Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 09 Sep 2019 (Monday) 15:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best Lens for Hot Air Balloon Ride?

 
Greg_8
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 345
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Michigan, Northern Lower & Eastern Upper
     
Sep 09, 2019 15:21 |  #1

Weather permitting, I will try my first balloon ride this week. I was wondering if anyone has taken a hot air balloon ride and what lens they would recommend from the following?

My available choices -

100-400mm
24-105mm
70-200mm
100mm macro prime
50mm f1.4 prime

Thanks for any counsel you can provide?


Keep 'em flying,
Greg B

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27755
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
     
Sep 09, 2019 18:52 |  #2

What are your goals during the ride? Images of the balloon, or images on the ground?

If taking images of things on the ground, the 100-400 is nice. Images of the balloon and people inside, the 24-105- this would also be a general purpose lens if I wasn't sure what I'd shoot.

There isn't a lot of space inside the basket (usually), so keep in mind opportunities to change lenses may be limited. If I could only take one lens, it would be the 24-105. Wide enough for wide angle shots, get good landscape images, and still see some objects on the ground.

I'll often shoot from a small plane at 1000 - 2000 feet above the ground and I rarely need more than 400 mm on a crop sensor for closeups of ground objects. Chances are you'll be lower so the 24-105 would still be my choice. The images are balloons flying at or below the altitudes I like to fly at. I was taking the picture of the vulture in the second image and I didn't notice the balloon until I looked at the picture. The first picture shows how little space you may have in the basket. Use the camera strap!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Greg_8
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 345
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Michigan, Northern Lower & Eastern Upper
     
Sep 09, 2019 21:20 as a reply to  @ Capn Jack's post |  #3

Very helpful info for me to plan. Thousand Thanks Jack.


Keep 'em flying,
Greg B

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited over 4 years ago by John from PA. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 10, 2019 10:40 |  #4

If limited to a single lens, definitely the 24-105. You have lots of time for shots from the ground while the ballon is filled, then aerial shots as it lifts off and travels to it end point.

This balloon launched a 1/2 mile from where I live. One of the largest in the world at 190 feet tall, 115 feet wide and weighing in at 992#.

Smartphone picture, crappy at best.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/09/2/LQ_998367.jpg
Image hosted by forum (998367) © John from PA [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Capn ­ Jack
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,179 posts
Gallery: 2961 photos
Likes: 27755
Joined Mar 2010
Location: NE USA
Post edited over 4 years ago by Capn Jack with reason 'Add quote'.
     
Sep 10, 2019 17:21 |  #5

John from PA wrote in post #18924545 (external link)
If limited to a single lens, definitely the 24-105. You have lots of time for shots from the ground while the ballon is filled, then aerial shots as it lifts off and travels to it end point.

This balloon launched a 1/2 mile from where I live. One of the largest in the world at 190 feet tall, 115 feet wide and weighing in at 992#.

Smartphone picture, crappy at best.
Hosted photo: posted by John from PA in
./showthread.php?p=189​24545&i=i243146688
forum: Nature & Landscapes

Without the hot air  :p

I'm just playing with you a little; a cubic meter of air weighs ~1.3 kilograms at sea level. Heated to 100 °C, the density would be ~1 kg/m^3. I guestimate that balloon needs about 2000 cubic meters to lift 1200 pounds (balloon, a couple of people). So it weighs on the order of 2000 kg + 992 lb -> 4400 lb + 992 lb -> 5392 pounds when inflated!

Greg_8 wrote in post #18924276 (external link)
Very helpful info for me to plan. Thousand Thanks Jack.

You are most welcome!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Sep 10, 2019 17:38 |  #6

Once you reach a stable altitude, I would play with the idea of taking a ton of overlapping shots of the scenery, zoomed in at 105mm and then stitching them all together later. You get the benefits of all that detail by being zoomed in, but also the wide angle view. Just lock in your exposure settings right out the gate and do a matrix set of shots like 6 rows of 5 images each all overlapping each other by at least 1/3.

You will end up with something like a 80Mpx image, but could zoom all the way into the scene. Pretty fun!

I did that from the top of a condo at the gulf with my M50.
https://teamspeed.smug​mug.com …f-Shores-2019/i-Q7kN9WV/A (external link)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Greg_8
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 345
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Michigan, Northern Lower & Eastern Upper
     
Sep 10, 2019 21:27 |  #7

More excellent counsel. Thanks all. I appreciate you taking the time to reply.


Keep 'em flying,
Greg B

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nick2000
Member
130 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 794
Joined Oct 2019
     
Nov 02, 2019 15:18 |  #8

In my recent trip to Arizona, I took ballon ride and realised that 24-105 is more than sufficient, amount of space inside ballon is very tight. Enjoy Your ballon experience :) :)


some of my other photos, feel free to look and comment https://www.flickr.com​/photos/litwinienko/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Greg_8
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 345
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Michigan, Northern Lower & Eastern Upper
     
Nov 02, 2019 18:54 as a reply to  @ nick2000's post |  #9

Thanks Nick


Keep 'em flying,
Greg B

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trailblazer
Senior Member
Avatar
613 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Dec 2007
     
Nov 02, 2019 21:33 |  #10

Good advice here. I'll warn you that it's very hot in a hot air balloon. I felt like I was baking as I was close to the fire.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,096 views & 3 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Best Lens for Hot Air Balloon Ride?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
910 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.