Canon RF 100-500 4.5 - 7.1

Apparently dealers are getting sku numbers.

https://www.canonrumor​s.com …-sku-and-kit-information/

MatthewK wrote in post #19076524
:p

Yes sir, we have the R + RF 35 f/1.8, RF 24-70, RF 70-200, and my EF 50L. My wife has mostly commandeered that kit for her product/lifestyle marketing photography, and I shoot my Fuji for puttering around the house, but when it's time to get the polished shot, the Canon always gets the nod. It's almost effortless using the R, the results from this kit are phenomenal.

OH! I thought you made the switch to Nikon.

gossamer88 wrote in post #19076531
OH! I thought you made the switch to Nikon.

I'm a 3-brand shooter these days, each has something to offer. Nikon for birding, Fuji for light-weight casual fun, Canon for exacting IQ. Love them all equally

MatthewK wrote in post #19076516
I tried to tier them as such that if you were getting more reach w/ TCs, the next lens up would be just a little bit faster that it would make you think "if I'm shooting w/ the TC all of the time, I might as well step up to the next, more expensive lens" Devious, but smart, because you want people to be split on which to buy, and hopefully end up getting both.

Everyone has a limit on how much they are willing to spend, or what they are willing to physically tote around. I don't even like walking around all day with the medium-weight 400/4DO II; otherwise, I'd be using an 800/5.6 or 600/4.

John Sheehy wrote in post #19076860
Everyone has a limit on how much they are willing to spend, or what they are willing to physically tote around. I don't even like walking around all day with the medium-weight 400/4DO II; otherwise, I'd be using an 800/5.6 or 600/4.

Same here, that's why I went to Nikon 500PF for my birding.