Not clear skies in OC, lots of haze but at least no clouds. But it still showed very nicely, better than I expected.
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2iLPjZBApr 04, 2020 04:25 | #16 Not clear skies in OC, lots of haze but at least no clouds. But it still showed very nicely, better than I expected. IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2iLPjZB
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 04, 2020 08:51 | #17 SiriusDoggy wrote in post #19040097 Another single image after dark. I'm hoping to do some stacking tomorrow after a bit of sleep. Curious to see if I can pull out any of the blue nebula around the brighter stars. Probably not considering my light pollution and 1st quarter moon. ![]() There are a few on spaceweather gallery that shows neb with Venus . Maybe you can stack and bring some out .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,511 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Apr 04, 2020 09:56 | #18 I have a question. Venus is sunward of Earth. The only time it should be fully "full" (as in the full moon) is when the sun is nearly between Earth and Venus. One of the shots in this thread shows a crescent. In the others, clearly taken at night, Venus is a full sphere. Can someone explain this? Lack of magnification? Overexposure bloom? Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Celestron Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 3 years ago by Celestron. | Apr 04, 2020 13:25 | #19 joedlh wrote in post #19040291 I have a question. Venus is sunward of Earth. The only time it should be fully "full" (as in the full moon) is when the sun is nearly between Earth and Venus. One of the shots in this thread shows a crescent. In the others, clearly taken at night, Venus is a full sphere. Can someone explain this? Lack of magnification? Overexposure bloom? In the images above Venus seems to be in a Full phase but actually it isn't . Venus and Mercury will show the same effect unless you have a powerful enough camera lens or telescope to reach out and seperate the glow from the planet which then will show the pase that they are in . When they rotate behind the Sun the Suns glow blocks both planets until it appears far away enough from the glow on the opposite side .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 04, 2020 15:54 | #20 joedlh wrote in post #19040291 I have a question. Venus is sunward of Earth. The only time it should be fully "full" (as in the full moon) is when the sun is nearly between Earth and Venus. One of the shots in this thread shows a crescent. In the others, clearly taken at night, Venus is a full sphere. Can someone explain this? Lack of magnification? Overexposure bloom? Yes, lack of magnification and overexposure is the reason. Greg M.~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nardes Goldmember More info | Apr 05, 2020 05:13 | #21 Here is this most beautiful conjunction from the evening of 5th April, with Venus having moved further along the ecliptic.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nardes Goldmember More info | Apr 05, 2020 17:45 | #22 I just finished processing this one which was taken with the 300mm telephoto + x1.4 Extender, to give a focal length of 420mm. Image hosted by forum (1037080) © nardes [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2020 17:21 | #23 Here's my stacking attempt. It's a stack of 15 exposures. I was hoping to bring out some of the blue nebulosity around the stars but I think the Vegas light-pollution and 1st quarter moon were working against me. Plus my DSO stacking/processing skills aren't that great. Greg M.~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2020 19:30 | #24 How long was your exposures SD ? To really capture the neb from M45 exposures need be 3-5 mins each and about 30-50 exposures . I did 2-5 mins for 10 exposures couple yrs ago and i barely brought out any neb and i had a clear night no moon .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2020 20:49 | #25 Celestron wrote in post #19042486 How long was your exposures SD ? To really capture the neb from M45 exposures need be 3-5 mins each and about 30-50 exposures . I did 2-5 mins for 10 exposures couple yrs ago and i barely brought out any neb and i had a clear night no moon . Well, then I didn't have near enough data then. My longest exposure was only 20 seconds and I only had 15 total. Greg M.~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2020 08:59 | #26 SiriusDoggy wrote in post #19042515 Well, then I didn't have near enough data then. My longest exposure was only 20 seconds and I only had 15 total. Any longer than 20 seconds at my ISO settings though and the sky started to blow out. Like I said, I'm shooting right over the Vegas skyline to my west and there was a 1st quarter moon too. I'm still happy with my results. I understand , where i live when i first begin imaging back with film in 02’ my skies had a bortle sky of 4.5-5.5 which for city was very good . Now LP has tripled plus a neighbor behind me has a big LED night light that has destroyed my viewing and now bortle is Class 6 being 2.36 .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1401 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||