……………...The hardest part of the judging was the long break between the end of judging and the program. Over cookies the members would ask about the images that were less successful. Sometimes it's hard to say anything encouraging about an image to an earnest and enthusiastic photographer who has no discernible talent. You just have be encouraging and point them to resources. That why I like participating here, you can help break down an image and help someone in a methodical way that you can't in that setting.
I agree gonzo, that can be quite challenging. You want to be honest, encouraging and not crush any creative spirit. This is why so often it's difficult to find really qualified and helpful judges. It's easy to comment on a well done photo but a different story when the image needs work.
When I'm faced with those situations I try to understand where the photographer is coming from and build a helpful critique from that direction. I believe that every image I've ever seen has at least one or more strong elements that you can build upon in your comments. Perhaps it's a great idea that was poorly executed. Or maybe it's a solid composition but the photographer's technical skills are lacking. Start with the good aspects of an image and then tell the person what they can do to make it better. Do this in a kind and understanding way and you can never go wrong.
I have a friend - quite a talented photographer, but a bit harsh in his social skills at times - who no longer gets invited back to certain clubs. It's not very helpful during a critique session when your first comment is "This image does nothing for me."
