Canon Announces Development of the EOS R5

This article from a few days ago sums up everything we know so far.

https://www.techradar.​com …the-new-mirrorless-marvel

umphotography wrote in post #19021393
Big news

EOS R5 will have 2 slots

1 will be SD and 1 will be CF express..video at 5 minute mark from Fro know photos

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=K4oD383io-0

This tells me it will definitely be quicker than a 5D4

CF express works very well

Sure, it will be faster, IF this rumor pans out. One can be optimistic about developments.

Just 8K video alone will require faster file transfers, much higher resolution needs and file sizes... Between the resolution we know it has to have minimally, and the framerates already stated, the file management needs are greatly increased with this camera.

sapearl wrote in post #19021405
Sure, it will be faster, IF this rumor pans out. One can be optimistic about developments.

Listen to what he said

CF express and an SD card


OOOOPPS MY BAD. He did say canon rumors

All we have from Canon officially is the original announcement linked in the first post. Canon hasn't announced ANYTHING else yet about the R5, so we are working with rumors and educated/logical conclusions.

TeamSpeed wrote in post #19021407
Just 8K video alone will require faster file transfers, much higher resolution needs and file sizes... Between the resolution we know it has to have minimally, and the framerates already stated, the file management needs are greatly increased with this camera.

The R5 will have to use a different codec than the 5D4 for video. My guess with HEIF image suppport, H.265 for UHD (which is now a standard HEVC video format).

It is true that if what Canon leaked is accurate, this has to be MUCH faster than 5D4 for processing images, with 20FPS for stills, and 8K video, these specs require a higher MP count and much faster throughput.

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #19021524
It is true that if what Canon leaked is accurate, this has to be MUCH faster than 5D4 for processing images, with 20FPS for stills, and 8K video, these specs require a higher MP count and much faster throughput.

All-I 8K at 30fps could have a lot of usefulness. That's basically like 30 medium-quality JPEGs per second. You could use 1/60 if you want to do video, or do 1/400 or faster shutter speeds to use it as a JPEG source.

What I've noticed is that new TVs are using AI to smooth out low frame rates and jerky video, promoting it all to 120 fps. This could mean that one could stick with faster shutter speeds for video, and just have this type of AI smooth it out, and then all the individual frames are worthy stills.

John Sheehy wrote in post #19021580
All-I 8K at 30fps could have a lot of usefulness. That's basically like 30 medium-quality JPEGs per second. You could use 1/60 if you want to do video, or do 1/400 or faster shutter speeds to use it as a JPEG source.

What I've noticed is that new TVs are using AI to smooth out low frame rates and jerky video, promoting it all to 120 fps. This could mean that one could stick with faster shutter speeds for video, and just have this type of AI smooth it out, and then all the individual frames are worthy stills.

Agreed, and at 8K "medium quality" is definitely subjective! Compared to my first and second third and fourth generation 1D pro bodies, these still grabs from video will have more than double the resolution!

It's higher res than a still from Canon's current top of the line pro 1DXIII !

From Peter McKinnon
https://youtu.be/Bn7DX​kNKWBM
Fair warning, it's mostly clickbait

trekgod3 wrote in post #19023780
From Peter McKinnon
https://youtu.be/Bn7DX​kNKWBM
Fair warning, it's mostly clickbait

That was 4 minutes and 47 seconds of my life I'll never get back. You were right about the click bait.....total waste of time. I'll save you all the trouble: he holds a "camera" at the beginning for a few seconds and then runs around Canon HQ burning tape.

trekgod3 wrote in post #19023780
From Peter McKinnon
https://youtu.be/Bn7DX​kNKWBM
Fair warning, it's mostly clickbait

Junk video.

trekgod3 wrote in post #19023780
From Peter McKinnon
https://youtu.be/Bn7DX​kNKWBM
Fair warning, it's mostly clickbait

That made me decide Peter McKinnon is a bad man, and I don't like him.

trekgod3 wrote in post #19023780
From Peter McKinnon
https://youtu.be/Bn7DX​kNKWBM
Fair warning, it's mostly clickbait

So Trek, did you look at this whole video - perhaps I missed something of actual value? Or is the only purpose to boost his site?

sapearl wrote in post #19024089
So Trek, did you look at this whole video - perhaps I missed something of actual value? Or is the only purpose to boost his site?

and his Ego. What a dummy post