Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Apr 2020 (Sunday) 06:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Nothing in focus - Canon 6D or Canon 24-70 f4L - which is to blame?

 
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 3 years ago by Choderboy. (3 edits in all)
     
Apr 13, 2020 21:45 |  #16

When you say 100% crops, is this what you are talking about?
ie the light gray area was the complete image and you cropped out just the centre part of the image? Did you crop from the centre?

For the 2nd pair of images you posted, ISO 100 was not a good choice.

2nd image:
Canon EOS 6D • Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM @70mm • 1/250 • f/7.1 • ISO 100

Go to at least ISO 400. Then your shutter speed would have been 1/1000 sec for same exposure.
Use f5.6 and it would have been 1/1600 sec. With IS OFF, 1/1600 sec you can be confident there is no blur cause by camera movement.

6D has such good high ISO, use ISO800 for 1/3200 sec.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/04/2/LQ_1038767.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1038767) © Choderboy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 3 years ago by Choderboy.
     
Apr 13, 2020 22:01 |  #17

This is a 'quick and dirty' test using my EF 85 1.8 lens.
First the full uncropped image, then a crop of the same image.
This was just as a demo for another thread. I know the lens is good and does not require MFA.
Just hand held but I used 1/4000 sec shutter speed so only really bad technique would cause any problems due to movement.
I focused on the bar code. The ruler helps to show where the sharpest point is.
So I can see lens is sharp. I can also see where the sharpest point is.
As I was standing, shooting down at an angle, the '22' is just slightly closer to the camera than the barcode.
For a perfect set up, I would have placed something under the ruler so it was the same height as the barcode.
The tiles also provide the ability to see sharpest point but ruler is easier.
I shot at f2. This makes the Depth Of Field smaller so easier to judge where the sharpest point (or plane of focus) is.

Less than 2 minutes to set up and take test shots. A few more minutes on PC.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/03/4/LQ_1034278.jpg
Photo from Choderboy's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1034278)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/03/4/LQ_1034279.jpg
Photo from Choderboy's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1034279)

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,469 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4570
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 3 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 13, 2020 22:40 |  #18

steve18 wrote:
Wilt - Just did 2 shots with LV, manual focus and auto, see below.
Image looks sharp in the viewfinder so I guess it's not a focus screen problem.


  1. The fact that the Live View shot was sharp is fundamental proof of the quality of the image delivered by the lens to the sensor.
  2. The fact that the viewfinder view (after Live View AF) looks sharp proves there is not an issue with the main reflex mirror position or the focus screen seated position.



If you have AF focus issues in spite of the above facts, that points to

  • supplmental mirror (on back of reflex mirror) not being in proper position, or
  • AF sensor in the base of the body not being in proper position

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steve18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Post edited over 3 years ago by steve18.
     
Apr 14, 2020 03:38 |  #19

Choderboy - The crops are 1280x1280 as requested by this forum. Also, I didn't want any sharpening added by this site which it would add if I'd uploaded the full size image.

Point taken on iso/shutter speed and thanks for the test info.


Wilt - Would you consider the first 2 pics I posted (Live view) sharp? If this is the best the 24-70 can produce I'm returning it today. The 70-200 shots are ok for focus and better than the 24-70 so it's unlikely the 6D is faulty?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 14, 2020 04:42 as a reply to  @ steve18's post |  #20

Please answer these two questions:

1/ When you say 100% crops, is this what you are talking about?
ie the light gray area was the complete image and you cropped out just the centre part of the image?

2/ Did you crop from the centre?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/04/2/LQ_1038806.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1038806) © Choderboy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steve18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Apr 14, 2020 05:17 |  #21

I don't know why there's a light grey area around the image, my original upload filled that space. I cropped from the centre of the image.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 14, 2020 05:27 as a reply to  @ steve18's post |  #22

OK, try this.

Would you be happy with this image? Sharp enough?
(It's 1600 pixels wide as that is the maximum you can upload to POTN without resizing.)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/04/2/LQ_1038811.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1038811) © Choderboy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steve18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Apr 14, 2020 05:36 as a reply to  @ Choderboy's post |  #23

I'd be very happy with that. Just noticed 1600px!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 14, 2020 05:41 |  #24

OK.

First, here is the uncropped original, resized to 1280 pixels wide.
Second, a 100% crop, which does not look very good at all.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/04/2/LQ_1038813.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1038813) © Choderboy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/04/2/LQ_1038814.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1038814) © Choderboy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 14, 2020 05:51 |  #25

So, there is a massive difference between 100% crop and what you are posting.

I suggest best method is just resize the complete image to 1600 pixels (by 1200 pixels).
That should be described as "resized only" or "uncropped, resized only".

Notice also that you have options regarding sharpening on upload:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2020/04/2/LQ_1038816.jpg
Image hosted by forum (1038816) © Choderboy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,519 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 14, 2020 05:57 |  #26

Check my examples with the Coke box and ruler.
Complete, resized only image then a crop.
This allows anyone to clearly understand what they are looking at.

The crop allows a closer look at the target (the bar code) and the ruler markings to easily judge the point of focus.

I suggest replicating my Coke box test. Try the 24-70 at 70mm and the 70-200 at 70mm. A much better way to compare the two lenses to start.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Apr 14, 2020 09:53 |  #27

The easiest way to answer all these questions might be to upload a RAW file to Dropbox or some other file-sharing service and post the link here so that we can examine the original files ourselves.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,469 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4570
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 14, 2020 12:31 |  #28

steve18 wrote in post #19046180 (external link)
Choderboy - The crops are 1280x1280 as requested by this forum. Also, I didn't want any sharpening added by this site which it would add if I'd uploaded the full size image.

Point taken on iso/shutter speed and thanks for the test info.


Wilt - Would you consider the first 2 pics I posted (Live view) sharp? If this is the best the 24-70 can produce I'm returning it today. The 70-200 shots are ok for focus and better than the 24-70 so it's unlikely the 6D is faulty?

Having some difficulty knowing for certain, the first two pics in WHAT POST#?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steve18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Post edited over 3 years ago by steve18.
     
Apr 15, 2020 07:10 |  #29

Quick note to say I've returned the lens as there was a 14 day returns policy so I didn't have time to continue with the tests.
I will be hanging around the forums so I'll probably be back with another problem!

Thanks for the advice and help, it's really appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,469 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4570
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 15, 2020 16:18 as a reply to  @ steve18's post |  #30

Those two links in first post of this thread don't work...

Google
404. That’s an error.

The requested URL was not found on this server. That’s all we know.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,599 views & 11 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
Nothing in focus - Canon 6D or Canon 24-70 f4L - which is to blame?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1825 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.