i-G12 wrote in post #19111610
No noticeable difference in detail or in the shadows?
So basically it’s a compressed RAW file?
ZIP files are compressed using technology that doesn't lose even a byte of the original file. JPGs are also compressed, but they are "lossy." If you saved an image as a bitmap (not lossy) and compared it with a jpg, you could find pixels that are different.
It's my understanding that RAW files are compressed, but they have not lost any information. C-RAW is a lossy format to make smaller files. Thus you do lose information using C-RAW. But, like comparing a jpg to a bmp, the difference will be very hard (if not impossible) to see. I've heard that if you do something like underexpose by 4 stops and then push it in post-processing, the C-RAW has noticeably worse noise than the original RAW would have under the same conditions.
Alas, though, I have no R5 yet, so I can't confirm any of this... 