Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Jul 2020 (Thursday) 08:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon EOS R5 Unite and Discuss!

 
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
Sep 13, 2020 20:12 |  #1201

Tap the shutter right before bringing up to eye like Ron says. Down in comments.
Don

Whistling Wings Photography

Quote:

I know what you mean about the delay in the EVF coming on. What I have learned to do is half-press the shutter button as I am bringing the camera up. By the time your eye gets to the viewfinder the EVF will be on and you can get on the birds just like you would with an OVF. It took me a couple of days to build the muscle memory to the the half-press on the way up and now I don't even think about it, I just do it naturally. That said I hope Canon can make this unnecessary in the future.

https://youtu.be/njEIJ​tpnsFg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LJ3Jim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,654 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3180
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Sep 13, 2020 20:24 |  #1202

Littlefield wrote in post #19124574 (external link)
Tap the shutter right before bringing up to eye like Ron says. Down in comments.
Don

Whistling Wings Photography

Quote:

I know what you mean about the delay in the EVF coming on. What I have learned to do is half-press the shutter button as I am bringing the camera up. By the time your eye gets to the viewfinder the EVF will be on and you can get on the birds just like you would with an OVF. It took me a couple of days to build the muscle memory to the the half-press on the way up and now I don't even think about it, I just do it naturally. That said I hope Canon can make this unnecessary in the future.

https://youtu.be/njEIJ​tpnsFg (external link)

I don't have my R5 yet (still backordered), but I do have the R6. I use the technique described by Don and Ron, and it works. My camera hangs at my side via a BlackRapid strap.


Image editing ok; C&C always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WilsonFlyer
Goldmember
1,252 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 874
Joined Mar 2011
     
Sep 13, 2020 20:36 |  #1203

LJ3Jim wrote in post #19124579 (external link)
I don't have my R5 yet (still backordered), but I do have the R6. I use the technique described by Don and Ron, and it works. My camera hangs at my side via a BlackRapid strap.

I don't have either one yet, but I also live and die by my Black Rapid straps. I could see this as such a natural movement with the BR, since that's basically what I do anyway with my R without even thinking about it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Sep 13, 2020 20:46 |  #1204

But it sounds like that really drains the battery rapidly so you need several batteries. That does not address the view finder issue with mechanical shutter where he mentioned the image freezes.


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,785 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16885
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 3 years ago by digital paradise. (4 edits in all)
     
Sep 13, 2020 21:30 |  #1205

Jeff USN Photog 72-76 wrote in post #19124569 (external link)
Will talks about it taking 2-5 seconds for the EVF to "boot" up. I tend to sit by a pond and have my camera on my lap most of the time and it can be 20 minutes between birds and then they pop up in front of me, 5 seconds and they would be gone.

has anyone noticed this? I will be testing it out next week when I rent one.

A few weeks ago I posted several scenarios around that in this thread including putting tape over the EVF. That was one idea but it will chew up batteries. Disabling the EF sensor and keeping it in EVF view and pressing the shutter/BBF before bringing it up to your eye. This includes adding max time to the auto power off so the camera never goes to sleep. The EVF shuts off after 6 seconds if there is nothing in front of it. The Display is not active either while you are waiting. The camera is not in sleep mode so when you press the BBF/shutter the EVF is awake by the time you get it to your eye. Also because the EVF sensor is disabled the Display does not wake up first followed by the switch from it to the EVF when you bring the camera up. I set my R up like and I'm testing it out. Even with the camera going to sleep it is still much faster opening directly to the EVF.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,785 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16885
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Post edited over 3 years ago by digital paradise. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 13, 2020 22:05 |  #1206

I should say that putting tape directly over the EVF sensor won't work. There has to be about an ⅛ inch space. I put a thin strip of tape the height of the EVF sensor and attached it to the outer edges of the eyecup. I've been thinking of making an eyecup adapter to throw on quickly. It would be fine for birds coming in every 20 seconds or so. Not good for 20 minutes. The disabling the EVF Sensor and pressing the BBF/Shutter before bringing the camera up would be better. You just need to get into the habit.

As for max power off settings the IS would run continually without the going to sleep. I don't think that will matter with RF lenses because of the tech. I wouldn't let it run for 20 minutes but I wouldn't care for 2-3 between shooting. On EF lenses pressing the Menu or Playback buttons will shut the IS off.

This is the only thing I miss about the OVF but there are easy work arounds.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,785 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16885
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Sep 13, 2020 22:27 |  #1207

I was shooting drag racing last Sunday with the EFV sensor disabled. The minimum power off time is 45 seconds. Again the EFV shuts off after 6 seconds without anything in front of it. I can verify that when I pressed the BBF/Shutter the EVF was completely awake if I did that before the camera went to sleep. I didn’t try it after it went to sleep but I will when I get a chance. It won’t be 2-5 seconds.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jared5
Senior Member
Avatar
560 posts
Likes: 527
Joined Aug 2016
Location: Seattle
     
Sep 13, 2020 22:27 |  #1208

umphotography wrote in post #19124573 (external link)
wildlife guys

3:45 through 6:00 as well as 9:00-11:00----Must listen closely

If you have ever been to Yellowstone and the Tetons....this is extremely disappointing news

Advantage definitely to DSLR.

Also wondering how its going to PU BIF's that quickly appear. A DSLR can get them if you perfect the skill sets. Sounds like this will be a bit of adjustment on the R5

I absolutely agree....some of the best shots you will ever get is when you surprise wildlife. Camera has got to perform here



Ever since the first time I shot the EOS R I did not like having the CAMERA choose for me whether the EVF or LCD would be active.

I set up the EOS R with a dedicated button to MANUALLY switch between EVF and LCD, this way it's always active when I need it and I don't have to worry about the annoying LCD screen turning on by itself in a dark setting.

With the EOS R5 I'm using a different button because of the slightly different configuration and I'm happy with that and don't have any issues when I need to quickly pull the camera up to my eye and take a picture. I wouldn't have it any other way!


EOS R3 | EOS R5 | EOS R | 5D Mk4
RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS | RF 28-70 f/2L | RF 24-70 f/2.8L IS | RF 15-35 f/2.8L IS
RF 135mm f/1.8L IS |RF 85mm f/1.2L | RF 85mm f/2 macro IS | RF 50mm f/1.2L | RF 50mm f/1.8 | RF 35mm f/1.8 macro IS | RF 24mm f/1.8 macro IS | RF 16mm f/2.8
https://www.youtube.co​m/JaredRibic/videos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,785 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16885
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Sep 13, 2020 22:38 |  #1209

Jared5 wrote in post #19124630 (external link)
Ever since the first time I shot the EOS R I did not like having the CAMERA choose for me whether the EVF or LCD would be active.

I set up the EOS R with a dedicated button to MANUALLY switch between EVF and LCD, this way it's always active when I need it and I don't have to worry about the annoying LCD screen turning on by itself in a dark setting.

With the EOS R5 I'm using a different button because of the slightly different configuration and I'm happy with that and don't have any issues when I need to quickly pull the camera up to my eye and take a picture. I wouldn't have it any other way!

Exactly.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tpatana
Senior Member
476 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Redmond, WA
     
Sep 13, 2020 23:17 |  #1210

Reading the manual as I don't have my camera yet. Maybe 20% through, it's crazy long. But I have few questions, maybe this is best place to ask?

If you set dual record (Raw+jpeg) and set NR, does the NR affect both or only jpeg? I don't like camera touching my raw files. Give me raw files raw, but I'm curious to compare since I've heard the in-camera NR is really good too.

Is ISO L (50) digital trick, is the pictures still shot at 100?

Min-shutter speed setting. In Auto-mode, does it take into account the lens? E.g. 200mm lens might go down to 1/200, and 14mm lens would go down to 1/10?

What the "highlight tone priority" actually does? Does is shift more data-bits to better cover the bright areas? I recall some earlier camera just underexposured slightly to make sure not blow out the whites. Is that same? Since it says it doesn't work on ISO100, makes me think it just drops ISO by one stop to preserve highlights. And I don't like camera using different settings than I'm giving it.

For flash ETTL balance, there's option ambiance priority. That sounds good one, I often do this manually when shooting with flash. Does it work as good as advertised?

Flash slow synchro. What is this setting?


As I keep reading more, I'm sure there's plenty more things I don't understand. Thanks for any help, hopefully I get my camera in few weeks.


Have: Many cameras with some Ls
Kendo.Photography (external link) / Kendo@Facebook (external link) / TeroPhotography.com (external link) / Tero@Facebook (external link) / CF card Speedtest on my gear (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,374 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1379
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
Post edited over 3 years ago by RDKirk. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 13, 2020 23:33 |  #1211

tpatana wrote in post #19124647 (external link)
Reading the manual as I don't have my camera yet. Maybe 20% through, it's crazy long. But I have few questions, maybe this is best place to ask?

If you set dual record (Raw+jpeg) and set NR, does the NR affect both or only jpeg? I don't like camera touching my raw files. Give me raw files raw, but I'm curious to compare since I've heard the in-camera NR is really good too.

The raw data itself is not effected. The metadata for the file records the camera settings, and these will be used by Canon DPP for the initial presentation of the RAW image for conversion to JPEG or TIFF.

Is ISO L (50) digital trick, is the pictures still shot at 100?

It's an in-camera gain reduction that does not improve image quality at all.

Min-shutter speed setting. In Auto-mode, does it take into account the lens? E.g. 200mm lens might go down to 1/200, and 14mm lens would go down to 1/10?

No. What you set is what you get.

If you're referring to the thumb rule of setting the shutter speed no lower than the f/stop, please understand that that's 1) Based on no more than a 10x enlargement and 2) Based on a given individual's actual ability to hand-hold a camera steady. IOW, it's serendipity if it works for you. You really have to find your own safe hand-holding speeds.

What the "highlight tone priority" actually does? Does is shift more data-bits to better cover the bright areas? I recall some earlier camera just underexposured slightly to make sure not blow out the whites. Is that same? Since it says it doesn't work on ISO100, makes me think it just drops ISO by one stop to preserve highlights. And I don't like camera using different settings than I'm giving it.


Highlight Tone Priority raises the "toe" of the tonal curve (gain in the shadows) by as much as a stop. The lowest ISO you can set is 200, so it's exposing the highlights as at ISO 200 and the shadows at ISO 100.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Sep 14, 2020 06:09 |  #1212

tpatana wrote in post #19124647 (external link)
Is ISO L (50) digital trick, is the pictures still shot at 100?

ISO 50 is no more a digital trick than all the other ISO settings are. It has less RAW headroom, but on the R5 it should be ample to simulate ISO 50 slide film.

On most Canons that have ISO 50, it uses the same gain as ISO 100, and ISO 200 with HTP enabled. It is anti-HTP, if you will, and the only reason not to have "anti-HTP" throughout the range is that Canon fears complaints about clipped highlights from people who expect the camera to behave more like negative film than slide film. For anyone using a camera in controlled light (without specular highlights that need to be recorded), with full manual exposure, "anti-HTP" would be very useful at all ISO levels, as a controlled, predictable kind of "exposure to the right".




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4211
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Sep 14, 2020 08:43 |  #1213

digital paradise wrote in post #19124608 (external link)
A few weeks ago I posted several scenarios around that in this thread including putting tape over the EVF. That was one idea but it will chew up batteries. Disabling the EF sensor and keeping it in EVF view and pressing the shutter/BBF before bringing it up to your eye. This includes adding max time to the auto power off so the camera never goes to sleep. The EVF shuts off after 6 seconds if there is nothing in front of it. The Display is not active either while you are waiting. The camera is not in sleep mode so when you press the BBF/shutter the EVF is awake by the time you get it to your eye. Also because the EVF sensor is disabled the Display does not wake up first followed by the switch from it to the EVF when you bring the camera up. I set my R up like and I'm testing it out. Even with the camera going to sleep it is still much faster opening directly to the EVF.


I would think this would all contribute to overheating as well. The camera is always on- hence the battery drain development. When I was at Grand Teton National park there was about 80 photographers, all in cars, circling the hot spots for moose, Elk, bears....many of us shooting out windows. A moose would walk across a small field and there were 20 cars parked on side of the roads....shooting out windows or guys hand holding 500's standing beside the cars.....no time to wait for a camera to wake up and be useful. There has to be a work around for this. All the focal points in the world are useless if the camera cant lock and track when you need it to


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4211
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Sep 14, 2020 08:46 |  #1214

Jared5 wrote in post #19124630 (external link)
Ever since the first time I shot the EOS R I did not like having the CAMERA choose for me whether the EVF or LCD would be active.

I set up the EOS R with a dedicated button to MANUALLY switch between EVF and LCD, this way it's always active when I need it and I don't have to worry about the annoying LCD screen turning on by itself in a dark setting.

With the EOS R5 I'm using a different button because of the slightly different configuration and I'm happy with that and don't have any issues when I need to quickly pull the camera up to my eye and take a picture. I wouldn't have it any other way!


Thanks

I knew someone would have a work around for this


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,374 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1379
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 14, 2020 09:04 |  #1215

umphotography wrote in post #19124787 (external link)
Thanks

I knew someone would have a work around for this

September 2018, Canon told us that at the 1:30 point in this video.

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=dtwKao_nuko (external link)


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

850,289 views & 4,917 likes for this thread, 236 members have posted to it and it is followed by 190 members.
Canon EOS R5 Unite and Discuss!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1218 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.