Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 30 Sep 2019 (Monday) 22:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Colorado Abstract?

 
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Sep 30, 2019 22:37 |  #1

I visited my daughter's family in Colorado just in time for fall color. Here's an odd one that I like but it may be a bit abstract for some. The lines have more of a "graphic design" feel than most landscapes and you may think the sky is too blue. And the deep black in the trees on the front hill is supposed to be a photo-no-no. I'm not yet sure what I think but I am drawn to it. I would appreciate comments.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/09/5/LQ_1002054.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1002054) © rgs [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,834 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16185
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 30, 2019 22:45 |  #2

That's not at all what I understand the word "abstract" to mean. The color seems enhanced, but everything in the frame is recognizable.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Sep 30, 2019 22:46 as a reply to  @ OhLook's post |  #3

Maybe graphic is a better choice.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
patrick ­ j
Goldmember
2,453 posts
Gallery: 76 photos
Likes: 8653
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Denver
     
Oct 01, 2019 17:40 |  #4

The colors don't bother me, they look good actually, or the shadows, but a road is a strong leading line, and having it right on the edge makes the photo feel unbalanced to me. I think just standing out there in the middle of the road might have been the way to go, as long as you are going to have it in the photo, make it more prominent. That weed on the right side of the picture is a bit of a distraction too. Of course, without seeing the whole scene we can't know if you were framing it to keep stuff out of the shot, like maybe there is a hamburger stand just out of the picture on the left.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Oct 01, 2019 18:11 as a reply to  @ patrick j's post |  #5

Thanks Patrick. I've looked at that road quite a bit. I agree it fights the balance in the photo and it would be easy enough to clone out but I think the tension it produces actually helps. It seems to me that most of the other lines in the photo meet between the first and second hill so the bit of incongruity shakes things up. I think the foreground would be a bit dull without the road. However. that stalk in the lower right does not seem to important Thanks for a very interesting comment.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

814 views & 1 like for this thread, 3 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Colorado Abstract?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1060 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.