Hosaltezza wrote in post #19022402
Thanks for the info the RF 50 is amazing I’ve tried it . But I’m not a professional photographer. I do shoot some party’s and a couple of families a year. But that price for the RF50 and the size is crazy .
I am not a pro photographer either, but I am definitely a 50 mm shooter. Basically, because I did buy a plethora of lenses over time, I just exchanged a bunch to get the RF 50L and the RF 85L, replacing amongst others my EF 50 F/1.2L and my EF 85L II.
The latter is a no-brainer, as it has better OOF transitions both in background and foreground, as is crazy sharp from F/1.2, vs F/2 with the EF version, and a very similar rendition otherwise. The 50L not so necessarily, as the character of the EF F/1.2L is different to the RF 50L. As mentioned, the RF 50L is really extremely good, but I guess I could have lived with the EF 50 F/1.2L as well. Actually, I am considering buyng one again, as an addition to the RF 50L
. You do need to make sure it works well, however: I had mine recalibrated by Canon with very specific instructions: it had some back-focus until F/2.8 (used to be a common problem in the early years), but with my instructions they managed to get it 100% at all f-stops. No idea if since then the AF-algorithms have been adapted to make it work 100% straight out of the box, however.
HTH, kind regards, Wim