Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 11 Dec 2019 (Wednesday) 20:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

(EOS R) Can I focus -while- holding the Depth-of-Field Preview Button?

 
vanillaslice
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2019
     
Dec 11, 2019 20:25 |  #1

Hey all,

I've been using the EOS-R for almost a year and now my only issue with the camera is being unable to focus while using DOF Preview. I've used Canons DSLRs in the past and used the feature frequently. I find it extremely beneficial being able to see what is exactly going to be in focus before I take the photo.

I'm aware that you need to bind DOF Preview to a button, and I've done that. However I'm not able to focus while holding the button down. Making it a really clunky process of repeatedly pressing it as I make adjustments to the focus. Is there anyway of keeping the lens stopped down while focusing?

It works in video mode, so I don't see why this shouldn't be available while taking photos. I am aware that the EOS R keeps the aperture fully open to make it easier for AF, MF, Exposure Simulation, ect...

Any help would be appreciated, thanks guys!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Dec 12, 2019 09:51 |  #2

Since focusing stopped down is less precise, perhaps they block focusing whilst stopping down? Most EF lenses have mechanical manual focus, so there the camera is unable to prevent focusing while checking the depth of field.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vanillaslice
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2019
Post edited over 3 years ago by vanillaslice.
     
Dec 13, 2019 21:51 as a reply to  @ apersson850's post |  #3

How is focusing stopped down less precise? I don't understand that concept.

Isn't focusing with the aperture wide open, when really it's going to be a much wider DOF less precise? (As long your aperture isn't set to the lowest possible)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 13, 2019 22:13 |  #4

vanillaslice wrote in post #18974751 (external link)
How is focusing stopped down less precise? I don't understand that concept.

Isn't focusing with the aperture wide open, when really it's going to be a much wider DOF less precise? (As long your aperture isn't set to the lowest possible)

I can think of three reasons.
1. DOF is reliant on image size. When you review an image that is 3" in size, the dof will be different than on an 8x10 print.
2. You don't have enough pixels to accurately assess DOF. Take a blurry image now and shrink it down to a 1mp image. It will look a lot sharper.
3. As you close the aperture you are also making the image darker thus it's much more difficult to assess anything.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,469 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4570
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 3 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Dec 14, 2019 15:59 |  #5

vanillaslice wrote in post #18974751 (external link)
How is focusing stopped down less precise? I don't understand that concept.

Isn't focusing with the aperture wide open, when really it's going to be a much wider DOF less precise? (As long your aperture isn't set to the lowest possible)


Think of focus as 'attaining a certain amount of acceptable fuzziness'...when DOF is 1' deep you can be perhaps 4-5" in error and the camera still thinks 'acceptable enough amount of fuzziness'. (speaking purely for conceptual illustration only, not based upon the actual amount of 'acceptable fuzziness' programmed into a camera!) If the DOF is 100' deep (when focusing stopped down), you might be in error by 30' yet the camera still thinks 'acceptable enough amount of fuzziness', but you are truly 30' in error away from 'optimum' focus point.

I made this illustration a long time ago, but it helps to illustrate DOF

IMAGE: https://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/DOF%20zone_zpslnv5b7m4.jpg

With a subject distance like 20' the range of distances between the 'perceived in focus' line is pretty narrow at wide open (focus) aperture, but if the range of distances between the 'perceived in focus' line pair is pretty wide because of small aperture during DOF Preview, you can be a lot more 'in error' away from the Plane of Focus.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
inthedeck
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,579 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1140
Joined Sep 2006
Location: St. Augustine, Florida
     
Dec 14, 2019 17:34 |  #6

Plus, why would you need that, when you have the focus accuracy pointers in your view finder, if enabled? Secondly, focus peaking is a way better method for seeing most of what will be in focus. Both, in tandem, work pretty well in my opinion.


MCSquared Photography (external link) on WWW
MCSquared Photography (external link) on Flickr
MCSquared Photography (external link) on IG
My name: Manish.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,946 views & 1 like for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
(EOS R) Can I focus -while- holding the Depth-of-Field Preview Button?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1705 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.