Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 18 Apr 2020 (Saturday) 17:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Anyone with feedback on Gitzo GT3543XLS

 
downhillonwater
Senior Member
Avatar
320 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1048
Joined Feb 2020
Location: Gurnee, IL USA
     
Apr 18, 2020 17:46 |  #1

I'm a tall guy so this looks like a high quality option under $1000. Anyone have any experience / review of these tripod legs? Thanks!


Flickr https://www.flickr.com​/photos/downhillonwate​r/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 22, 2020 23:59 |  #2

I've got the GT3533LS, I'm 6' even, and that "long" is tall enough for me without question,. but still 20" shorter than the one your looking at!

They are great high quality legs, can't go wrong with Gitzo. The advantage you'd get with those ultra tall legs is more flexibility on very uneven ground, comfortably shooting up hill or in the sky etc,.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
downhillonwater
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
320 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1048
Joined Feb 2020
Location: Gurnee, IL USA
     
Apr 24, 2020 10:33 |  #3

Thanks for the reply. I'm 6'4". Your feedback on the LS version is good news. Do these things ever go on sale?


Flickr https://www.flickr.com​/photos/downhillonwate​r/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,255 posts
Likes: 1525
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited over 3 years ago by John from PA.
     
Apr 26, 2020 16:33 |  #4

downhillonwater wrote in post #19052188 (external link)
Thanks for the reply. I'm 6'4". Your feedback on the LS version is good news. Do these things ever go on sale?

Supposedly a sale at Adorama for $900 but on back order. But if that price is a deal, order and they will hold the price.

See https://www.adorama.co​m/gzgt3543xlsu.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 3 years ago by Wilt.
     
Apr 27, 2020 00:59 |  #5

A key consideration to think about...3-section (3533) vs. 4-section legs (3543)
You can get higher with 4 sections, but understand that you have to extend 3 sections and lock 3 locks EVERY TIME you set up or take down your tripod at max length for a 4-section tripod (vs. extend 2 sections and lock 2 locks every time you set at max length for a 3 section tripod. IOW the setup and takedown work for the shooter is 50% greater for 4-section vs. 3-section legs in each direction.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 3 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Apr 28, 2020 13:55 |  #6

I have mostly stuck with three sections. The only advantage for 4 sections is often they fold up a little shorter, but sometimes the difference is next to nothing.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dangermoney
Goldmember
1,606 posts
Likes: 7305
Joined Mar 2019
Location: Recalculating...
     
May 04, 2020 19:51 |  #7

downhillonwater wrote in post #19052188 (external link)
Thanks for the reply. I'm 6'4". Your feedback on the LS version is good news. Do these things ever go on sale?

This doesn't include the model you want but several models are on sale now:

https://www.cpricewatc​h.com …ler-carbon-fiber-tripods/ (external link)


FS: Canon G1X Version 1 with B+W filters
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1529660

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,515 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6391
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 3 years ago by Choderboy. (6 edits in all)
     
May 05, 2020 17:57 |  #8

Wilt wrote in post #19053539 (external link)
A key consideration to think about...3-section (3533) vs. 4-section legs (3543)
You can get higher with 4 sections, but understand that you have to extend 3 sections and lock 3 locks EVERY TIME you set up or take down your tripod at max length for a 4-section tripod (vs. extend 2 sections and lock 2 locks every time you set at max length for a 3 section tripod. IOW the setup and takedown work for the shooter is 50% greater for 4-section vs. 3-section legs in each direction.


You don't have to extend all 3 sections and use all 3 locks EVERYTIME. I used to think that you do, but I was wrong.
There is absolutely no reason not to just use 2 locks most of the time when using a 4 section tripod.

For storing at home, transit to location, be it walking, driving, Air travel, using all 3 locks and having tripod at minimum length would be typical, but not mandatory. I have a station wagon. I often throw my 3 section Gitzo in the back of the car with tripod a bit shorter than typical shooting length. Why not? I walk with tripod like that, camera and lens mounted with tripod on my shoulder.
So tripod gets driven to location at shooting length, then carried at same length to various locations if flat ground, or with 1 set of legs slightly retracted on uneven ground. For quick shots I usually just stand a little stooped, for longer periods I use 1 set of locks to extend to more comfortable shooting length. 4 section tripod would only require 1 set of locks to be used in same scenario. I don't believe that is an unusual use scenario. The most common reason I retract legs is in rough terrain where extended legs are a nuisance.
Sometimes I adjust length, shooting at a high angle or shooting from lower to the ground. High angle requires 1 set of locks to be adjusted, same if I was using a 4 section. For low shooting, the 4 section may well need an extra set of locks to be used.

If I was travelling in other than my car, I would probably retract legs and 4 sections would take longer. Still, once at location, there would be some cases where 4 sections require more locks to be used, but not all. Without low level shooting and no rough terrain, I could shoot all day with only adjusting 1 set of locks.

Now, this one will really get your head spinning. I use tripod bags as camera bags! Can you believe it?
Manfrotto MBAG80P is very convenient to carry camera and long lens such as a typical 150-600.
My big Manfrotto ProBag 1 tripod bag is great for 1DXII and Sigma 500 f4.

I don't think I'm 'thinking outside the box' in using tripod bags as camera bags or storing tripod in my car with legs extended.
To me it's just common sense.

For the OP, above is just a moot point. If you want a tall Gitzo, you have to buy a 4 section.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,515 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6391
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 05, 2020 19:14 |  #9

If you want tall Gitzo, 4 or 6 sections are the only options and it's 3 Series or 5 Series, no tall 4 Series.

Gitzo Systematic
---------------
3 Section:
GT3533S Maximum Height 130 cm
GT3533LS Maximum Height 152 cm
GT4533LS Maximum Height 156 cm
GT5533S Maximum Height 134 cm
GT5533LS Maximum Height 145 cm
---------------
4 Section:
GT3543LS Maximum Height 146 cm
GT3543XLS Maximum Height 202 cm
GT4543LS Maximum Height 158 cm
GT5543LS Maximum Height 156 cm
GT5543XLS Maximum Height 198 cm
---------------
5 Section
GT4553S Maximum Height 136 cm
---------------
6 Section
GT5563GS Maximum Height 278 cm


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 05, 2020 19:18 as a reply to  @ Choderboy's post |  #10

Yikes, 6 sections! :eek:


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,515 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6391
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 05, 2020 19:24 |  #11

Wilt wrote in post #19058379 (external link)
Yikes, 6 sections! :eek:

278cm (over 9 feet tall). I'd need 3 milk crates to stand on to use it at maximum height and even then I'd have to be shooting angled up.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 05, 2020 19:25 as a reply to  @ Choderboy's post |  #12

Agree with you, Choderboy. To me, 'moving between shooting positions' is not 'takedown'. Like you, I shorten from my shooting length to walk to another shooting position (and sometimes that is not that 'nearby' to where I was last). And car travel does not necessitate 'takedown' either.

For for someone tall who insists upon shooting at eye level for all shots, the 4-section leg does require 3 extended sections and 3 locks from its most compact position. Some folks neglect to consider if that is too arduous or time consuming to THEM...why I raised the point for consideration.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SailingAway
Senior Member
497 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 137
Joined Sep 2013
     
May 06, 2020 00:35 |  #13

From another perspective (pun intended), so often we choose the most convenient height for shooting. That’s a pretty drastic limitation on our compositional choices.

Me too, but sometimes my ground-level pod comes out. Other times it’s my classic Manfrotto tall sticks (external link), max 8.75’ / 267cm.

Low angle and high angle shots - way beyond the ordinary. And yes, must bring the stepladder to work the high shots. More choices in composition.


From the upper left corner of the U.S.
Photos, Video & Pano r us.
College and workshop instructor in video and audio.
70D, Sigma 8mm, Tokina f2.8 11-16, Canon EF-S f2.8 17-55, Sigma f2.8 50-150 EX OS, Tamron 150-600VC. Gigapan Epic Pro, Nodal Ninja 5 & R10.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dangermoney
Goldmember
1,606 posts
Likes: 7305
Joined Mar 2019
Location: Recalculating...
     
May 06, 2020 14:23 |  #14

Choderboy wrote in post #19058349 (external link)
You don't have to extend all 3 sections and use all 3 locks EVERYTIME. I used to think that you do, but I was wrong.
There is absolutely no reason not to just use 2 locks most of the time when using a 4 section tripod.

For storing at home, transit to location, be it walking, driving, Air travel, using all 3 locks and having tripod at minimum length would be typical, but not mandatory. I have a station wagon. I often throw my 3 section Gitzo in the back of the car with tripod a bit shorter than typical shooting length. Why not? I walk with tripod like that, camera and lens mounted with tripod on my shoulder.
So tripod gets driven to location at shooting length, then carried at same length to various locations if flat ground, or with 1 set of legs slightly retracted on uneven ground. For quick shots I usually just stand a little stooped, for longer periods I use 1 set of locks to extend to more comfortable shooting length. 4 section tripod would only require 1 set of locks to be used in same scenario. I don't believe that is an unusual use scenario. The most common reason I retract legs is in rough terrain where extended legs are a nuisance.
Sometimes I adjust length, shooting at a high angle or shooting from lower to the ground. High angle requires 1 set of locks to be adjusted, same if I was using a 4 section. For low shooting, the 4 section may well need an extra set of locks to be used.


That's how I use my GT3543XLS.


FS: Canon G1X Version 1 with B+W filters
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1529660

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 3 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
May 09, 2020 15:20 |  #15

Likewise with the locks. I only have one four section tripod and often I don;t use the lowest smallest diameter locks.

With my 5 section mono pod, (4 locks) I don't think I have ever used all the locks. That said, I also do not fold in the lowest section in all the way. I leave it sticking out about 5-6 inches or so. It is my beech going support 95% of the time, and gets stuck in gritty salty sand an salt water. I don't always take the time to clean it off when i get home, but by leaving the part that gets stuck in the salt and sand extended 6" I am not migrating the issue uphill. :) My only maintenance concern is the male and female sides of the threaded foot.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,368 views & 7 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Anyone with feedback on Gitzo GT3543XLS
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1254 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.