Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Aug 2019 (Sunday) 23:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 18-35 dock AF adjust - Issues & resolution.

 
n1as
Goldmember
2,330 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Salem, OR
     
Aug 25, 2019 23:58 |  #1

Been swapping gear around. Got a used 7D II body and some lenses including a brand new Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 with the dock. I went through the micro focus adjust dance with all the lenses saving the Sigma for last.

I dialed the Sigma in at the 3 close distances and was able to get it spot on. Very reliable, very repeatable. Beautiful. But infinity was totally terrible. The lens would grossly back focus then front focus at infinity. Totally not repeatable. I figured I'd have to exchange it for another.

Then I had an idea. What if I first adjusted the W and T micro-focus settings in the 7D II and then used the dock to fine tune it from there?

Much to my surprise, the lens was terribly inconsistent at infinity until I found the right micro-focus setting. Then it settled down and behaved like a normal lens. After getting the W and T values dialed in on the 7D II then went back to the dock.

Dock values were different this time but again, the lens was stunningly consistent and repeatable. It was pretty easy to get it all dialed in for the 3 close distances. I went outside and shot some infinity pics, making sure I had stuff in the foreground to find any front-focus. Sure enough, the lens was repeatable and front-focused at 18mm. Back to the Sigma dock and dial in some FF correction and that did the trick. Sharp images at infinity!!!

What was so shocking to me was how random AF was until I got the in-camera MFA values set. Now, mind you the lens is not 100%. I still get some infinity pics that are not in focus but the number is probably in the 10% or less category rather than the 80% to 90% that it was.


- Keith
http://darwinphoto.zen​folio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Aug 26, 2019 01:16 |  #2

welcome to sigma!


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ah-keong
Goldmember
Avatar
1,297 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2660
Joined Apr 2016
     
Aug 27, 2019 02:28 |  #3

Lucky that my copy was good out of the box without the need for dock.  :p


Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
Speedlite 430EX III-RT | 600EX-RT |
Manfrotto BeFree Travel | MT055XPRO3 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
n1as
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,330 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Salem, OR
     
Aug 30, 2019 13:06 |  #4

I got nervous about AF accuracy for the lens so I bought a used EF-S 17-55 think I'd ship the Sigma back.

I dialed in the micro-focus on the EF-S and then did a walkabout with both lenses, shooting the same scene at the same settings to compare the lenses. After some 50 shots each, I found the AF accuracy of the Sigma at f/2.8 equaled the Canon wide open at f/2.8. They both had 20+ accurate focus events and only one miss.

At f/1.8 the in-focus rate for the Sigma was worse but it still hit focus more times than it missed. I suspect I could improve the infinity f/1.8 performace by some more attention to the MFA settings in the camera.

While the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM is a great lens the Sigma is a more interesting lens. It can do the shallower DoF that you don't get on a crop sensor at f/1.8 and it produces crisper sunstars at f/16. At the mid aperatures, the Sigma and Canon are both sharp but the Sigma is sharper at the edges & corners, especially toward the telephoto end of their range.

So which do I keep?

Both, of course :-)


- Keith
http://darwinphoto.zen​folio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ah-keong
Goldmember
Avatar
1,297 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2660
Joined Apr 2016
     
Sep 04, 2019 03:41 |  #5

From experience, I would not use AI servo when using the Sigma.
If accuracy is required, I would use the live view - Dual Pixel CMOS AF which the 7Dii has.

It would be better to change a new copy if your copy don't work consistently.  :p


Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
Speedlite 430EX III-RT | 600EX-RT |
Manfrotto BeFree Travel | MT055XPRO3 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Sep 05, 2019 09:06 |  #6

I've always found myself to have been extremely lucky with Sigma stuff - dozens of lenses, and probably just as many bodies (hundreds of possibilities)
ever since adjustments were available in-camera, I either didn't have to change a thing, or the changes were minimal and quick.
Then the global line came out, with the dock, and same thing... minimal if anything, and quick to do

Until I got the 1D IV..... actually, until a friend decided to mount the Sig35A to my 1D4.... in-camera would not adjust it at all - would come close, but not close enough!
I never noticed because, to me, the 35 on a crop isn't a thing I want to do all that much...
Every other Sig lenses I could throw at it is just fine.

I haven't bothered taking it through the dock to make it better - if I'm using the 35, it would be on a full frame


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
     
Sep 06, 2019 23:06 |  #7

n1as wrote in post #18916626 (external link)
Been swapping gear around. Got a used 7D II body and some lenses including a brand new Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 with the dock. I went through the micro focus adjust dance with all the lenses saving the Sigma for last.

I dialed the Sigma in at the 3 close distances and was able to get it spot on. Very reliable, very repeatable. Beautiful. But infinity was totally terrible. The lens would grossly back focus then front focus at infinity. Totally not repeatable. I figured I'd have to exchange it for another.

Then I had an idea. What if I first adjusted the W and T micro-focus settings in the 7D II and then used the dock to fine tune it from there?

Much to my surprise, the lens was terribly inconsistent at infinity until I found the right micro-focus setting. Then it settled down and behaved like a normal lens. After getting the W and T values dialed in on the 7D II then went back to the dock.

Dock values were different this time but again, the lens was stunningly consistent and repeatable. It was pretty easy to get it all dialed in for the 3 close distances. I went outside and shot some infinity pics, making sure I had stuff in the foreground to find any front-focus. Sure enough, the lens was repeatable and front-focused at 18mm. Back to the Sigma dock and dial in some FF correction and that did the trick. Sharp images at infinity!!!

What was so shocking to me was how random AF was until I got the in-camera MFA values set. Now, mind you the lens is not 100%. I still get some infinity pics that are not in focus but the number is probably in the 10% or less category rather than the 80% to 90% that it was.

That is interesting because I did something similar with my Sigma 18-35 on my 7D Mark II. I adjusted the camera's lens micro adjustment first and then fine tuned the settings using the dock.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,938 views & 1 like for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Sigma 18-35 dock AF adjust - Issues & resolution.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1249 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.