Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Sep 2019 (Saturday) 02:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

yongnuo 35 f2

 
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 28, 2019 02:28 |  #1

is this lens terrible? i've been fine with my super old 35mm f2 lens...works fine, sharp enough...but i dropped it, and it won't focus anymore...second time i've done that, and the first time it cost me $120 to fix it...i could try and fix it myself...or i could just grab one of these cheap yognuo ones for less...i plan to mainly use it on my 5Dc, so critical sharpness isn't that important to me really


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spencerphoto
Goldmember
1,079 posts
Gallery: 90 photos
Likes: 1719
Joined Sep 2018
Location: Near Brisbane
     
Sep 28, 2019 04:11 |  #2
bannedPermanently

Define "critical sharpness"?


5D3, 7D2, EF 16-35 f/2.8L, EF 24-70 f/2.8L II, EF 24-105 f/4L, EF 70-200 f/2.8L II, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II, EF 1.4x III, Sigma 150mm macro, Lumix LX100 plus a cupboard full of bags, tripods, flashes & stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Sep 28, 2019 12:22 |  #3

Spencerphoto wrote in post #18934550 (external link)
Define "critical sharpness"?

Critical sharpness is defined as the sharpest achievable result from a given combination of lens and camera under the exact same conditions. For example if your lens is the absolute sharpest it will get @ F/8 and you are using it at F/4 your images may be sharp but not critically so. Semantics aside it is abundantly clear the OP is asking whether he can expect results approaching the Canon 35 F/2 with the Yognuo or if it is a dud.

DreDaze - I don't have personal experience with the Yognuo but I did find a direct comparison with the Canon if you already haven't come across it yourself. Hope it helps you out.

https://petapixel.com …nuo-35mm-f2-for-canon-ef/ (external link)


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
THREAD ­ STARTER
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 28, 2019 16:33 |  #4

Spencerphoto wrote in post #18934550 (external link)
Define "critical sharpness"?

i don't even know...i guess i'm not looking for the sharpest thing around...i'm not expecting L glass quality from something so cheap

Trvlr323 wrote in post #18934710 (external link)
Critical sharpness is defined as the sharpest achievable result from a given combination of lens and camera under the exact same conditions. For example if your lens is the absolute sharpest it will get @ F/8 and you are using it at F/4 your images may be sharp but not critically so. Semantics aside it is abundantly clear the OP is asking whether he can expect results approaching the Canon 35 F/2 with the Yognuo or if it is a dud.

DreDaze - I don't have personal experience with the Yognuo but I did find a direct comparison with the Canon if you already haven't come across it yourself. Hope it helps you out.

https://petapixel.com …nuo-35mm-f2-for-canon-ef/ (external link)

thanks


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 4 years ago by Choderboy.
     
Sep 29, 2019 05:07 |  #5

There are 3 threads for this lens in Lens Sample forum. 1 only has a single post. The other 2 have no complaints about lack of sharpness.

Just search Lens Sample forums for "Yongnuo", no need for "35"


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spencerphoto
Goldmember
1,079 posts
Gallery: 90 photos
Likes: 1719
Joined Sep 2018
Location: Near Brisbane
     
Sep 29, 2019 05:16 |  #6
bannedPermanently

Trvlr323 wrote in post #18934710 (external link)
... Semantics aside it is abundantly clear the OP is asking whether he can expect results approaching the Canon 35 F/2 with the Yognuo or if it is a dud.

That's not how I read it. If the question really was that simple, surely he would have worded it that way?

The OP has since 'clarified' his expectations as "not expecting L glass quality", which doesn't help much.

This is why I asked what HIS definition of "critical sharpness" is, because I assumed it was a turn of phrase rather than a precise, measurable quality.


5D3, 7D2, EF 16-35 f/2.8L, EF 24-70 f/2.8L II, EF 24-105 f/4L, EF 70-200 f/2.8L II, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L II, EF 1.4x III, Sigma 150mm macro, Lumix LX100 plus a cupboard full of bags, tripods, flashes & stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Sep 29, 2019 05:32 |  #7

I don't think I've ever seen anything positive said about any of the YN lenses.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
King ­ Kenny
Goldmember
Avatar
2,035 posts
Gallery: 1763 photos
Likes: 6647
Joined Dec 2016
Location: Westbury, Wiltshire.
     
Sep 29, 2019 06:26 |  #8

I have a Yongnuo 50mm f1.8 II and I find it very good and only£50. Coincidently, I dropped it the other day and it still works fine. For the price you can't go wrong.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/09/5/LQ_1001744.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1001744) © King Kenny [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

"I don't Know where I am but I'm having a lovely time."

Kenny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 4 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Sep 29, 2019 08:12 |  #9

King Kenny wrote in post #18935148 (external link)
I have a Yongnuo 50mm f1.8 II and I find it very good and only£50. Coincidently, I dropped it the other day and it still works fine. For the price you can't go wrong.
Hosted photo: posted by King Kenny in
./showthread.php?p=189​35148&i=i236547931
forum: Canon Lenses

I understand the price vs performance argument but F/11 isn't much of a challenge.

I got a copy of the latest used Canon 50mm 1.8 STM for 70 bucks, and from a reputable PoTN member. Hard to go wrong.

Edit: forgot this was a 35mm thread, don't meant to hijack


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Sep 30, 2019 09:10 |  #10

I would rather spend money on the samyang 35 1.4 instead of a lens from yongnuo, even if it is a MF lens. Or find the Canon OE 35mm that yongnuo copied: https://www.mpb.com …3AxgceEAQYBSABE​gLhcPD_BwE (external link)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
THREAD ­ STARTER
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 30, 2019 10:52 |  #11

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18935780 (external link)
I would rather spend money on the samyang 35 1.4 instead of a lens from yongnuo, even if it is a MF lens. Or find the Canon OE 35mm that yongnuo copied: https://www.mpb.com …3AxgceEAQYBSABE​gLhcPD_BwE (external link)

thanks, but i have no interest in MF...i'd be using it on my 5dc more than anything, so it's not the easiest body for me to manual focus...i've already got the canon that yongnuo copied, but i dropped it, and it won't focus at all...and i know the repair cost would be more than the yognuo


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 4 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Sep 30, 2019 14:09 |  #12

Just so you aware, the Yongnuo aren't just relabeled Canon lenses. They are actually differently manufactured lenses, there have been teardowns and testing of the 50mm for example, not the same lens, despite they looking very similar on the outside. The outside is a copycat, the inside can be junk. They have copied the 2xIII, 50 1.8, 35 f2, and who knows what else, but they don't work the same or have the same internals.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Oct 14, 2019 23:03 |  #13

When I was looking for a 'cheap' 35mm, I looked into the Yognuo but there were not a lot of good things said about it. Seemed like it was a bona-fide $70 lens, not a gem.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,032 views & 2 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
yongnuo 35 f2
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1490 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.