Or is it me? On my monitor the edges look jagged.
beachgirl Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | Mar 24, 2006 19:11 | #1 Or is it me? On my monitor the edges look jagged.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
buffalopc7 Member 71 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Buffalo, NY More info | Mar 24, 2006 19:14 | #2 Not on my monitor, nope (18" lcd). Edges look sharp, nice shot!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poco Member 233 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 Location: Port Coquitlam, B.C. More info | Mar 24, 2006 19:18 | #3 Aside from the JPG compression artifacts that image looks good. Try posting a small100% crop so you can turn down the compression. http://notions.okuda.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbze430 Goldmember 2,454 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Chino Hills More info | Mar 24, 2006 19:28 | #4 I don't see the picture!!! I'm blind! Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Mar 24, 2006 19:29 | #5 I see compression artifacts (normal) when I get a couple inches from my 19" LCD screen, but aside from that it's a beautifully sharp shot...and a great capture to boot! Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | Poco wrote: Aside from the JPG compression artifacts that image looks good. Try posting a small100% crop so you can turn down the compression. Poco, can you explain 100% crop? Newbie alert.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | beachgirl wrote: Poco, can you explain 100% crop? Newbie alert. PeAcE. Jenny I can. It's where you enlarge an image to 100% view in your image editor and just crop out a small section. Don't resize that section or anything. Just crop it out and save it as-is. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | And Big thanks to eveyone for the nice words. If it weren't for the questions i had i wouldn't have shown anyone this. Glad I posted it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | cdi-ink.com wrote: I can. It's where you enlarge an image to 100% view in your image editor and just crop out a small section. Don't resize that section or anything. Just crop it out and save it as-is. Should I enlarge one of the problem areas??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | beachgirl wrote: Should I enlarge one of the problem areas?? Don't enlarge it. Just view it at 100% on your screen and crop it. That's it. Don't crop it to resize either. You want a "life size" portion of the image. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | cdi-ink.com wrote: Don't enlarge it. Just view it at 100% on your screen and crop it. That's it. Don't crop it to resize either. You want a "life size" portion of the image. OK cdi-ink, will do it now. And post it after?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Meaty0 Goldmember 3,519 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia More info | It's a good shot BG. A good 'feel' to it. Nice pose, composition, good skin color and tone, and WB seems good too. I see only a few JPEG artifacts. Did you shoot RAW? If not, what size image did you shoot on the camera? Part of the problem is the 100KB limit for image attachments, so you might want to post your images using Image Hosting like Imageshack or similar.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Mar 24, 2006 20:25 | #13 That image is only 33.49KB...nowhere near the attachment limit. The artifacts are compression, guaranteed. That's severe. BUT it doesn't look bad if I'm a normal distance from my monitor. Cut back on the compression and you won't see these "jaggies". Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beachgirl THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,099 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay) More info | cdi-ink.com wrote: That image is only 33.49KB...nowhere near the attachment limit. The artifacts are compression, guaranteed. That's severe. BUT it doesn't look bad if I'm a normal distance from my monitor. Cut back on the compression and you won't see these "jaggies". How do I cut back on the compression??I know total newbie.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | beachgirl wrote: How do I cut back on the compression??I know total newbie. jenny I don't know what software you use, but in Photoshop, you can Save for Web or Save As and choose a percentage or scale (quality). The higher the percentage or number on the scale, the bigger the file, but the higher the quality and less compression artifacts you see. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1734 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||