senior Member  918 posts Joined Oct 2005 More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:42 | #8 The 2nd has better Bokeh, but the 1st has better contrast.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irv Member 39 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: North Yorkshire, UK More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:45 | #9 the exif is intact, 1st is at f5 and 2nd pic is at f/4. i like the first shot better, the 2nd looks ever so slightly cooler so i'm going to guess #2 is an L lens Canon EOS 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeJay THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:47 | #10 Sorry to keep to you hanging on, but I'll wait for a few more comments. Thanks all for taking the time. 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digibeet Member  132 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Groningen, Nederland More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:54 | #11 I prefer the fist one, just a little crispier.. eos M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOSAddict Book Committee Immortal  6,091 posts Likes: 17 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Preston, Lancashire, England More info | Mar 24, 2006 04:56 | #12 Very difficult to tell Al
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cmpowell125 Senior Member  869 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2006 Location: London, UK More info | Mar 24, 2006 05:11 | #13 I think number one looks better. A little more detail Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BradS Member  91 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Akron, OH More info | Mar 24, 2006 05:51 | #14 I think the more expensive lens is #2. I also think I'm hungry for toast and marmalade. Canon 350D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stav_98 Goldmember  1,054 posts Likes: 6 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Norfolk, UK More info | Mar 24, 2006 06:02 | #15 Hard to tell as they're not the same image, I mean in terms it's taken from a different angle or the jar was moved. Did you use a tripod? == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ==
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1087 guests, 149 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
which is your point I guess. If I had to plump for one I'd say #1