Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Dec 2019 (Sunday) 23:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What Short Prime for 80D?

 
Temma
Senior Member
990 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 690
Joined Sep 2009
Location: North Olmsted, Ohio
Post edited over 3 years ago by Temma.
     
Dec 01, 2019 23:31 |  #1

I just ordered a refurbed 80 from Canon.

I've got a basic set of lenses:

  • Canon 18-55 STM
  • Canon 55-250 STM
  • Tokina 100mm macro
  • Soligor 500mm mirror
  • Opteka 500mm mirror
  • Amscope 4x finite objective
  • Amscope10x finite objective.


Between the 80D and a new car, I can't afford L class lenses in the near term.

24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 40mm? What would most closely approximate a 50mm on a full frame?

I'm thinking about one of the Canon STM lenses but would consider other brands in the same price range.

This would mostly be for casual urban photography.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 3 years ago by Archibald. (4 edits in all)
     
Dec 02, 2019 00:21 |  #2

There is the EF-S 28mm f/2.8 STM or the EF 40mm STM or the EF 50mm STM.

If I were you, I would review the performance of the different prime options carefully before buying. I was pondering getting a sharp prime in the normal range a couple of weeks ago. My answer after due research was to just stick with my 18-135mm USM zoom. The zoom is plenty sharp and is so versatile. I found little advantage in sharpness reported for the primes.

Your 18-55mm STM is probably slightly sharper than the 18-135mm.

You could go with the 28 and/or 50 if you need speed. They are not that expensive.

I have the 50mm II and it never gets used.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Temma
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
990 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 690
Joined Sep 2009
Location: North Olmsted, Ohio
Post edited over 3 years ago by Temma.
     
Dec 02, 2019 04:17 |  #3

Archibald wrote in post #18968824 (external link)
There is the EF-S 28mm f/2.8 STM or the EF 40mm STM or the EF 50mm STM.

If I were you, I would review the performance of the different prime options carefully before buying. I was pondering getting a sharp prime in the normal range a couple of weeks ago. My answer after due research was to just stick with my 18-135mm USM zoom. The zoom is plenty sharp and is so versatile. I found little advantage in sharpness reported for the primes.

Your 18-55mm STM is probably slightly sharper than the 18-135mm.

You could go with the 28 and/or 50 if you need speed. They are not that expensive.

I have the 50mm II and it never gets used.

I'm very happy with the my two STM lenses. The only drawback to them is that like most reasonably priced zooms, they're not as fast or quite as sharp as a prime.

What I'm looking for is a prime that's:

  • Equivalent on my APS-C camera to a 50mm on a full frame
  • Better in low light than my 18-55mm
  • Better bokeh than the 18-55mm
  • Reasonably priced


In practical terms, I'm not sure which one that equates to. I've got a lot of experience with 35mm film SLRs, and APS-C DSLRs, but none with full frame DSLRs.

I guess I'm looking for something that I can afford that would behave similarly to the 50mms on my Minolta XG-1 and my Vivitar.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,521 posts
Gallery: 1260 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 33465
Joined Oct 2015
Location: Darwin, Straya
     
Dec 02, 2019 05:10 |  #4

Temma wrote in post #18968885 (external link)
I'm very happy with the my two STM lenses. The only drawback to them is that like most reasonably priced zooms, they're not as fast or quite as sharp as a prime.

What I'm looking for is a prime that's:
  • Equivalent on my APS-C camera to a 50mm on a full frame
  • Better in low light than my 18-55mm
  • Better bokeh than the 18-55mm
  • Reasonably priced


In practical terms, I'm not sure which one that equates to. I've got a lot of experience with 35mm film SLRs, and APS-C DSLRs, but none with full frame DSLRs.

I guess I'm looking for something that I can afford that would behave similarly to the 50mms on my Minolta XG-1 and my Vivitar.

I have an 80D and most of the STM lenses. My favourite is the 24mm pancake. I must have lucked into a good copy because it's very sharp. OTOH my 40mm pancake seems a bit soft. Other than that you might want to look at the EF 35mm f/2 IS. People say it's a great lens and has a FOV similar to a 56mm on full frame.


Still waiting for the wisdom they promised would be worth getting old for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Dec 02, 2019 09:55 |  #5

Temma wrote in post #18968885 (external link)
I'm very happy with the my two STM lenses. The only drawback to them is that like most reasonably priced zooms, they're not as fast or quite as sharp as a prime.

What I'm looking for is a prime that's:
  • Equivalent on my APS-C camera to a 50mm on a full frame
  • Better in low light than my 18-55mm
  • Better bokeh than the 18-55mm
  • Reasonably priced


In practical terms, I'm not sure which one that equates to. I've got a lot of experience with 35mm film SLRs, and APS-C DSLRs, but none with full frame DSLRs.

I guess I'm looking for something that I can afford that would behave similarly to the 50mms on my Minolta XG-1 and my Vivitar.

As far as equivalence is concerned, there is no mystery about that. For a crop factor of 1.6, you want a focal length of 31 mm to give the same angle of view as a 50mm on FF.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duckster
Goldmember
2,782 posts
Gallery: 466 photos
Likes: 3880
Joined May 2017
     
Dec 02, 2019 11:24 |  #6

I have the 24mm STM f2.8 pancake for use on my APS-C cameras. I have found it to be a really nice and sharp lens for the money. Not a super fast AF however.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Temma
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
990 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 690
Joined Sep 2009
Location: North Olmsted, Ohio
     
Dec 02, 2019 11:36 |  #7

Pippan wrote in post #18968907 (external link)
I have an 80D and most of the STM lenses. My favourite is the 24mm pancake. I must have lucked into a good copy because it's very sharp. OTOH my 40mm pancake seems a bit soft. Other than that you might want to look at the EF 35mm f/2 IS. People say it's a great lens and has a FOV similar to a 56mm on full frame.

I'll probably grab the 35mm around summer of next year.

Thanks for the recommendation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Dec 02, 2019 11:40 |  #8

If you want something starkly different, prime-like, on an APS-C for your upcoming 80D that is significantly different than your 18-55 STM (which is quite a sharp lens too), Canon doesn't really have much for you other than a 35 F2 or 28 F1.8.

This is where Sigma comes in with 30mm F1.4 ART at $350.

https://www.amazon.com …-Lens-Canon/dp/B00BQXL8BU (external link)

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Post edited over 3 years ago by Archibald.
     
Dec 02, 2019 11:50 |  #9

Temma wrote in post #18968885 (external link)
I'm very happy with the my two STM lenses. The only drawback to them is that like most reasonably priced zooms, they're not as fast or quite as sharp as a prime.

Lots of people think you need a prime for sharpness and that kit lenses are not very good. What I was suggesting was to do some research to see if the primes of interest really are sharper. Below is a chart that I compiled from opticallimits.com comparing the 24mm STM and the 18-55mm STM at 24mm. You can see that the sharpness is roughly the same. The prime does not have an advantage in sharpness. This is why I suggested checking before buying.

https://www.opticallim​its.com/Reviews/overvi​ew#canon_aps (external link)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2019/12/1/LQ_1013471.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1013471) © Archibald [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Temma
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
990 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Likes: 690
Joined Sep 2009
Location: North Olmsted, Ohio
     
Dec 02, 2019 11:54 |  #10

MalVeauX wrote in post #18969037 (external link)
If you want something starkly different, prime-like, on an APS-C for your upcoming 80D that is significantly different than your 18-55 STM (which is quite a sharp lens too), Canon doesn't really have much for you other than a 35 F2 or 28 F1.8.

This is where Sigma comes in with 30mm F1.4 ART at $350.

https://www.amazon.com …-Lens-Canon/dp/B00BQXL8BU (external link)

Very best,

As I said I'm not averse to other brands, so I'll definitely consider the Sigma.

Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
premature adulation
2,668 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 645
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Dec 02, 2019 13:37 |  #11

Also consider the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8. It'll give you a full frame equivalent framing of 29-56mm, is nice and sharp, and has a "near prime" maximum aperture.


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited over 3 years ago by John from PA.
     
Dec 02, 2019 14:33 |  #12

sploo wrote in post #18969095 (external link)
Also consider the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8. It'll give you a full frame equivalent framing of 29-56mm, is nice and sharp, and has a "near prime" maximum aperture.

The place to get that lens is at Adorama. The lens comes up as a “Base” offering which is just the lens at $639. But if you toggle from “Base” to “With Accessories” the price won’t change and although you get a bunch of so-so items, if you scroll down on the “details” you will see that you also get the Sigma dock.

The link is https://www.adorama.co​m/sg1835dceosa.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bseitz234
Senior Member
Avatar
608 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 381
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Maynard, MA, USA
     
Dec 03, 2019 11:24 |  #13

I ended up with the 28 f/1.8 USM when I wanted a normal walkaround prime for my original 7D. It's never been optically the best, but it's smaller and lighter than a zoom, and definitely faster. Still have it and use it occasionally, though I really should ditch it- the 35 f/2 IS is better in every measure. There's also the Tamron 35 f/1.8 VC, which hasn't been mentioned yet. I have the 45mm version and love that lens, but it's a bit longer than "normal" on a crop camera. The 45mm can be had for a song (I've seen under $300), the 35 is usually a bit more expensive, but not much...

I do think the EF-S 24mm STM is a great little lens, but I don't grab it for most of the reasons you mention wanting a prime- I grab it when I want the smallest, lightest least-obtrusive camera possible. It pretty much lives on a Rebel SL2, but I will occasionally throw it on the 7D2. And I find it maddening that the EF-M pancake is f/2 and the EF-S is f/2.8, but that's a different rant...

Anyway, my first choice would be the 35 f/2 IS, followed by the Tamron f/1.8 VC, followed by the Canon 28 f/1.8, followed by the EF-S 24.



-Brian
5 EOS bodies, and constantly growing lens selection.
IG @bseitz234

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
duckster
Goldmember
2,782 posts
Gallery: 466 photos
Likes: 3880
Joined May 2017
     
Dec 03, 2019 12:50 |  #14

I love the 50mm f1.8 STM on my crop sensor cameras as a walk around lens but it is not as wide as you mentioned. I probably use the 17-55 F2.8 EF-S lens the most as a "all purpose" lens




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
troehr
Goldmember
1,065 posts
Likes: 489
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand
     
Dec 03, 2019 21:20 |  #15

sploo wrote in post #18969095 (external link)
Also consider the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8. It'll give you a full frame equivalent framing of 29-56mm, is nice and sharp, and has a "near prime" maximum aperture.


This is what I would suggest also. Mine is glued to one of my bodies.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,823 views & 6 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
What Short Prime for 80D?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1026 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.