Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 02 Jun 2020 (Tuesday) 19:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A Weird One

 
Leon ­ Purvis
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2020
Location: Gastonia USA
     
Jun 02, 2020 19:27 |  #1

Excuse me if this has been asked before, but my search has not produced an answer.

At a wedding that I photographed well over twenty years ago, a woman in the wedding party wore some sort of makeup that made her face appear as though she wore a mask. It was weird. I noticed nothing different about her appearance before, during, or after the ceremony or the reception, but by golly, when I got the proofs back (these were the film days), her face looked as if she had worn some kind of luminescent foundation. I asked the B&G if the woman had a skin disorder that warranted special makeup, but they said no. They just laughed it off and said that she was weird.

Has anyone come across anything like this?

I would include a photo, but that portfolio is in storage.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,768 posts
Likes: 1250
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 02, 2020 19:49 |  #2

I had encountered something like and I think it is in the make-up that the person was wearing. I was using a flash and everyone looked great except for that one lady.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,128 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 887
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Jun 02, 2020 21:29 |  #3

I like the idea of the makeup... something with a glitter content to it. Only showed up in amplified light? Maybe?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Leon ­ Purvis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2020
Location: Gastonia USA
     
Jun 03, 2020 23:34 |  #4

I wish I could find the photo. All of that photography is packed away.

If I remember correctly, the woman actually appeared in two photos: one in the formals inside the church and in an informal group outside. The woman's appearance was the same, so the makeup must have reacted to the light of the flash (I used a fill outdoors),

I've never seen anything like it since.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 07, 2020 20:56 |  #5

From memory this happens when makeup has titanium dioxide in it. Not many do these days. Interestingly this is a key ingredient in paint (external link).


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,420 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4508
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 09, 2020 00:53 |  #6

If the makeup has something which fluorescesce in the presence of UV light, and the flash tube is not coated to filter out UV light output, that might account for what happened.
The same phenomenon affects articles of new clothing, when they have optical brighteners applied by the manufacturer of the material used to make the garment...some lighting comes with UV coated tubes, some with non-UV-coated tubes (Paul Buff gave the choice to the buyer), and pro photographers preferred the UV coated tubes.

Another explanation is that the lady might have a rather distorted view of herself in make-up. Decades ago, there was a 'grand dame' who was also my mother's good friend in a mother's guild associated with a university, and I always thought her makeup to be 'clownish' in its application. In her own eyes, she was probably 'not properly dressed' unless so masked.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Leon ­ Purvis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2020
Location: Gastonia USA
     
Jun 10, 2020 11:19 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #7

This happened 20+ years ago on film using the Vivitar 285 Cockroach (Yay, Al Jacobs). I don't think that the resulting effect was the result of the lighting. It must have been something in the makeup.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,768 posts
Likes: 1250
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 11, 2020 20:23 |  #8

My last instance of this happening was in 2012. The room was dark and I was shooting band members using speedlites. All the men looked good, but that one woman had something in her makeup that shined/reflected a lot. I suspect because the makeup has some sun blocking in it, but do not know for sure.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,574 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
A Weird One
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1328 guests, 111 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.