I have no idea how good or bad this photo is- I'd like critique on it, more from framing than post processing, of which I don't do much.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
May 26, 2020 17:24 | #1 I have no idea how good or bad this photo is- I'd like critique on it, more from framing than post processing, of which I don't do much. Image hosted by forum (1046859) © Teton [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rrblint Listen! .... do you smell something? More info | May 26, 2020 22:03 | #2 I like it! What should you do to make better? If you want to do some post work on it, try cropping it into a pano by cropping off about 2/3s of the grass in the foreground and 1/3 of the sky. This will bring the cattle closer to the viewer and IMHO improve the photo. Also you have a very dirty sensor. Clone out the spots in the sky and clean your sensor. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dasmith232 Senior Member More info | May 26, 2020 23:53 | #3 Before I saw Mark's response, I was thinking nearly the exact same thing: vertical cropping and sensor dust Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tuttifrutti Senior Member More info | May 27, 2020 03:25 | #4 Exactly the same as the other 2 posters. This screams pano to me. That would put more emphasis on the interesting parts (the cattle and the mountains) Hello...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | May 27, 2020 10:54 | #5 Agree with the above comments. It needs to be trimmed down, the sky is adding little to the image, and it seems to be lacking a subject. Even landscapes need a subject.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 31, 2020 12:30 | #6 rrblint wrote in post #19069612 I like it! What should you do to make better? If you want to do some post work on it, try cropping it into a pano by cropping off about 2/3s of the grass in the foreground and 1/3 of the sky. This will bring the cattle closer to the viewer and IMHO improve the photo. Also you have a very dirty sensor. Clone out the spots in the sky and clean your sensor. Exactly what I was thinking as soon as I saw the photo. That would give you a technically "correct" photo, but I would use that as your starting point. Sometimes correct is boring. With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoeThibodeau Member 51 posts Likes: 59 Joined Sep 2019 More info | Jun 02, 2020 17:10 | #7 Honor where the detail lands in a frame. This is a panoramic because all the subject detail is in the middle in a panoramic format. Let the content guide you. Empty space such as sky or grass does not deliver detail to the eye. This is what the viewer is looking for in a landscape. The rest of the image is lovely. Well done. Will make a nice panoramic print to hang. And I think B/W is a nice choice. Joe Thibodeau
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2020 11:42 | #8 I agree with other posters that this photo is a great start, but could benefit a lot from cropping. I'd crop it vertically to a bit right of the white cattle, just cutting out the silver silos. That gives you the white cattle looking into the frame from the right, and balanced by the black one that has more visual weight because it seems to be looking at the camera. It also gets rid of the distracting white building. I'd crop off a bunch of the grass because it doesn't seem to add much and the shadow on the low left is distracting. I like it with a lot of sky to give a feeling of big open never ending landscape, but that is a matter of personal preference and what 'story' you want to tell with the image. I like the B&W for this photo and your processing. Fuji XT-3, 18-55 F2-4, 10-24mm, 100-400mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | Jun 05, 2020 12:35 | #9 You are not close enough to cows. And dust on the sensor is visible. M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | Jun 24, 2020 12:03 | #10 Teton.... based on all this info.... did you do any rethinking on this image? Would be interested where you took it.. or were you happy with what you had, which is fine too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail
LOG IN TO REPLY |
If it would be possible to get closerto your foreground cows it would help eliminate some of that pasture at the bottom but also accentuate the distance scale since you have cowsdispersed over the depth. I would like to see more. Nice work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndyMacD Hatchling 8 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Scotland More info | Dec 05, 2020 07:42 | #13 Fred, as a rule of thumb with landscapes try to identify what it is you like about a view. The trick then is to guide the viewer to feel the same way as you did, so think about how to to direct the viewer. If you are clear on what your subject is, ensure that takes up a lot of the frame. Everything else is then how you move around to find elements that draw the eye to the subject - if they don’t draw the eye to the subject or add to the narrative about the subject, try not to include them. So I this shot, you wanted a farm against the rockies. I didn’t see the farm at first at all! You could get closer to the farm buildings by using a long zoom to make the farm take up more space in the shot, compress distance using the zoom so the rockies are big and towering over the farm. The grass adds little and would be best left out I’d the image, and the same with the sky. The cows distract but could be context, maybe a tighter crop could have 1 or2 cows for context, rather than the whole field for the eye to get lost in. You’ve done the technical photography well, it’s just down to composing with purpose now to ge great result. AndyMacD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
camerabug Member 41 posts Likes: 155 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Originally Toronto, Ontario but now residing in Connecticut More info Post edited over 2 years ago by camerabug. | Jan 15, 2021 13:24 | #14 I really like this image and how it is processed. I'm one that generally tries to avoid centered images. I realize the sky is also cloudless in the upper part of the frame, but in my opinion, the amount of grass in the foreground seems to move the eye more to the bottom of the frame. It would be more dynamic if some of that was removed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1338 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||