Canon seems to have done a lot better with the EF-M series cameras than lenses. They have had more bodies than lenses. Sort of makes me wonder why they don't support the EF-M mount lenses better.
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" 57,710 posts Likes: 4032 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Mar 14, 2020 18:17 | #31 Canon seems to have done a lot better with the EF-M series cameras than lenses. They have had more bodies than lenses. Sort of makes me wonder why they don't support the EF-M mount lenses better. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 18, 2020 12:43 | #32 “Different strokes for different folks”
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 636 guests, 144 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||