cc please
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Sep 06, 2019 16:18 | #1 cc please Image hosted by forum (997645) © Evertking [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 07, 2019 00:49 | #2 Focus and exposure look good; but I don't like the wide-angle distortion, especially for the guy on the right. In this situation I'd pose them closer together to avoid wide-angle lens. Put a jacket on the groom to make him stand out and place his arm around her waist thus closer. Have the other guys with their right hands on the shoulder of the guy to the right (to get them squeezed together) Girls can place their hands around the waists of girls on their left. -- Image Editing OK --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OhLook insufferably pedantic. I can live with that. 24,910 posts Gallery: 105 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 16339 Joined Dec 2012 Location: California: SF Bay Area More info | Sep 07, 2019 01:27 | #3 The women line up nicely by height; the men don't. Only about half the crew are looking at the camera. I agree with Qbx that the B & G should touch, not necessarily arm around waist, but something. Hand position isn't uniform among the bridesmaids. PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | Sep 08, 2019 21:55 | #4 I don't mind the confetti on the ground. Its a celebration... confetti emphasizes that. It is obviously a more casual venue... so it works fine in this setting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FarmerTed1971 fondling the 5D4 More info | Sep 08, 2019 22:03 | #5 Good critiques here. Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
olafsosh I am a nice and fluffy dude More info Post edited over 4 years ago by olafs osh. | Sep 21, 2019 15:25 | #6 Qbx wrote in post #18922767 Focus and exposure look good... Nope. Exposure was way off and the highlights were blown. Blown awaaaaaaay. At least it looks like judging by the faces and shadows - they're all red and burned. Shadows are non-existent in their natural sense. If there is no other way and you have to give this image away, I would recommend some split-toning first and then decrease the saturation, especially in reds/oranges/yellows - play with them. It will make an image a tad artsy-fartsy, but overall impression will be def better. - Olafs Osh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | Sep 23, 2019 14:49 | #7 olafs osh wrote in post #18930707 Nope. Exposure was way off and the highlights were blown. Blown awaaaaaaay. At least it looks like judging by the faces and shadows - they're all red and burned. Shadows are non-existent in their natural sense. If there is no other way and you have to give this image away, I would recommend some split-toning first and then decrease the saturation, especially in reds/oranges/yellows - play with them. It will make an image a tad artsy-fartsy, but overall impression will be def better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | Sep 23, 2019 17:13 | #8 Lovely picture. Excuse my arrogance, I would just tell what my first impression at the look at this picture. One Beatles song.. M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 28, 2019 20:22 | #9 Question --------------- did you leave the lens hood off the lens? vadenphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 972 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||