Post your R5 Images Here

I also shoot hunter/jumper but I am not getting that clear/tack sharp images like you. What lens are you shooting with as if I would have dropped to 1/1250th shutter speed mine would be blurry? What are ypur men settings that matter also?

Cedar waxwings are back and sooooo slick

robamy wrote in post #19237467

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2kZk​4wW Northern Cardinal by A & R Photography, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2kZu​4q8 Chillin in the yard by A & R Photography, on Flickr

That is one chilled out rabbit.

Harris's Antelope Squirrel...

umphotography wrote in post #19237193
At 6400 ISO you are not going to see a lot of difference on any on the new sensors post the 5D4/1Dx2 update.....everything is clean at 6400 ISO with very little differences to see.

Go to 12800-16000 ISO and thats where the differences will show. I personally think the R6 and the 1Dx3 are the cleanest sensors that canon has with the nod going to the R6. What you see here at 6400 ISO is probably 25000 ISO on the R6. Its a super clean sensor and the one I will get when its time to get a mirrorless

I will agree that the R6 has less read noise, but I don't think that the extent of your claim can be supported, unless you are talking about 100% pixel views of deep shadows with the R5 receiving a lot more sharpening at the pixel level, which is not a remotely level comparison, even if commonly done. The R6 is much noisier at ISO 25.6K than the R6 is at ISO 6400 with normalized image size; differences in exposure (with the same size sensor) or total light (when sensor sizes are different) are generally more significant than differences between cameras. The R5 collects 4x as much total light in your scenario; do you think the R5 gives as much noise with 4x the total light? In fact, even the 5Ds holds up well in ISO 12,800 shadows, compared with the R6 at ISO 25,600:

https://www.dpreview.c​om …4035&y=0.140993​8015560555

John Sheehy wrote in post #19237618
I will agree that the R6 has less read noise, but I don't think that the extent of your claim can be supported, unless you are talking about 100% pixel views of deep shadows with the R5 receiving a lot more sharpening at the pixel level, which is not a remotely level comparison, even if commonly done. The R6 is much noisier at ISO 25.6K than the R6 is at ISO 6400 with normalized image size; differences in exposure (with the same size sensor) or total light (when sensor sizes are different) are generally more significant than differences between cameras. The R5 collects 4x as much total light in your scenario; do you think the R5 gives as much noise with 4x the total light? In fact, even the 5Ds holds up well in ISO 12,800 shadows, compared with the R6 at ISO 25,600:

https://www.dpreview.c​om …4035&y=0.140993​8015560555

John- how do you figure the "R5 collects 4x as much total light"? What is the comparison?

Marblehead lighthouse, Ottawa County, Ohio.

Lakewood, CO

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2kZ5​B4T

Tricolored Heron.
Don

Photo from Littlefield's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1103613)

Two fine looking old cars from a car meet last night outside the city. Both shot with the 105 to get something which looks different from everyone else's car photos.

Magnus3D wrote in post #19237858
Two fine looking old cars from a car meet last night outside the city. Both shot with the 105 to get something which looks different from everyone else's car photos.
/ Magnus

And two beauties they are.
Never seen a Saab of that type.
Interesting number plate.
Not very appropriate!
Here that means died, or croaked it as used on a piece of machinery
That Alfa looks delicious
You've captured those very nicely indeed

vk2gwk wrote in post #19236639
Don't see much difference at higher ISO between the R and the R5...

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com​/photos/vk2gwk/5118397​2312/

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com​/photos/vk2gwk/5118570​9670/

ISO 6400 is not especially high for a modern FF camera when using the entire frame, and lighting is very good, as it seems to be here. If you were to go out into deeply shaded woods and shoot with ISO 6400 and crop heavily for your image, you should see more of a difference, with the cameras capturing very little red light, making any blotches or patterns in the read noise obvious in the red channel.

Blue-gray gnatcatcher

Great capture.

View_Finder wrote in post #19237904
Blue-gray gnatcatcher

Hosted photo: posted by View_Finder in
./showthread.php?p=192​37904&i=i214237293
forum: Canon Digital Cameras